Category Archives: 中國的情報戰

Chinese People’s Liberation Army : “Selected Collection of Important Documents on Military Work of the Communist Party of China”

中國人民解放軍:《中國共產黨軍事工作重要文獻選集》

現代英語:

Beijing, July 30. The “Selected Collection of Important Documents on the Military Work of the Communist Party of China” edited by the Party History and Documentation Research Institute of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the Academy of Military Sciences of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army has been published by the Central Literature Publishing House and the People’s Liberation Army Publishing House. The main chapters of the book are introduced below.

  ”On Correcting Wrong Thoughts within the Party” is the first part of the resolution written by Comrade Mao Zedong for the Ninth Congress of the Fourth Army of the Red Army of the Communist Party of China in December 1929. It was pointed out that various non-proletarian ideas existed within the Communist Party of the Fourth Red Army, which was a great hindrance to the implementation of the party’s correct line. Based on the spirit of the September letter from the Central Committee, the congress pointed out the manifestations, sources and methods of correction of various non-proletarian ideas within the Fourth Army Party, and called on comrades to rise up and eliminate them thoroughly. It was emphasized that the Red Army is by no means simply fighting wars. In addition to fighting to eliminate the enemy’s military power, it also undertakes major tasks such as propagandizing the masses, organizing the masses, arming the masses, helping the masses establish revolutionary political power and even establish communist organizations.

  ”A single spark can start a prairie fire” is a letter written by Comrade Mao Zedong on January 5, 1930. The letter criticized some comrades in the party for their pessimistic assessment of the current situation, pointing out that “there is no profound concept of establishing a red political power in the guerrilla areas” and that “nationwide, including all localities, win over the masses first and then The theory of establishing political power is not suitable for the actual situation of the Chinese revolution. “The main source of their theory is that they did not clearly understand that China is a semi-colony that many imperialist countries compete with each other. The letter provides an in-depth analysis of the balance of power between the enemy and ourselves, and profoundly reveals the inevitable development trend of the Chinese revolution from a “spark” of a small red regime to a “prairie fire” across the country.

  ”Strategic Issues in China’s Revolutionary War” was written by Comrade Mao Zedong in December 1936 and gave a lecture at the Red Army University. The article discusses the basic viewpoints and methods of studying war issues, further discusses the characteristics of China’s revolutionary war and the main conditions for victory, stipulates the guiding line for the Red Army’s war under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, and stipulates the characteristics of China’s revolutionary war. Strategy and tactics. The main ones are: it is necessary to grasp the law of long-term repetition of “encirclement and suppression” and counter-“encirclement and suppression”; it is necessary to adopt the strategic policy of active defense; it is necessary to retreat and lure the enemy deeper for the attack under certain conditions; it is necessary to implement the concentration of troops to defeat the enemy. We should adopt mobile warfare as the main form of combat of the Red Army; we should adopt strategic protracted warfare, battles and quick decisive battles in battles, and regard the war of annihilation as a fundamental guiding ideology of the Red Army’s operations.

  ”Strategic Issues in the Anti-Japanese Guerrilla War” was written by Comrade Mao Zedong in May 1938 in response to the erroneous tendency of many people inside and outside the Party at that time to underestimate the important strategic role of guerrilla war and to place their hopes only in regular warfare, especially in the operations of the Kuomintang army. A long article written. It is pointed out that the strategic problem of guerrilla war occurs under such circumstances: China is neither a small country nor, unlike the Soviet Union, a large but weak country. This big but weak country is attacked by another small but strong country, but this big but weak country is in the era of progress, and the whole problem occurs from here. Because China is large and weak, but has the Communist Party and its army and the broad masses of the people; Japan is small and strong, but has insufficient military strength, which will leave many empty places in its occupied areas. This makes the Eighth Route Army led by the Communist Party and the anti-Japanese The people’s armed forces have gained broad scope in developing guerrilla warfare behind enemy lines. The anti-Japanese guerrilla war is not just a tactical and operational issue, but has a strategic status.

  ”On Protracted War” was a speech delivered by Comrade Mao Zedong at the Yan’an Anti-Japanese War Research Society from May 26 to June 3, 1938. Based on the experience of the past year of the Anti-Japanese War, the article refuted the “theory of national subjugation” and the “theory of quick victory” and pointed out that the Sino-Japanese War was a desperate struggle between semi-colonial and semi-feudal China and imperialist Japan in the 1930s. war. In this war, China and Japan had four basic contradictory characteristics. These characteristics stipulate that the protracted war and the final victory belong to China, and China must adopt the policy of lasting victory over the enemy in the war of resistance. The article scientifically foresees the three stages that the Anti-Japanese War will pass through. The article completely puts forward the strategic and tactical guiding principles of the Anti-Japanese War, pointing out that the soldiers and the people are the foundation of victory; the deepest root of the power of war exists among the people.

  ”War and Strategic Issues” is part of the conclusion made by Comrade Mao Zedong at the enlarged Sixth Plenary Session of the Sixth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on November 6, 1938. It was pointed out that the strategic status of the anti-Japanese guerrilla war must be clarified. In the entire War of Resistance Against Japan, regular warfare is the main force and guerrilla warfare is the auxiliary force, but guerrilla warfare occupies an important strategic position. Because there is no guerrilla war with the largest and most persistent force behind enemy lines, the enemy has no worries, and the attack will be more aggressive. The continued resistance may be shaken; or the counterattack force is insufficiently prepared and there is no response during the counterattack, it is impossible to defeat Japan. China’s survival depends on the outcome of the war. Therefore, the study of military theory, strategy and tactics, and political work cannot be delayed, and the theory of war and strategy is the backbone of everything.

  ”Concentrate superior forces and annihilate enemies individually” is an instruction to the party drafted by Comrade Mao Zedong for the Central Military Commission of the Communist Party of China on September 16, 1946. The instructions concentrated on the combat methods of concentrating superior forces and annihilating the enemy one by one, and fundamentally solved the military principle problem of how to gradually defeat the Kuomintang army in the war. It was pointed out that the principle of concentrating forces to annihilate the enemy individually is to take the annihilation of the enemy’s effective forces as the main goal, and not to defend or seize the place as the main goal. The instructions also pointed out that the effects of this method of warfare are: first, total annihilation; second, quick victory. Quick decisions in tactics and operations are a necessary condition for lasting strategy.

  The “Declaration of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army” is a political declaration drafted by Comrade Mao Zedong for the headquarters of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army on October 10, 1947. It was pointed out that the purpose of our army’s operations, which has been repeatedly announced at home and abroad, is for the liberation of the Chinese people and the Chinese nation. Today, it is to realize the urgent demands of the people across the country, to overthrow Chiang Kai-shek, the culprit of the civil war, to organize a democratic coalition government to achieve the overall goal of liberating the people and the nation, and to announce eight basic policies. Emphasizing that all officers and soldiers of our army must always remember that we are the great People’s Liberation Army and a team led by the great Communist Party of China. As long as we always abide by the party’s instructions, we will surely win.

  ”The People’s Liberation Army is always a fighting team and a working team” is part of Comrade Mao Zedong’s report at the second plenary session of the Seventh Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on March 5, 1949. It was pointed out that there are only three ways to deal with the remaining Kuomintang troops in the future: Tianjin, Peiping, and Suiyuan. The People’s Liberation Army is always a fighting team and a work team. As the fighting gradually decreases, the role of the work team increases, especially when the Beiping method or the Suiyuan method is used to solve problems in various parts of the south. Within a short period of time, the entire People’s Liberation Army must be transformed into work teams. The 2.1 million field army must be regarded as a huge cadre school. In the situation of national victory, the focus of the party’s work must be moved from the countryside to the city, and great efforts must be made to learn to manage and build cities.

  ”The Victory and Significance of Resisting U.S. Aggression and Aiding Korea” was part of Comrade Mao Zedong’s speech at the 24th Session of the Central People’s Government Committee on September 12, 1953. It was pointed out that after three years of resisting U.S. aggression and aiding Korea, a great victory was achieved, and there were military, political, and economic reasons for its success. Leadership is one factor, and the masses’ thinking of solutions is the most important. Our experience is: relying on the people and a relatively correct leadership, we can use our inferior equipment to defeat the enemy with superior equipment. The victory in the War to Resist U.S. Aggression and Aid Korea was great and of great significance.

  The “General Provisions of the Political Work Regulations of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (Draft)” were promulgated by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the People’s Revolutionary Military Commission of the Central People’s Government on April 15, 1954, and ordered the entire army to implement them. There are seven general principles in total, which point out that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is the armed force of the People’s Republic of China and a people’s army led by the Communist Party of China that defends the motherland and serves the people’s revolutionary struggle and national construction. The Communist Party of China is the founder and organizer of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. The Party’s Marxist-Leninist political line and military line are the decisive factors for this army’s victory. Standing closely with the people and serving the people wholeheartedly is the sole purpose of this army. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army must resolutely fight for the party’s program and line and for socialist communism. The Communist Party of China has established party committees at all levels in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army as the core of the unified leadership of the army; it has also determined the division of labor and responsibility system of chiefs under the unified collective leadership of the party committee as the party’s leadership system for the army. The political work of the Communist Party of China in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is the lifeline of our army.

  ”The Relationship between Economic Construction and National Defense Construction” is the third part of Comrade Mao Zedong’s speech at the enlarged meeting of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee on April 25, 1956. The speech explained the dialectical relationship between economic construction and national defense construction, pointing out that national defense is indispensable. Now, we have a certain defense capability. Our defense industry is building. Only if economic construction develops faster can national defense construction make greater progress. We must strengthen national defense, so we must first strengthen economic construction. This is a question of strategic policy.

  ”The Task of Military Reorganization” was Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s speech at the enlarged meeting of the Central Military Commission of the Communist Party of China on July 14, 1975. He pointed out that the army is now a bit bloated, scattered, arrogant, extravagant and lazy. To reorganize the army is to reorganize the five words mentioned above. During the reorganization of the army, it is necessary to strengthen cadre learning, strengthen party spirit, opposition spirit, strengthen discipline, and carry forward the traditional style of hard work. The Military Commission must focus on establishment, equipment, and strategy. The issues to be studied in strategy are not only combat issues, but also training. Our tradition has always been that political organs manage cadres, and leaders always have to go through political organs to assess and review cadres. This is in line with organizational principles. We must inherit this good tradition. Nowadays, when selecting cadres, especially senior cadres, we must choose those who work hard or work relatively hard. The responsibility for running the military well lies with the main members above the military level. As long as everyone takes the lead and works hard to achieve the eight words Comrade Mao Zedong said: unity, intensity, seriousness, and liveliness, the problems of the army will not be difficult to solve, and the party’s line, principles, and policies can be implemented well. In short, the people’s army must carry forward the revolutionary tradition and strive for greater glory.

  ”The military must raise education and training to a strategic position” was part of Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s speech at a symposium of the Central Military Commission of the Communist Party of China on August 23, 1977. It was pointed out that under the conditions of no war, the education and training of the military should be raised to a strategic position. It should be done from two aspects. On the one hand, the army itself should promote hard study and training; on the other hand, it should solve the cadre problem by running schools. There are three requirements for running a school. First, train cadres, select cadres, and recommend cadres. Second, earnestly study the knowledge of modern warfare and learn the joint operations of all services and arms. Third, restore the traditional style of our military. The purpose of running a school is to improve the level of the cadres, strengthen their capabilities, and make them younger, especially the cadres of the combat troops, so that our cadres can master some knowledge of modern warfare and have a good style of work.

  ”Our strategic policy is active defense” was part of Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s speech at the plenary session of the Defense Operations Research Class held by the General Staff Headquarters of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army on October 15, 1980. Point out, what policy will we adopt in our future anti-aggression war? I agree with the four words “active defense”. Active defense itself is not just a defense, there is offense within defense. Another thing to emphasize is to focus on training. You can’t relax on this matter. In training, we must pay attention to synthetic training and focus on synthetic army combat training. Not only schools pay attention to training, but the troops also pay attention to actual combat training.

  ”Building a powerful modernized and regularized revolutionary army” was a speech delivered by Comrade Deng Xiaoping when he reviewed the military exercise troops somewhere in North China on September 19, 1981. It was pointed out that our army is a strong pillar of the people’s democratic dictatorship and shoulders the glorious mission of defending the socialist motherland and safeguarding the construction of the four modernizations. Our army must be built into a powerful, modern and regularized revolutionary army.

  ”The military must obey the overall situation of national construction” was part of Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s speech at the Central Military Commission symposium on November 1, 1984. He pointed out that what is needed now is for the party, government, military and civilians across the country to wholeheartedly obey the overall situation of national construction and take care of this overall situation. Our military has its own responsibilities and must not hinder this overall situation. It must closely cooperate with this overall situation and act within this overall situation. Everyone must proceed from the overall situation, take care of the overall situation, and do everything possible to develop our country’s economy.

  ”Speech at the Enlarged Meeting of the Central Military Commission” was Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s speech on June 4, 1985. It was pointed out that reducing the number of personnel in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army by one million is a sign of the strength and confidence of the Chinese Communist Party, the Chinese government and the Chinese people. It was pointed out that after smashing the “Gang of Four”, especially after the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, our judgment on the international situation has changed, and our foreign policy has also changed. These are two important changes. The first change is the understanding of war and peace issues. It is possible that a large-scale world war will not occur for a relatively long period of time, and there is hope for maintaining world peace. Based on these analyzes of the general trend of the world and the analysis of our surrounding environment, we have changed our original view that the danger of war is imminent. The second change is our foreign policy. For some time in the past, we implemented a “one-line” strategy. Now we have changed that strategy, which is a major shift. We pursue an independent and correct diplomatic line and foreign policy, hold high the banner of opposing hegemonism and safeguarding world peace, and stand firmly on the side of the forces of peace.

  The “Notice of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China approving the Central Military Commission’s Decision on Military Political Work in the New Era” was issued on February 15, 1987. It was pointed out that this decision is guided by Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought, inherits the fine traditions of the political work of the party and the army, and combines the tasks and situations faced by the army in the new historical period, and sets out the guiding ideology, main tasks, principles and policies of the political work of the army. and basic methods, and has made correct explanations and regulations, which has an important long-term guiding role in ensuring the revolutionary, modernization, and regularization of the army and ensuring that the army completes the glorious mission of defending the motherland and building the motherland. The “Decision” discusses how to implement strategic changes in adapting to the guiding ideology of national defense construction and army building and do a good job in the political work of the army in the new era. It is divided into seven issues. It was pointed out that the People’s Liberation Army shoulders major historical responsibilities in realizing the country’s three major tasks and must strengthen the political work of our army under new historical conditions.

  ”Speech when meeting all comrades attending the enlarged meeting of the Central Military Commission” was a speech delivered by Comrade Deng Xiaoping on November 12, 1989. pointed out that I am convinced that our military can always adhere to its own nature. This nature is the army of the party, the army of the people, and the army of the socialist country. This is different from militaries around the world. It is also different from the armies of other socialist countries because their armies have different experiences from our armies. Our military must always be loyal to the party, the people, the country, and socialism.

  ”The troops must be politically qualified, militarily strong, have a good work style, have strict discipline, and have strong support” was part of Comrade Jiang Zemin’s speech at the military work conference of the entire army on December 1, 1990. It was pointed out that the most fundamental thing to do in building the army is to do a good job in ideological and political work. It is necessary to strengthen organizational discipline and ensure the concentration and unity of the troops. Military training is an important means for the troops to cultivate their style, improve their military quality, and enhance their combat effectiveness in peacetime. Military training must be placed in a strategic position. Whether it is military training or the entire military work, we should do it in a practical way. Only by doing it in a practical way can we achieve results.

  ”The International Situation and Military Strategic Principles” was the main part of Comrade Jiang Zemin’s speech at the enlarged meeting of the Central Military Commission on January 13, 1993. It is pointed out that the basic content of the military strategic policy of active defense is to take Mao Zedong’s military thought and Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s thoughts on military construction in the new era as the fundamental guidance, obey and serve the national development strategy, and be based on winning a possible modern technological special situation. It is a local war under high-tech conditions. Accelerate the quality construction of our army, strive to improve our army’s emergency combat capabilities, use strengths and avoid weaknesses, be flexible, contain wars, win wars, defend the country’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests, maintain the unity of the motherland and social stability, and provide Reform, opening up and modernization provide a strong security guarantee.

  The “Notice of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Forwarding the Decision on Several Issues Concerning the Ideological and Political Construction of the Army under the Conditions of Reform, Opening Up and the Development of a Socialist Market Economy” was issued on August 24, 1999. It was pointed out that winning future high-tech wars and maintaining the nature, true character and style of the people’s army are the party’s highest political requirements for the people’s army in the new era. The “Decision” pointed out that we must unswervingly hold high the great banner of Deng Xiaoping Theory, ensure the Party’s absolute leadership over the military, must always put ideological and political construction at the top of all military constructions, and must closely focus on the centralization of military modernization. We must adhere to the unity of inheriting fine traditions and reform and innovation. The mission of our military’s ideological and political construction under the new historical conditions is to provide strong spiritual motivation for winning future high-tech wars and to provide reliable political guarantee for maintaining the nature, true character and style of the people’s army.

  ”Mechanization and informatization are the dual historical tasks of our military construction” was part of Comrade Jiang Zemin’s speech at the enlarged meeting of the Central Military Commission on December 11, 2000. He pointed out that by stepping up preparations for military struggle, we have grasped the main contradiction in the current military construction. We must strive to complete the dual historical tasks of mechanization and informatization of our army, focus on building a modern combat system that adapts to the requirements of high-tech warfare, persist in using the spirit of reform and innovation to carry out the comprehensive construction of our army centered on modernization, and further improve the mechanism of scientific decision-making and means.

  ”On Military Transformation with Chinese Characteristics” was Comrade Jiang Zemin’s speech at the enlarged meeting of the Central Military Commission on December 27, 2002. It is pointed out that the new military revolution is entering a new stage of qualitative change and is likely to develop into a profound military revolution that affects the world and involves all military fields. It will inevitably lead to revolutionary changes in a series of aspects such as military construction and combat methods. It is possible that It further widens the gap in military strength between China and major countries in the world and increases the potential threat to China’s military security. With a sense of urgency that time cannot wait, we must actively promote military reform with Chinese characteristics, accelerate the transformation of our military from mechanization and semi-mechanization to informationization, and comprehensively improve our military’s deterrence and actual combat capabilities.

  ”The Historical Mission of Our Army in the New Century and New Stage” was part of Comrade Hu Jintao’s speech at the enlarged meeting of the Central Military Commission on December 24, 2004. It was pointed out that after a comprehensive analysis of the development requirements of the times and changes in China’s security situation, the historical mission of our army in the new century and new stage must be accurately grasped from the following aspects: providing an important force guarantee for the party to consolidate its ruling position, and safeguarding the development of the country. It provides a strong security guarantee during a period of important strategic opportunities, provides strong strategic support for safeguarding national interests, and plays an important role in safeguarding world peace and promoting common development.

  ”Transformation to Military Training under Informatization Conditions” was part of Comrade Hu Jintao’s speech at the military training conference on June 27, 2006. It was pointed out that entering the new stage of the new century, our army has adapted to the development trend of war forms and combat methods, established the strategic goal of building an information-based army and winning information-based wars, and strives to promote the compound development of mechanization and informationization. Military training is undergoing a revolution. Profound change. Based on the actual progress and development level of mechanization and informatization construction, we must proceed from reality, provide classified guidance, creatively carry out military training, strive to improve the quality and effect of training, and solidly promote the transformation of military training under mechanized conditions to military training under informationized conditions. Accelerate the improvement of our military’s deterrence and actual combat capabilities under informationization conditions.

  ”Building a consolidated national defense and a strong military compatible with national security and development interests” was part of Comrade Hu Jintao’s speech at the enlarged meeting of the Central Military Commission on December 28, 2007. It was pointed out that continuing to develop socialism with Chinese characteristics at a new historical starting point has put forward new requirements for strengthening national defense and army building. We must strive to build a solid national defense and a strong military that is commensurate with the country’s international status and consistent with national security and development interests. Enriching the country and strengthening the army are the two cornerstones for developing socialism with Chinese characteristics and realizing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. It is necessary to coordinate economic construction and national defense construction, and achieve the unity of enriching the country and strengthening the military in the process of building a moderately prosperous society in an all-round way.

  ”Cultivating the Core Values ​​of Contemporary Revolutionary Soldiers” was part of Comrade Hu Jintao’s speech at the enlarged meeting of the Central Military Commission on December 24, 2008. It was pointed out that the core values ​​of contemporary revolutionary soldiers are embodied in “loyalty to the party, love for the people, serving the country, dedication to the mission, and advocating honor.” We must persist in using the core values ​​of contemporary revolutionary soldiers to guide the thoughts and behaviors of officers and soldiers, guide officers and soldiers to always maintain political firmness and ideological and moral purity, and truly win the battle without deterioration. It is necessary to integrate the core values ​​​​of contemporary revolutionary soldiers into all aspects of military building, and do a good job in ideological education, public opinion guidance, cultural edification, model demonstration, practical cultivation, and institutional guarantees, so that the core values ​​​​of contemporary revolutionary soldiers can be universally understood and recognized by officers and soldiers, and they can consciously cultivate and practice them. .

  The “Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, the State Council, and the Central Military Commission on Strengthening National Defense Education under the New Situation” was issued on April 19, 2011. It was pointed out that national defense education is the foundation for building and consolidating national defense and an important way to enhance national cohesion and improve the quality of the entire people. We must fully understand the importance of strengthening national defense education under the new situation. It is necessary to firmly establish a concept of national defense that is consistent with the requirements of the Scientific Outlook on Development, focus on national defense education for leading cadres at all levels, vigorously promote the popularization of national defense education in all sectors of society, actively improve and innovate methods and means of national defense education, and strive to provide policies for popularizing national defense education Support and related guarantees, and effectively strengthen the organizational leadership of national defense education.

  ”Firmly grasp the goal of strengthening the military and build a strong people’s army” was part of Comrade Xi Jinping’s speech at the plenary session of the People’s Liberation Army delegation at the first session of the 12th National People’s Congress on March 11, 2013. It was pointed out that the party’s goal of strengthening the army under the new situation is to build a people’s army that obeys the party’s command, can win wars, and has a good work style. Listening to the party’s command is the soul and determines the political direction of military construction; being able to win battles is the core, reflecting the fundamental functions of the military and the fundamental direction of military construction; excellent work style is the guarantee, and is related to the nature, purpose and true quality of the military. This goal clarifies the focus and focus of strengthening military construction, which the entire military must accurately grasp to guide military construction, reform and military struggle preparations, and strive to raise national defense and military construction to a new level.

  ”Deepening National Defense and Military Reform” is the fifteenth part of the “Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Several Major Issues Concerning Comprehensively Deepening Reform” adopted at the third plenary session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on November 12, 2013. It is pointed out that we must closely focus on the party’s goal of strengthening the military under the new situation, strive to solve outstanding contradictions and problems that restrict the development of national defense and military construction, innovate and develop military theory, strengthen military strategic guidance, improve military strategic guidelines for the new era, and build a modern modern society with Chinese characteristics. military power system.

  ”Effectively strengthening and improving the political work of our military under the new situation” was part of Comrade Xi Jinping’s speech at the military political work conference on October 31, 2014. It was pointed out that we must closely focus on the theme of the times for our military’s political work, strengthen and improve our military’s political work under the new situation, and give full play to the lifeline role of political work in strengthening and rejuvenating the army. The most important thing is to firmly establish four fundamental things in the entire army: ideals and beliefs, party spirit principles, combat effectiveness standards, and political work authority. He emphasized that adhering to the Party’s absolute leadership over the military is the soul of a strong military, and forging a solid military soul is the core task of our military’s political work. It is necessary to grasp the characteristics and laws of soul-casting and educating people under the new situation, and strive to cultivate a new generation of revolutionary soldiers with soul, ability, blood and moral character.

  ”Comprehensively implement the strategy of reforming and strengthening the military, and unswervingly follow the path of strengthening the military with Chinese characteristics” was part of Comrade Xi Jinping’s speech at the Central Military Commission Reform Work Conference on November 24, 2015. It is pointed out that deepening the reform of national defense and the army is the requirement of the times to realize the Chinese Dream and the dream of building a strong military. It is the only way to strengthen and rejuvenate the army, and it is also a key move to determine the future of the army. In accordance with the requirements of the “Four Comprehensives” strategic layout, guided by the Party’s goal of strengthening the military under the new situation, we must implement the military strategic guidelines under the new situation, comprehensively implement the strategy of reform and strengthening the military, and strive to solve the institutional obstacles that restrict national defense and military construction. , structural contradictions and policy issues, promote the modernization of the military’s organizational form, further liberate and develop combat effectiveness, further liberate and enhance the vitality of the military, and build a consolidated national defense and a strong military commensurate with our country’s international status and compatible with national security and development interests, Provide a strong guarantee of strength to achieve the “Two Centenary Goals” and realize the Chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. It was emphasized that the General Principle of the leadership and command system reform is that the Military Commission takes charge of the overall affairs, the theaters are responsible for the battle, and the military services are responsible for the construction.

  ”Comprehensively implement the innovation-driven development strategy and promote national defense and military construction to achieve new leaps” was part of Comrade Xi Jinping’s speech at the plenary session of the People’s Liberation Army Delegation at the Fourth Session of the 12th National People’s Congress on March 13, 2016. It is pointed out that innovation capability is the core competitiveness of an army and an accelerator for generating and improving combat effectiveness. Promoting new leaps and bounds in national defense and military construction through reform and innovation is a key to determining the future and destiny of our military. We must make great efforts to focus on theoretical innovation, scientific and technological innovation, scientific management, talent gathering, and practical innovation, drive and promote comprehensive innovation with key breakthroughs, and continuously create new situations for strengthening the military.

  ”On the Central Military Commission’s Adherence to the Chairman’s Responsibility System” was part of Comrade Xi Jinping’s speech at the Central Military Commission’s Democratic Life Conference on February 4, 2017. He pointed out that our party’s system is for the party leader to serve as chairman of the Central Military Commission, which is to ensure the party’s absolute leadership over the military. We must understand the extreme importance of this system from the perspective of prosperity and long-term stability of the party, country and army. The chairman’s responsibility system solves the issue of the highest leadership and command power of our military. It is the chairman of the Central Military Commission who has the final say and final say on major issues of our military. To implement the chairman’s responsibility system, the entire military must be particularly clear-headed and conscious in its actions, and report major issues to the request for instructions.

  ”Speech at the Conference to Celebrate the 90th Anniversary of the Founding of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army” was Comrade Xi Jinping’s speech on August 1, 2017. It was pointed out that standing at a new historical starting point, we must speed up the construction of the people’s army into a world-class army. To advance the cause of building a strong military, we must unswervingly uphold the Party’s absolute leadership over the military and ensure that the People’s Army always follows the Party; we must uphold and develop the Party’s military guiding theory, and constantly open up new realms of development of Marxist military theory and contemporary China’s military practice; We must always focus on preparing for war, and forging elite troops who are ready to fight when called upon, and who are sure to win in battle; we must persist in building the army politically, strengthening the army through reform, developing the army through science and technology, and running the army in accordance with the law, so as to comprehensively improve the modernization level of national defense and the army. ; We must further promote the development of military-civilian integration and build a national strategic system and capability for military-civilian integration; we must adhere to the fundamental purpose of serving the people wholeheartedly and always be a soldier trusted by the people, supported by the people, and loved by the people.

  ”Adhere to the path of strengthening the military with Chinese characteristics and comprehensively promote the modernization of national defense and the military” was part of Comrade Xi Jinping’s report at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China on October 18, 2017. It was pointed out that in the face of profound changes in the national security environment and the requirements of the times for a strong country and strong military, we must fully implement the Party’s thought on strengthening the military in the new era, implement the military strategic guidelines under the new situation, and build a powerful modern army, navy, air force, rocket Army and strategic support forces, build a strong and efficient theater joint operations command structure, build a modern combat system with Chinese characteristics, and shoulder the missions of the new era entrusted by the party and the people.

  ”Continuously creating a new realm for the development of contemporary China’s Marxist military theory and military practice” was part of Comrade Xi Jinping’s speech at the enlarged meeting of the Central Military Commission on December 22, 2017. It was pointed out that in the magnificent practice of strengthening the army, we focus on realizing the Chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, focus on what kind of strong people’s army to build in the new era and how to build a strong people’s army, and conduct in-depth theoretical exploration and practical creation to form The Party’s thought on strengthening the army in the new era. It is clear that a strong country must have a strong army. Consolidating national defense and a strong people’s army are strategic supports for upholding and developing socialism with Chinese characteristics and realizing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation in the new era. It is clear that the party’s goal of strengthening the army in the new era is to build a force that can obey the party’s command and be capable. The people’s army that wins battles and has an excellent work style must be consistent with the national modernization process and strive to basically realize the modernization of national defense and the army by 2035, and fully build the people’s army into a world-class army by the middle of this century; it is clear that the party’s absolute leadership over the army is the people The foundation of building an army and the soul of a strong army must fully implement a series of fundamental principles and systems for the Party’s leadership of the army to ensure that the army is absolutely loyal, absolutely pure, and absolutely reliable; it is clear that the army must be prepared to fight, and must focus on being able to fight and fight. To win the war, innovatively develop military strategic guidance, build a modern combat system with Chinese characteristics, comprehensively improve the ability to prepare for war in the new era, effectively shape the situation, manage crises, contain wars, and win wars; it is clear that excellent work style is the distinctive feature and political advantage of our military, and must Strengthen the construction of work style and discipline, unswervingly improve the work style and discipline, fight corruption and punish evil, vigorously carry forward the glorious traditions and fine styles of our party and our army, and always maintain the nature, purpose and true quality of the people’s army; it is clear that to advance the cause of strengthening the army, we must adhere to political construction The army, reform and strengthen the army, develop the army through science and technology, and run the army in accordance with the law, pay more attention to focusing on actual combat, pay more attention to innovation-driven, pay more attention to system construction, pay more attention to intensive and efficient, pay more attention to military-civilian integration, comprehensively improve the level of revolution, modernization and regularization; clarify the reform It is the only way to strengthen the army. We must promote the modernization of the military’s organizational form, build a modern military force system with Chinese characteristics, and improve the socialist military system with Chinese characteristics. It is clear that innovation is the first driving force for development, and we must insist on seeking combat effectiveness from scientific and technological innovation, and coordinate the advancement of the military Innovate in theory, technology, organization, management, culture and other aspects to build an innovative people’s army; clarify that a modern military must build a military legal system with Chinese characteristics, promote fundamental changes in the way of running the military, and improve the level of legalization of national defense and military construction; clarify that the military and civilians must Integrated development is a strategy to rejuvenate the country and strengthen the military. We must adhere to the principle of balancing development and security, enriching the country and strengthening the military, forming an all-factor, multi-domain, and highly effective military-civilian integration in-depth development pattern, and building an integrated national strategic system and capabilities. We must comprehensively and accurately study and understand the Party’s thought on strengthening the military in the new era and implement it unswervingly.

  ”Unswervingly Uphold the Party’s Absolute Leadership over the Military” was part of Comrade Xi Jinping’s speech at the Party Building Conference of the Central Military Commission on August 17, 2018. It was pointed out that to uphold the Party’s absolute leadership over the military, first of all, the entire military must be absolutely loyal to the Party. To be absolutely loyal to the Party, we must build a solid ideological foundation of listening to the Party and following the Party. It is necessary to strengthen loyalty identification and political inspection to ensure that the barrel of the gun is firmly in the hands of those who are absolutely loyal to the party.

  ”Uphold and improve the Party’s absolute leadership system over the People’s Army and ensure that the People’s Army faithfully performs its missions and tasks in the new era” is the “Central Committee of the Communist Party of China’s Resolution on Upholding the Mission and Tasks of the New Era” adopted at the Fourth Plenary Session of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on October 31, 2019. and the Decision on Several Major Issues in Improving the Socialist System with Chinese Characteristics and Advancing the Modernization of the National Governance System and Governance Capacity.” It was pointed out that the party’s absolute leadership over the people’s army is the foundation of the people’s army and the soul of a strong army. The Central Military Commission’s implementation of the chairman’s responsibility system is the fundamental implementation form of upholding the party’s absolute leadership over the people’s military. We must firmly establish the guiding position of Xi Jinping’s Thought on Strengthening the Military in national defense and military construction, insist that the highest leadership and command power of the People’s Army belong to the Party Central Committee, improve the Party building system of the People’s Army, and implement the Party’s absolute leadership over the People’s Army into the military The entire process of construction in various fields.

  ”Comprehensively strengthening practical military training and comprehensively improving training levels and winning capabilities” are the key points of Comrade Xi Jinping’s speech at the Central Military Commission’s military training conference on November 25, 2020. It is pointed out that military training is the regular and central work of the army, the basic way to generate and improve combat effectiveness, and the most direct preparation for military struggle. We must continue to focus on preparing for war, adhere to actual combat training, joint combat training, science and technology-based training, and law-based training, carry forward fine traditions, strengthen reform and innovation, accelerate the construction of a new military training system, and comprehensively improve training levels and winning capabilities, in order to achieve The Party’s goal of strengthening the military in the new era is to provide strong support for building our military into a world-class military.

  ”Promoting historic achievements and historic changes in national defense and military construction in the new era” is derived from the “Major Issues of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on the Party’s Centenary Struggle” adopted at the Sixth Plenary Session of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on November 11, 2021. The fourth part of the resolution “Creating a New Era of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics”. It was pointed out that since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the party has proposed the goal of strengthening the military in the new era, established military strategic guidelines for the new era, and formulated the goal of achieving the centenary goal of the founding of the army by 2027, basically realizing the modernization of national defense and the army by 2035, and The new “three-step” strategy for national defense and military modernization to build a world-class military in an all-round way by the middle of the century, promote political military building, strengthen the military through reform, strengthen the military through science and technology, strengthen the military through talent, and run the military in accordance with the law, and accelerate the modernization of military theory and the modernization of military organizational forms. , modernize military personnel, modernize weapons and equipment, accelerate the integrated development of mechanization, informatization and intelligence, comprehensively strengthen military training and preparations, and adhere to the path of building a strong military with Chinese characteristics. Under the strong leadership of the Party, the People’s Army has achieved overall revolutionary reshaping, reorganized and started again, simultaneously improved its national defense strength and economic strength, accelerated the construction of an integrated national strategic system and capabilities, established and improved the management and support system for veterans, and established a national defense system. Mobilization is more efficient, and unity between the military and the government and the people is more consolidated. The People’s Army has resolutely fulfilled its missions and tasks in the new era, and defended national sovereignty, security, and development interests with its tenacious fighting spirit and practical actions.

  ”In-depth implementation of the strategy of strengthening the military through talents in the new era” is the key point of Comrade Xi Jinping’s speech at the Central Military Commission Talent Work Conference on November 26, 2021. It is pointed out that talents are the key factor to promote the high-quality development of our military, win military competition and take the initiative in future wars. To implement the strategy of strengthening the military with talents in the new era, we must implement the Party’s absolute leadership over the military in all aspects and the entire process of talent work. We must regard the ability to fight and win wars as the starting point and foothold of talent work. We must face the world’s military frontier and face major national security issues. To meet the needs of national defense and military modernization, we must cultivate and make good use of talents in an all-round way, deepen the reform of military human resources policies and systems, and implement the strategy of strengthening the country through talents.

  ”Implementing the strategy of running the military according to law and improving the level of legalization of national defense and military construction” were the key points of Comrade Xi Jinping’s speech when attending the plenary meeting of the People’s Liberation Army and Armed Police Force delegation at the fifth session of the 13th National People’s Congress on March 7, 2022. It was pointed out that running the army in accordance with the law is the basic way for our party to build and run the army, and is an inevitable requirement to achieve the party’s goal of strengthening the army in the new era. It is necessary to uphold the party’s absolute leadership over the military, adhere to combat effectiveness standards, insist on building a military legal system with Chinese characteristics, insist on transforming the way of running the military in accordance with the requirements of the rule of law, insist on strict discipline in the military, insist on seizing the “critical minority” of leading cadres, and insist on the dominant position of officers and soldiers. , insisting on implementing the requirements of comprehensively governing the country according to law.

  ”Achieve the Centenary Goal of the Founding of the Army and Create a New Situation in the Modernization of National Defense and the Army” is part of Comrade Xi Jinping’s report at the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China on October 16, 2022. It was pointed out that achieving the centenary goal of the founding of the army as scheduled and accelerating the building of the people’s army into a world-class army are strategic requirements for comprehensively building a modern socialist country. We must implement the Party’s thought on strengthening the army in the new era, implement the military strategic principles of the new era, adhere to the Party’s absolute leadership over the people’s army, adhere to political army building, reform to strengthen the army, science and technology to strengthen the army, talents to strengthen the army, and rule of law, and adhere to border struggles. , prepare for war while building, adhere to the integrated development of mechanization, informatization and intelligence, accelerate the modernization of military theory, military organizational form, military personnel, and weapons and equipment, improve the strategic ability to defend national sovereignty, security, and development interests, and effectively fulfill the new era People’s Army missions.

現代漢語普通話:

新華社北京7月30日電 由中共中央黨史與文獻研究院、中國人民解放軍軍事科學院編輯的《中國共產黨軍事工作重要文獻選編》,已由中央文獻出版社、解放軍出版社出版。現將該書主要篇目介紹如下。

《關於糾正黨內的錯誤思想》是毛澤東同志1929年12月為中國共產黨紅軍第四軍第九次代表大會寫的決議的第一部分。指出,紅軍第四軍的共產黨內存在著各種非無產階級的思想,這對於執行黨的正確路線,妨礙極大。大會根據中央九月來信的精神,指出四軍黨內各種非無產階級思想的表現、來源及其糾正的方法,號召同志們起來徹底地加以肅清。強調,紅軍決不是單純地打仗的,它除了打仗消滅敵人軍事力量之外,還要負擔宣傳群眾、組織群眾、武裝群眾、幫助群眾建立革命政權以至於建立共產黨的組織等項重大的任務。

《星星之火,可以燎原》是毛澤東同志1930年1月5日的一封信。信中批評黨內一些同志對時局估量的一種悲觀思想,指出那種“沒有在遊擊區域建立紅色政權的深刻的觀念”,那種“全國範圍的、包括一切地方的、先爭取群眾後建立政權的理論,是於中國革命的實情不適合的。信中深入分析了敵我力量對比情況,深刻地揭示了中國革命由小塊紅色政權的「星星之火」到全國「燎原」的必然發展趨勢。

《中國革命戰爭的戰略問題》是毛澤東同志1936年12月寫的,曾在紅軍大學作過講演。文章論述了研究戰爭問題的基本觀點和方法,進一步論述了中國革命戰爭的特點和取得勝利的主要條件,規定了在中國共產黨領導之下的紅軍戰爭的指導路線,規定了適合中國革命戰爭特點的戰略戰術。主要是:要掌握「圍剿」和反「圍剿」長期反復的規律﹔要採取積極防禦的戰略方針﹔要在一定條件下為著進攻所必須採取的退卻和誘敵深入﹔要實行集中兵力這個克敵制勝的作戰方法,把運動戰作為紅軍的主要作戰形式﹔要採取戰略的持久戰、戰役和戰鬥的速決戰,把殲滅戰作為紅軍作戰的一個根本指導思想。

《抗日遊擊戰爭的戰略問題》是毛澤東同志1938年5月針對當時黨內外許多人輕視遊擊戰爭的重大戰略作用,而隻把自己的希望寄託於正規戰爭,特別是國民黨軍隊的作戰的錯誤傾向所寫的一篇長文。指出,遊擊戰爭的戰略問題是在這樣的情況之下發生的:中國既不是小國,又不像蘇聯,是一個大而弱的國家。這一個大而弱的國家被另一個小而強的國家所攻擊,但是這個大而弱的國家卻處於進步的時代,全部問題就從這裡發生了。由於中國大而弱,但有共產黨及其領導的軍隊和廣大人民群眾﹔日本小而強,但兵力不足,必將在其佔領區留下許多空虛的地方,這就使共產黨領導的八路軍和抗日人民武裝發展敵後遊擊戰爭獲得廣闊的天地。抗日遊擊戰爭就不僅僅是戰術和戰役上的問題,而是具有戰略地位。

《論持久戰》是毛澤東同志1938年5月26日至6月3日在延安抗日戰爭研究會的講演。文章根據抗日戰爭一年來的經驗,批駁了“亡國論”和“速勝論”,指出,中日戰爭是半殖民地半封建的中國和帝國主義的日本之間在20世紀30年代進行的一個決死的戰爭。在這場戰爭中,中日雙方存在著互相矛盾的四個基本特點。這些特點規定了戰爭的持久性和最後勝利屬於中國,中國必須採取持久勝敵的抗戰方針。文章科學地預見了抗日戰爭必將經過的三個階段。文章完整地提出了抗日戰爭的戰略戰術指導原則,指出,兵民是勝利之本﹔戰爭的偉力之最深厚的根源,存在於民眾之中。

《戰爭與戰略問題》是毛澤東同志1938年11月6日在中國共產黨第六屆中央委員會擴大的第六次全體會議上所作結論的一部分。指出,必須明確抗日遊擊戰爭的戰略地位。在抗日戰爭的全體上,正規戰爭是主要的,遊擊戰爭是輔助的,但遊擊戰爭佔有重要的戰略地位。因為沒有敵後最廣大的最堅持的遊擊戰爭,敵無後顧之憂,進攻必更猖獗,繼續抗戰可能動搖﹔或反攻力量準備不足,反攻時沒有呼應,要戰勝日本也是不可能的。中國的存亡係於戰爭的勝負,因此,研究軍事理論,研究戰略和戰術,研究政治工作,不可或緩,而戰爭和戰略的理論則是一切的骨幹。

《集中優勢兵力,各殲滅敵人》是毛澤東同志1946年9月16日為中共中央軍委起草的對黨內的指示。指示集中闡述了集中優勢兵力、各個殲滅敵人的作戰方法,從根本上解決瞭如何在戰爭中逐步擊敗國民黨軍的軍事原則問題。指出,集中兵力各殲敵的原則,以殲滅敵軍有生力量為主要目標,不以保守或奪取地方為主要目標。指示也指出,這種戰法的效果是:一能全殲﹔二能速決。在戰術和戰役上的速決,是戰略上持久的必要條件。

《中國人民解放軍宣言》是毛澤東同志1947年10月10日為中國人民解放軍總部起草的政治宣言。指出,本軍作戰目的,迭經宣告中外,是為了中國人民和中華民族的解放。而在今天,則是實現全國人民的迫切要求,打倒內戰禍首蔣介石,組織民主聯合政府,藉以達到解放人民和民族的總目標,並宣布了八項基本政策。強調,我全軍將士必須時時牢記,我們是偉大的人民解放軍,是偉大的中國共產黨領導的隊伍。只要我們時時刻刻遵守黨的指示,我們就一定勝利。

《人民解放軍永遠是一個戰鬥隊又是一個工作隊》是毛澤東同志1949年3月5日在中國共產黨第七屆中央委員會第二次全體會議上報告的一部分。指出,今後解決殘餘國民黨軍隊的方式,不外天津、北平、綏遠三種。解放軍永遠是一個戰鬥隊又是一個工作隊,隨著戰鬥的逐步地減少,工作隊的作用就增加了,特別是在南方各地用北平方式或者綏遠方式解決問題的時候是這樣。在不要很久的時間之內,要使解放軍全部轉化為工作隊。必須把二百一十萬野戰軍看成一個巨大的幹部學校。在全國勝利的局面下,黨的工作重心必須由鄉村移到城市,必須用極大的努力去學會管理城市和建設城市。

《抗美援朝的勝利和意義》是毛澤東同志1953年9月12日在中央人民政府委員會第二十四次會議上講話的一部分。指出,抗美援朝,經過三年,取得了偉大勝利,能夠和下來有軍事方面、政治方面、經濟方面的原因。領導是一個因素,群眾想辦法是最主要的。我們的經驗是:依靠人民,再加上一個比較正確的領導,就可以用我們劣勢裝備戰勝優勢裝備的敵人。抗美援朝戰爭的勝利是偉大的,而且是有很重要意義的。

《中國人民解放軍政治工作條例總則(草案)》於1954年4月15日由中國共產黨中央委員會、中央人民政府人民革命軍事委員會頒布,命令全軍執行。總則共七條,指出,中國人民解放軍是中華人民共和國的武裝力量,是中國共產黨領導的、保衛祖國、服務於人民革命鬥爭和國家建設的人民軍隊。中國共產黨是中國人民解放軍的締造者和組織者。黨的馬克思列寧主義的政治路線和軍事路線是這個軍隊取得勝利的決定因素。緊緊地和人民站在一起,全心全意地為人民服務,就是這個軍隊的唯一的宗旨。中國人民解放軍必須堅決為黨的綱領、路線,為社會主義共產主義而奮鬥。中國共產黨在中國人民解放軍中設立黨的各級委員會,作為部隊統一領導的核心﹔並確定黨委統一的集體的領導下的首長分工負責制,為黨對軍隊的領導制度。中國共產黨在中國人民解放軍中的政治工作是我軍的生命線。

《經濟建設與國防建設的關系》是毛澤東同志1956年4月25日在中共中央政治局擴大會議上講話的第三部分。講話闡釋了經濟建設和國防建設的辯証關系,指出,國防不可不有。現在,我們有了一定的國防力量。我們的國防工業正在建立。有經濟建設發展得更快了,國防建設才能夠有更大的進步。我們一定要加強國防,因此,一定要先加強經濟建設。這是戰略方針的問題。

《軍隊整頓的任務》是鄧小平同志1975年7月14日在中共中央軍委擴大會議上的講話。指出,軍隊現在有點腫、散、驕、奢、惰。軍隊整頓就是整上面講的那五個字。軍隊整頓當中,要加強幹部學習,增強黨性,反對派性,加強紀律性,發揚艱苦奮鬥的傳統作風。軍委要抓編制,抓裝備,還要抓戰略。戰略要研究的問題,不只是作戰問題,還包括訓練。我們的傳統歷來是政治機關管幹部,首長總要經過政治機關去評鑑、審查幹部,這才符合組織原則。要把這個好的傳統繼承起來。現在選幹部,特別是選高級幹部,要選艱苦奮鬥或比較艱苦奮鬥的。搞好軍隊的責任在軍隊以上的主要成員。若要大家帶頭努力,做到毛澤東同志說的八個字,團結、緊張、嚴肅、活潑,軍隊的問題是不難解決的,黨的路線、方針、政策是可以貫徹好的。總之,人民軍隊要發揚革命傳統,爭取更大榮耀。

《軍隊要把教育訓練提升到戰略地位》是鄧小平同志1977年8月23日在中共中央軍委座談會上講話的一部分。指出,在沒有戰爭的條件下,要把軍隊的教育訓練提升到戰略地位。要從兩個方面去做。一個方面是部隊本身要提倡苦學苦練,另一方面是透過辦學校來解決幹部問題。辦學校有三個要求。第一,訓練幹部,選拔幹部,推薦幹部。第二,認真學習現代化戰爭知識,學習諸軍兵種聯合作戰。第三,恢復我們軍隊的傳統作風。辦學校要達到一個目的:使幹部隊伍水準提高,能力加強,比較年輕化,特別是戰鬥部隊的幹部更要年輕些,使我們的幹部能夠掌握一些現代化戰爭知識,並且有好的作風。

《我們的戰略方針是積極防禦》是鄧小平同志1980年10月15日在中國人民解放軍總參謀部舉辦的防衛作戰研究班全體會議上講話的一部分。指出,我們未來的反侵略戰爭,究竟採取什麼方針?我贊成就是「積極防禦」四個字。積極防禦本身不只是一個防禦,防禦中有進攻。強調,再一件事,就是抓訓練。這件事可不能放鬆。訓練可是要注意合成訓練,抓合成軍作戰訓練。不但學校注意訓練,部隊也要注意實戰訓練。

《建設強大的現代化正規化的革命軍隊》是鄧小平同志1981年9月19日在華北某地檢閱軍事演習部隊時的講話。指出,我軍是人民民主專政的堅強柱石,肩負著保衛社會主義祖國、保衛四化建設的光榮使命。必須把我軍建設成為一支強大的現代化、正規化的革命軍隊。

《軍隊要服從整個國家建設大局》是鄧小平同志1984年11月1日在中央軍委座談會上講話的一部分。指出,現在需要的是全國黨政軍民一心一意地服從國家建設這個大局,照顧這個大局。我們軍隊有自己的責任,不能妨礙這個大局,要緊密地配合這個大局,而且要在這個大局下面行動。大家都要從大局出發,照顧大局,千方百計使我們國家經濟發展。

《在軍委擴大會議上的講話》是鄧小平同志1985年6月4日的講話。指出,把中國人民解放軍的員額減少一百萬,這是中國共產黨、中國政府和中國人民有力量、有信心的表現。提出,粉碎「四人幫」以後,特別是黨的十一屆三中全會以後,我們對國際形勢的判斷有變化,對外政策也有變化,這是兩個重要的轉變。第一個轉變,是對戰爭與和平問題的認識。在較長時間內不發生大規模的世界戰爭是可能的,維護世界和平是有希望的。根據對世界大勢的這些分析,以及對我們周圍環境的分析,我們改變了原來認為戰爭的危險很迫近的看法。第二個轉變,是我們的對外政策。過去有一段時間,我們搞了「一條線」的戰略。現在我們改變了這個戰略,這是一個重大的轉變。我們奉行獨立自主的正確的外交路線和對外政策,高舉反對霸權主義、維護世界和平的旗幟,堅定地站在和平力量一邊。

《中共中央批轉中央軍委〈關於新時期軍隊政治工作的決定》的通知》是1987年2月15日印發的。指出,這個決定,以馬列主義、毛澤東思想為指導,繼承黨和軍隊政治工作的優良傳統,結合新的歷史時期軍隊的任務和麵臨的情況,對軍隊政治工作的指導思想、主要任務、方針政策和基本方法,做出了正確的闡述和規定,對於保証軍隊的革命化、現代化、正規化建設,保証軍隊完成保衛祖國、建設祖國的光榮任務,具有重要的長遠的指導作用。 《決定》就如何適應國防建設和軍隊建設的指導思想實行戰略性的轉變,做好新時期軍隊的政治工作,分七個問題作了論述。指出,人民解放軍在國家實現三大任務中肩負著重大的歷史責任,必須在新的歷史條件下加強我軍政治工作。

《會見參加中央軍委擴大會議全體同志時的講話》是鄧小平同志1989年11月12日的講話。指出,我確信,我們的軍隊能夠始終不渝地堅持自己的性質。這個性質是,黨的軍隊,人民的軍隊,社會主義國家的軍隊。這與世界各國的軍隊不同。就是與別的社會主義國家的軍隊也不同,因為他們的軍隊與我們的軍隊經歷不同。我們的軍隊始終要忠於黨,忠於人民,忠於國家,忠於社會主義。

《部隊要做到政治合格、軍事過硬、作風優良、紀律嚴明、保障有力》是江澤民同志1990年12月1日在全軍軍事工作會議上講話的一部分。指出,抓部隊建設,最根本的要把思想政治工作做好。要加強組織紀律性,保証部隊集中統一。軍事訓練是部隊平時培養作風、提升軍事素質、增強戰鬥力的一個主要手段,要把軍事訓練切實擺在戰略位置。軍訓也好,整個軍事工作也好,都應該抓實,隻有抓實,才能抓出效果。

《國際形勢與軍事戰略方針》是江澤民同志1993年1月13日在中央軍委擴大會議上講話的主要部分。指出,積極防禦的軍事戰略方針的基本內容是,以毛澤東軍事思想、鄧小平同志關於新時期軍隊建設的思想為根本指導,服從和服務於國家發展戰略,立足打贏一場可能發生的現代技術特別是高技術條件下的局部戰爭,加速我軍質量建設,努力提高我軍應急作戰能力,揚長避短,靈活應變,遏制戰爭,贏得戰爭,保衛國家領土主權和海洋權益,維護祖國統一和社會穩定,為改革開放和現代化建設提供強而有力的安全保証。

《中共中央關於轉發〈關於改革開放和發展社會主義市場經濟條件下軍隊思想政治建設若干問題的決定”的通知”是1999年8月24日印發的。指出,打贏未來高技術戰爭,維持人民軍隊的性質、本色和作風,是新時期黨對人民軍隊的最高政治要求。 《決定》指出,必須堅定不移地高舉鄧小平理論偉大旗幟,必須確保黨對軍隊的絕對領導,必須始終把思想政治建設擺在軍隊各項建設的首位,必須緊緊圍繞軍隊現代化建設這個中心,必須堅持繼承優良傳統與改革創新的統一。新的歷史條件下我軍思想政治建設的使命是:為打贏未來高技術戰爭提供強大的精神動力,為維持人民軍隊的性質、本色和作風提供可靠的政治保証。

《機械化和資訊化是我軍建設的雙重歷史任務》是江澤民同志2000年12月11日在中央軍委擴大會議上講話的一部分。指出,我們抓緊進行軍事鬥爭準備,也就抓住了當前軍隊建設的主要矛盾。要努力完成我軍機械化和資訊化建設的雙重歷史任務,著力構建適應高技術戰爭要求的現代作戰體系,堅持用改革創新精神搞好我軍以現代化為中心的全面建設,進一步完善科學決策的機制和手段。

《論中國特色軍事變革》是江澤民同志2002年12月27日在中央軍委擴大會議上的講話。指出,新軍事變革正在進入一個新的質變階段,很可能發展成為一場波及全球、涉及所有軍事領域的深刻的軍事革命,必然導致軍隊建設和作戰方式等一系列方面發生革命性變化,有可能進一步拉大我國同世界主要國家在軍事實力上的差距,增大對我國軍事安全的潛在威脅。我們要以時不我待的緊迫感,積極推進中國特色軍事變革,加快我軍由機械化半機械化向資訊化的轉變,全面提升我軍的威懾和實戰能力。

《我軍在新世紀新階段的歷史使命》是胡錦濤同志2004年12月24日在中央軍委擴大會議上講話的一部分。指出,全面分析時代發展要求和我國安全形勢變化,對於我軍在新世紀新階段的歷史使命,要從以下幾個方面加以準確把握:為黨鞏固執政地位提供重要力量保証,為維護國家發展的重要戰略機遇期提供堅強安全保障,為維護國家利益提供強大戰略支撐,為維護世界和平與促進共同發展發揮重要作用。

《向資訊化條件下軍事訓練轉變》是胡錦濤同志2006年6月27日在全軍軍事訓練會議上講話的一部分。指出,進入新世紀新階段,我軍適應戰爭形態和作戰方式發展趨勢,確立了建設資訊化軍隊、打贏資訊化戰爭的戰略目標,努力推進機械化和資訊化復合發展,軍事訓練正在經歷一場深刻變革。要根據機械化、資訊化建設實際進程和發展水平,從實際出發,分類指導,創造性開展軍事訓練,著力提高訓練質量和效果,紮紮實實推進機械化條件下軍事訓練向信息化條件下軍事訓練轉變,加速提高我軍資訊化條件下的威懾和實戰能力。

《建設與國家安全和發展利益相適應的鞏固國防和強大軍隊》是胡錦濤同志2007年12月28日在中央軍委擴大會議上講話的一部分。指出,在新的歷史起點上繼續發展中國特色社會主義,對加強國防和軍隊建設提出了新的要求。我們必須努力建設與國家國際地位相稱、與國家安全和發展利益相適應的鞏固國防和強大軍隊。富國和強軍,是發展中國特色社會主義、實現中華民族偉大復興的兩大基石。要統籌經濟建設和國防建設,在全面建設小康社會進程中實現富國和強軍的統一。

《培育當代革命軍人核心價值觀》是胡錦濤同志2008年12月24日在中央軍委擴大會議上講話的一部分。指出,當代革命軍人核心價值觀集中體現為「忠誠於黨,熱愛人民,報效國家,獻身使命,崇尚榮譽」。要堅持不懈以當代革命軍人核心價值觀引領官兵的思想和行為,引導官兵始終保持政治堅定和思想道德純潔,真正做到打得贏、不變質。要把培育當代革命軍人核心價值觀融入部隊建設方方面面,抓好思想教育、輿論引導、文化薰陶、典型示範、實踐養成、制度保障,使當代革命軍人核心價值觀為官兵普遍理解認同、自覺培養踐行。

《中共中央、國務院、中央軍委關於加強新形勢下國防教育工作的意見》是2011年4月19日印發的。指出,國防教育是建設和鞏固國防的基礎,是增強民族凝聚力、提高全民素質的重要途徑。要充分認識加強新形勢下防衛教育工作的重要性。要穩固樹立與科學發展觀要求相適應的國防觀,突顯抓好各級領導幹部的國防教育,大力推動社會各界普及國防教育,積極改進和創新國防教育的方法手段,努力為普及國防教育提供政策支持與相關保障,切實加強國防教育工作的組織領導。

《牢牢把握強軍目標,建設一支強大人民軍隊》是習近平同志2013年3月11日在十二屆全國人大一次會議解放軍代表團全體會議上講話的一部分。指出,黨在新形勢下的強軍目標是建立一支聽黨指揮、能打勝仗、作風優良的人民軍隊。聽黨指揮是靈魂,決定軍隊建設的政治方向﹔能打勝仗是核心,反映軍隊的根本職能和軍隊建設的根本指向﹔作風優良是保証,關系軍隊的性質、宗旨、本色。這個目標明確了加強軍隊建設的聚焦點和著力點,全軍要準確把握,用以統領軍隊建設、改革和軍事鬥爭準備,努力把國防和軍隊建設提高到一個新水平。

《深化國防與軍隊改革》是2013年11月12日中國共產黨第十八屆中央委員會第三次全體會議通過的《中共中央關於全面深化改革若干重大問題的決定》的第十五部分。指出,要緊緊圍繞黨在新形勢下的強軍目標,著力解決制約國防和軍隊建設發展的突出矛盾和問題,創新發展軍事理論,加強軍事戰略指導,完善新時期軍事戰略方針,構建中國特色現代軍事力量體系。

《切實加強和改進新形勢下我軍政治工作》是習近平同志2014年10月31日在全軍政治工作會議上講話的一部分。指出,必須緊緊圍繞我軍政治工作的時代主題,加強和改進新形勢下我軍政治工作,充分發揮政治工作對強軍興軍的生命線作用。最緊要的是把理想信念、黨性原則、戰鬥力標準、政治工作威信四個帶根本性的東西在全軍牢固立起來。強調,堅持黨對軍隊絕對領導是強軍之魂,鑄牢軍魂是我軍政治工作的核心任務。要把握新形勢下鑄魂育人的特點和規律,著力培養有靈魂、有本事、有血性、有品德的新一代革命軍人。

《全面實施改革強軍戰略,堅定不移走中國特色強軍之路》是習近平同志2015年11月24日在中央軍委改革工作會議上講話的一部分。指出,深化國防和軍隊改革是實現中國夢強軍夢的時代要求,是強軍興軍的必經之路,也是決定軍隊未來的關鍵一招。要依照「四個全面」戰略佈局要求,以黨在新形勢下的強軍目標為引領,貫徹新形勢下軍事戰略方針,全面實施改革強軍戰略,著力解決制約國防和軍隊建設的體制性障礙、結構性矛盾、政策性問題,推進軍隊組織形態現代化,進一步解放和發展戰鬥力,進一步解放和增強軍隊活力,建設同我國國際地位相稱、同國家安全和發展利益相適應的鞏固國防和強大軍隊,為實現「兩個一百年」奮鬥目標、實現中華民族偉大復興的中國夢提供堅強力量保証。強調,軍委管總、戰區主戰、軍種主建,是領導指揮體制改革的總原則。

《全面實施創新驅動發展戰略,推動國防和軍隊建設實現新跨越》是習近平同志2016年3月13日在十二屆全國人大四次會議解放軍代表團全體會議上講話的一部分。指出,創新能力是一支軍隊的核心競爭力,也是產生和提升戰鬥力的加速器。靠改革創新推動國防和軍隊建設實現新跨越,是決定我軍前途命運的關鍵。必須下大氣力抓理論創新、科技創新、科學管理、人才集聚、實踐創新,以重點突破帶動與推進全面創新,不斷開創強軍興軍新局面。

《關於軍委堅持主席負責制》是習近平同志2017年2月4日在中央軍委民主生活會上講話的一部分。指出,我們黨的製度是黨的領袖擔任中央軍委主席,就是為了確保實現黨對軍隊絕對領導。對這項制度的極端重要性,我們要從黨、國家和軍隊興旺發達、長治久安的高度來認識。主席負責制解決的是我軍最高領導權和指揮權問題,就是軍委會主席對我軍重大問題最後拍板、一錘定音。貫徹主席負責制,全軍頭腦要特別清醒、行動要特別自覺,重大問題要請示報告。

《在慶祝中國人民解放軍建軍九十週年大會上的講話》是習近平同志2017年8月1日的講話。指出,站在新的歷史起點上,必須加快把人民軍隊建設成世界一流軍隊。推進強軍事業,必須毫不動搖堅持黨對軍隊的絕對領導,確保人民軍隊永遠跟黨走﹔必須堅持和發展黨的軍事指導理論,不斷開拓馬克思主義軍事理論和當代中國軍事實踐發展新境界﹔必須始終聚焦備戰打仗,鍛造召之即來、來之能戰、戰之必勝的精兵勁旅﹔必須堅持政治建軍、改革強軍、科技興軍、依法治軍,全面提高國防和軍隊現代化水平﹔必須深入推進軍民融合發展,建構軍民一體化的國家戰略體系和能力﹔必須堅持全心全意為人民服務的根本宗旨,始終做人民信賴、人民擁護、人民熱愛的子弟兵。

《堅持走中國特色強軍之路,全面推進國防和軍隊現代化》是習近平同志2017年10月18日在中國共產黨第十九次全國代表大會上報告的一部分。指出,面對國家安全環境的深刻變化,面對強國強軍的時代要求,必須全面貫徹新時代黨的強軍思想,貫徹新形勢下軍事戰略方針,建設強大的現代化陸軍、海軍、空軍、火箭軍和戰略支援部隊,打造堅強高效的戰區聯合作戰指揮機構,建立中國特色現代作戰體系,擔當起黨和人民賦予的新時代使命任務。

《不斷開創當代中國馬克思主義軍事理論和軍事實踐發展新境界》是習近平同志2017年12月22日在中央軍委擴大會議上講話的一部分。指出,在波瀾壯闊的強軍實踐中,我們著眼於實現中華民族偉大復興的中國夢,圍繞新時代建設一支什麼樣的強大人民軍隊、怎樣建設強大人民軍隊,深入進行理論探索和實踐創造,形成了新時代黨的強軍思想。明確強國必須強軍,鞏固國防和強大人民軍隊是新時代堅持和發展中國特色社會主義、實現中華民族偉大復興的戰略支撐﹔明確黨在新時代的強軍目標是建設一支聽黨指揮、能打勝仗、作風優良的人民軍隊,必須與國家現代化進程相一致,力爭到2035年基本實現國防和軍隊現代化,到本世紀中葉把人民軍隊全面建成世界一流軍隊﹔明確黨對軍隊的絕對領導是人民軍隊建軍之本、強軍之魂,必須全面貫徹黨領導軍隊的一系列根本原則和製度,確保部隊絕對忠誠、絕對純潔、絕對可靠﹔明確軍隊是要準備打仗的,必須聚焦能打仗、打勝仗,創新發展軍事戰略指導,建構中國特色現代作戰體系,全面提升新時代備戰打仗能力,有效塑造態勢、管控危機、遏制戰爭、打贏戰爭﹔明確作風優良是我軍鮮明特色和政治優勢,必須加強作風建設、紀律建設,堅定不移正風肅紀、反腐懲惡,大力弘揚我黨我軍光榮傳統和優良作風,永葆人民軍隊性質、宗旨、本色﹔明確推進強軍事業必須堅持政治建軍、改革強軍、科技興軍、依法治軍,更重視聚焦實戰、更重視創新驅動、更重視體系建設、更重視集約高效、更加重視軍民融合,全面提升革命化現代化正規化水準﹔明確改革是強軍的必經之路,必須推進軍隊組織形態現代化,建構中國特色現代軍事力量體系,完善中國特色社會主義軍事制度﹔明確創新是引領發展的第一動力,必須堅持向科技創新要戰鬥力,統籌推進軍事理論、技術、組織、管理、文化等各方面創新,建設創新型人民軍隊﹔明確現代化軍隊必須建構中國特色軍事法治體系,推動治軍方式根本性轉變,提高國防與軍隊建設法治化水準﹔明確軍民融合發展是興國之舉、強軍之策,必須堅持發展和安全兼顧、富國和強軍統一,形成全要素、多領域、高效益軍民融合深度發展格局,建構一體化的國家戰略體系與能力。對新時代黨的強軍思想,要全面準確學習領會,毫不動搖貫徹落實。

《毫不動搖堅持黨對軍隊的絕對領導》是習近平同志2018年8月17日在中央軍委黨的建設會議上講話的一部分。指出,堅持黨對軍隊的絕對領導,首先全軍對黨要絕對忠誠。要做到對黨絕對忠誠,必須鑄牢聽黨話、跟黨走的思想根基。要加強忠誠度鑒別和政治考察,確保槍桿子牢牢掌握在對黨絕對忠誠的人手中。

《堅持並完善黨對人民軍隊的絕對領導制度,確保人民軍隊忠實履行新時代使命任務》是2019年10月31日中國共產黨第十九屆中央委員會第四次全體會議通過的《中共中央關於堅持和完善中國特色社會主義制度、推進國家治理體系和治理能力現代化若干重大問題的決定》的第十一部分。指出,黨對人民軍隊的絕對領導是人民軍隊的建軍之本、強軍之魂。中央軍委實行主席負責制是堅持黨對人民軍隊絕對領導的根本實現形式。必須牢固確立習近平強軍思想在國防和軍隊建設中的指導地位,堅持人民軍隊最高領導權和指揮權屬於黨中央,健全人民軍隊黨的建設製度體系,把黨對人民軍隊的絕對領導貫徹到軍隊建設各領域全過程。

《全面加強實戰化軍事訓練,全面提升訓練水準和打贏能力》是習近平同志2020年11月25日在中央軍委軍事訓練會議上講話的要點。指出,軍訓是部隊經常性中心工作,是產生和提升戰鬥力的基本途徑,是最直接的軍事鬥爭準備。要堅持聚焦備戰打仗,堅持實戰實訓、聯戰聯訓、科技強訓、依法治訓,發揚優良傳統,強化改革創新,加速建構新型軍事訓練體系,全面提升訓練水準和打贏能力,為實現黨在新時代的強軍目標、把我軍全面建成世界一流軍隊提供堅強支撐。

《推動新時代國防與軍隊建設取得歷史性成就、發生歷史性變革》節自2021年11月11日中國共產黨第十九屆中央委員會第六次全體會議通過的《中共中央關於黨的百年奮鬥重大成就與歷史經驗的決議》的第四部分「開創中國特色社會主義新時代」。指出,黨的十八大以來,黨提出新時代的強軍目標,確立新時代軍事戰略方針,制定到2027年實現建軍一百年奮鬥目標、到2035年基本實現國防和軍隊現代化、到本世紀中葉全面建成世界一流軍隊的國防與軍隊現代化新「三步驟」戰略,推進政治建軍、改革強軍、科技強軍、人才強軍、依法治軍,加速軍事理論現代化、軍隊組織形態現代化、軍事人員現代化、武器裝備現代化,加速機械化資訊化智慧化融合發展,全面加強練兵備戰,堅持走中國特色強軍之路。在黨的堅強領導下,人民軍隊實現整體性革命性重塑、重整行裝再出發,國防實力和經濟實力同步提升,一體化國家戰略體系和能力加快構建,建立健全退役軍人管理保障體制,國防動員更加高效,軍政軍民團結更加鞏固。人民軍隊堅決履行新時代使命任務,以頑強鬥爭精神和實際行動捍衛了國家主權、安全、發展利益。

《深入實施新時代人才強軍戰略》是習近平同志2021年11月26日在中央軍委人才工作會議上講話的要點。指出,人才是推動我軍高品質發展、贏得軍事競爭和未來戰爭主動的關鍵因素。實施新時代人才強軍戰略,必須把黨對軍隊絕對領導貫徹到人才工作各方面和全過程,必須把能打仗、打勝仗作為人才工作出發點和落腳點,必鬚麵向世界軍事前沿、面向國家安全重大需求、面向國防與軍隊現代化,必須全方位培養用好人才,必須深化軍事人力資源政策制度改革,必須貫徹人才強國戰略。

《貫徹依法治軍戰略,提高國防和軍隊建設法治化水準》是習近平同志2022年3月7日在出席十三屆全國人大五次會議解放軍和武警部隊代表團全體會議時講話的要點。指出,依法治軍是我們黨建軍治軍的基本方式,是實現黨在新時代的強軍目標的必然要求。要堅持黨對軍隊絕對領導,堅持戰鬥力標準,堅持建設中國特色軍事法治體系,堅持按照法治要求轉變治軍方式,堅持從嚴治軍鐵律,堅持抓住領導幹部這個“關鍵少數”,堅持官兵主體地位,堅持貫徹全面依法治國要求。

《實現建軍一百年奮鬥目標,開創國防和軍隊現代化新局面》是習近平同志2022年10月16日在中國共產黨第二十次全國代表大會上報告的一部分。指出,如期實現建軍一百年奮鬥目標,加速把人民軍隊建成世界一流軍隊,是全面建設社會主義現代化國家的戰略要求。必須貫徹新時代黨的強軍思想,貫徹新時代軍事戰略方針,堅持黨對人民軍隊的絕對領導,堅持政治建軍、改革強軍、科技強軍、人才強軍、依法治軍,堅持邊鬥爭、邊備戰、邊建設,堅持機械化資訊化智慧化融合發展,加速軍事理論現代化、軍隊組織形態現代化、軍事人員現代化、武器裝備現代化,提升捍衛國家主權、安全、發展利益戰略能力,有效履行新時代人民軍隊使命任務。

2023年07月31日06:27 | 來源:人民網-人民日報

中國共產黨原文來源:https://politics.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2023/0731/c1001-40046776.html

Chinese Intelligent Warfare is Accelerating and Advancing

中國智能化戰爭正在加速推進

中國軍網 國防部網. 2022年3月17日 星期四

現代英語:

With the widespread application of artificial intelligence in the military field, intelligent warfare has gradually become a hot topic. History has repeatedly proved that the evolution of war forms will lead to profound changes in the winning mechanism. In today’s era when information warfare is developing in depth and intelligent warfare is beginning to emerge, the armies of major countries in the world have made great efforts to promote military intelligence, and many of these trends are worthy of attention.

Strengthen top-level design

Outlining a “roadmap” for intelligent warfare

Driven by a new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial revolution, intelligent military transformation is developing in depth. The United States, Russia, Japan and other countries have regarded artificial intelligence as a disruptive technology that “changes the rules of the war game” and have made early arrangements, strengthened top-level design and planning guidance, and explored the direction of military application of artificial intelligence.

The U.S. military has detailed the current status and development plan of artificial intelligence in documents such as “Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence”, “National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan”, “Artificial Intelligence and National Security”, “Integrated Roadmap for Unmanned Systems, Fiscal Year 2017-2042”, and “American Artificial Intelligence Initiative: First Annual Report”, and has elevated the development of artificial intelligence to the national strategic level. In 2021, the U.S. military pointed out in its “U.S. Department of Defense Artificial Intelligence Posture: Assessment and Improvement Recommendations” that the U.S. military should consider three guiding questions in developing artificial intelligence: what is the current state of artificial intelligence related to the U.S. military; what is the current situation of the U.S. military in artificial intelligence; and what internal actions and potential legislative or regulatory actions may enhance the U.S. military’s artificial intelligence advantage.

Russia has invested a lot of resources to maintain a balance with the United States in the competition for the application of artificial intelligence in the military field. In 2021, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated at the first Defense Ministry meeting of the year that artificial intelligence will greatly promote changes in the military field, and the Russian Federation Armed Forces must accelerate the research and development of artificial intelligence application technologies such as robots, intelligent individual systems, and intelligent weapon modules, so as to form core technical capabilities and battlefield competitive advantages as soon as possible. Documents such as “Special Outline for the Research and Development of Future Military Robot Technology and Equipment before 2025”, “Future Russian Military Robot Application Concept”, and “The Development Status and Application Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in the Military Field” have established a series of mechanisms at the national level for the Russian military to promote the military application of artificial intelligence.

The Japanese government has also issued an “Artificial Intelligence Strategy” to lead the research and development of artificial intelligence technology and industrial development. In the “Robotics and Artificial Intelligence” strategic plan formulated by the United Kingdom, the application of artificial intelligence in battlefield construction is emphasized. In January 2021, the Australian Department of Defense released “Fighting the Artificial Intelligence War: Operational Concepts for Future Intelligent Warfare”, which explores how to apply artificial intelligence to land, sea and air combat.

Innovative combat concepts

Promoting the “Thinking First” Approach to Intelligent Warfare

The innovation of operational concepts has an ideological driving effect on the development of military science and technology and the evolution of war forms. In the past, people’s understanding and grasp of war mainly came from the summary of practical experience, and operational concepts were empirical concepts. In the future era of intelligent warfare, operational concepts are not only empirical concepts, but also the conception, design and foresight of operations.

The U.S. Army has proposed the concept of “multi-domain warfare”, which requires deep integration and close coordination of combat capabilities in various domains such as land, sea, air, space, electromagnetic, and network. To this end, the U.S. Army has successively issued white papers such as “Multi-Domain Warfare: The Development of Synthetic Arms in the 21st Century (2025-2040)”, “U.S. Army Multi-Domain Warfare (2028)”, and “Using Robotics and Autonomous Technologies to Support Multi-Domain Warfare”. In March 2021, the U.S. Department of the Army issued the document “Army Multi-Domain Transformation: Preparing to Win in Competition and Conflict”, indicating that “multi-domain warfare” has become a “flag” leading the transformation and development of the U.S. Army. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency proposed the concept of “mosaic warfare”, which aims to create a highly decentralized and highly adaptable “kill net” composed of different combat functional units, based on advanced computer technology and network technology. The U.S. Department of Defense strongly supports the concept of “joint all-domain operations”. In March 2020, the U.S. Air Force took the lead in writing “joint all-domain operations” into the doctrine to explore how the Air Force can play a role in “joint all-domain operations”.

The Russian military proposed the concept of “charge disintegration”. “Disintegration” is one of the most important operational concepts in Russia at present. The Russian electronic warfare forces set the goal of making the enemy’s information, charge, electronic warfare and robot systems ineffective, and believe that this goal will “determine the fate of all military operations”. Disrupting the command and control of enemy forces and weapon systems and reducing the efficiency of enemy reconnaissance and use of weapons are the primary tasks of electronic warfare. At present, the Russian military is considering forming 12 types of electronic warfare forces. The Russian military also proposed the concept of “non-nuclear containment system”, the core of which is to use non-nuclear offensive strategic weapons to contain opponents. The non-nuclear offensive strategic weapons it defines include all ballistic missiles equipped with non-nuclear warheads, as well as strategic bombers and long-range air-based and sea-based cruise missiles. In addition, the Russian military also proposed the concept of “hybrid warfare”, hoping to use artificial intelligence systems to seek battlefield information advantages.

The British Ministry of Defense has proposed the concept of “multi-domain integration” and will develop a new command and control system with intelligent capabilities to achieve comprehensive, persistent, accurate and rapid battlefield perception and force coordination.

Focus on technology research and development

Shaping the Intelligent Warfare Operational Model

The key to the effectiveness of artificial intelligence is the combination with other technologies, which is also described as the “AI stack”. Various technologies interact to produce a combined effect, thereby enhancing the capabilities and effects of each technology. In the intelligent warfare supported by artificial intelligence technology, the collaborative combat mode of “man-machine integration, cloud brain control”, the cluster combat mode of “mixed formation, group intelligence”, and the cognitive combat mode of “intelligence-led, attacking with intelligence first” will constantly update people’s understanding of war.

Focus on the research and development of innovative projects. The US military is vigorously promoting the application of artificial intelligence chips in existing weapons and equipment systems, adding “intelligent brains” to weapons to enable them to have human-like thinking and autonomous interaction capabilities. In October 2021, the US Navy launched the “Beyond Plan”, which is regarded as the “current highest priority”. It aims to accelerate the delivery of artificial intelligence and machine learning tools by building a military Internet of Things for maritime operations, integrating manned and unmanned joint formations, supporting a new intelligent naval architecture, enhancing large-scale firepower killing, and realizing intelligent distributed operations of the navy. In addition, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has also carried out cognitive electronic warfare projects such as “Adaptive Electronic Warfare Behavior Learning”, “Adaptive Radar Countermeasures”, and “Communications under Extreme Radio Frequency Spectrum Conditions”, and developed a prototype of a cognitive radar electronic warfare system. The Russian Ministry of Defense’s Intelligent Technology and Equipment Research and Experimental Center cooperated with the Institute of Control Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences to develop and test autonomous intelligent algorithms including drone swarm command and control, and also jointly developed an object automatic recognition software system based on neural network principles with the National Aviation System Research Institute.

Establish innovative R&D institutions. The continuous emergence of new technologies is an inexhaustible driving force for the vigorous development of military intelligence. High-level military intelligence construction cannot be separated from the technical research and development of professional institutions. Some countries and militaries have established R&D centers, focusing on innovative development from a technical level. The U.S. Department of Defense has established a joint artificial intelligence center, which is planned to be built into a national key laboratory to lead the promotion of hundreds of artificial intelligence-related projects and ensure the efficient use of artificial intelligence-related data and information to maintain the United States’ technological advantage in this field. Russia has established an artificial intelligence and big data alliance, a national artificial intelligence center, and a robotics technology research and experimental center under the Ministry of Defense, mainly conducting theoretical and applied research in the fields of artificial intelligence and information technology. France has established an innovative defense laboratory, the United Kingdom has set up an artificial intelligence laboratory, and India has established an artificial intelligence task force to explore related technologies.

Strengthen equipment research and development and deployment. In recent years, many countries have attached great importance to the research and development of intelligent weapons and equipment, and unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned combat vehicles, unmanned ships, unmanned submarines, etc. have continued to emerge. At present, the US Air Force has begun to practice the combat concept of “man-machine collaboration, man in the loop” on the F-35 fighter. The US XQ-58A “Valkyrie” stealth drone previously mainly carried out man-machine collaborative operations with F-35 and F-22 fighters. In April 2021, the stealth drone successfully launched the ALTIUS-600 small drone system, further enhancing its manned and unmanned collaborative combat capabilities. Russia is focusing on reconnaissance and surveillance, command and decision-making, firepower strikes, combat support and other fields, and is developing and deploying intelligent equipment. It plans to increase the proportion of unmanned combat systems in weapons and equipment to more than 30% by 2025. Russia’s ground unmanned combat weapons, represented by the “Uranus” series and “Platform-M” and “Argo” models, are developing rapidly. Among them, the Nerekhta unmanned combat vehicle can be equipped with remote-controlled machine guns and rocket launchers. In addition to the combat capabilities of ordinary armored vehicles, it also has transportation and reconnaissance functions. In addition, the Japanese Self-Defense Forces plan to officially deploy an unmanned aerial formation with strong combat capabilities in 2035.

(Author’s unit: National University of Defense Technology)

國語中文:

■賈珍珍 丁 寧 陳方舟

隨著人工智慧在軍事領域的廣泛應用,智慧化戰爭逐漸成為備受矚目的焦點話題。歷史多次證明,戰爭形態的演進將引發致勝機理的深刻改變。在資訊化戰爭向縱深發展、智慧化戰爭初露端倪的當今時代,世界主要國家軍隊紛紛下大力推動軍事智慧化,其中的諸多動向值得關注。

加強頂層設計

勾勒智能化戰爭“路線圖”

在新一輪科技革命與產業革命推動下,智慧化軍事變革正向縱深發展。美國、俄羅斯、日本等國紛紛把人工智慧視為「改變戰爭遊戲規則」的顛覆性技術,並事先佈局,加強頂層設計和規劃引領,探索人工智慧的軍事應用方向。

美軍在《為人工智慧的未來做好準備》《國家人工智慧研究與發展戰略計畫》《人工智慧與國家安全》《2017至2042財年無人係統綜合路線圖》《美國人工智慧計畫》:在首個年度報告》等文件中,詳述了人工智慧的發展現狀和發展規劃,並將人工智慧發展提升至國家戰略層面。 2021年,美軍在發布的《美國防部人工智慧態勢:評估與改進建議》中指出,美軍發展人工智慧應考慮三個指導性問題:與美軍相關的人工智慧現處於何種狀態;美軍目前在人工智慧方面的態勢如何;哪些內部行動以及潛在的立法或監管行動可能會增強美軍的人工智慧優勢。

俄羅斯投入大量資源,以維持與美國在人工智慧軍事領域應用競爭的平衡。 2021年,俄總統普丁在年度首場國防部會議上表示,人工智慧將大幅推動軍事領域變革,俄國聯邦武裝力量要加速機器人、智慧單兵系統和武器智慧化模組等人工智慧應用技術的研發工作,早日形成核心技術能力和戰場競爭優勢。 《2025年前未來軍用機器人技術裝備研發專題綱要》《未來俄軍用機器人應用構想》《人工智慧在軍事領域的發展現狀以及應用前景》等文件,從國家層面為俄軍推動人工智慧軍事應用確立了一系列機制。

日本政府也推出了《人工智慧戰略》,旨在引領人工智慧技術研發和產業發展。在英國制定的《機器人與人工智慧》戰略規劃中,強調了人工智慧在戰場建設中的應用。 2021年1月,澳洲國防部發布《打好人工智慧戰爭:未來智慧化戰爭之作戰構想》,這份文件探討如何將人工智慧應用到陸、海、空作戰領域。

創新作戰概念

推動智慧化戰爭“思想先行”

作戰概念創新對軍事科技發展、戰爭形態演變具有思想牽引作用。過去人們對戰爭的認識與掌握,主要源自於對實踐經驗的歸納總結,作戰概念即經驗概念。未來智慧化戰爭時代,作戰概念不僅是經驗概念,更是對作戰的構想、設計與前瞻。

美陸軍提出「多域戰」概念,要求陸、海、空、天、電磁、網路等各域作戰能力深度整合與密切協同。為此,美陸軍先後發布《多域戰:21世紀合成兵種的發展(2025至2040)》《美國陸軍多域戰(2028)》《運用機器人與自主技術支援多域戰》等白皮書。 2021年3月,美陸軍部發布文件《陸軍多域轉型:準備在競爭和衝突中取勝》,顯示「多域戰」已成為引領美陸軍轉型發展的一面「旗幟」。美國防高級研究計畫局提出「馬賽克戰」概念,旨在打造一種由不同作戰功能單元構成的、以先進電腦技術與網路技術為基礎的、高度分散、具有高度適應性的「殺傷網」。美國防部大力支持「聯合全域作戰」概念。 2020年3月,美空軍率先將「聯合全域作戰」寫入條令,探討空軍如何在「聯合全域作戰」中發揮作用。

俄軍提出「指控瓦解」概念。 「瓦解」是當前俄羅斯最重要的作戰概念之一,俄軍電子戰部隊把使敵人的訊息、指控、電子戰和機器人系統失效作為目標,認為這一目標將「決定所有軍事行動的命運」。擾亂敵方部隊和武器系統的指揮和控制,降低敵方偵察和使用武器的效率,是進行電子戰的首要任務。目前,俄軍正在考慮組建12種類型的電子戰部隊。俄軍也提出「非核武遏制體系」概念,核心是使用非核武進攻性戰略武器來遏制對手。其所定義的非核武攻擊性戰略武器既包括所有裝備非核彈頭的彈道飛彈,也包括戰略轟炸機和遠程空基、海基巡航飛彈。此外,俄軍也提出「混合戰爭」概念,希望利用人工智慧系統謀求戰場資訊優勢。

英國防部提出「多域融合」概念,將發展具備智慧化能力的新型指控系統,以實現全面、持久、準確、快速的戰場感知與力量協同。

注重技術研發

塑造智慧化戰爭作戰模式

人工智慧發揮效用的關鍵是與其他多種技術的組合,這種組合也被描述為「人工智慧堆疊」。各種技術透過互動的方式產生組合效應,進而提升每項技術所產生的能力與效果。在人工智慧技術支援的智慧化戰爭中,「人機一體、雲腦控制」的協同作戰模式,「混搭編組、群體智慧」的集群作戰模式,「智慧主導、攻智為上」的認知作戰模式等,將不斷更新人們對戰爭的認知。

聚焦創新專案研發。美軍正在大力推廣人工智慧晶片在現有武器裝備系統中的應用,為武器加上“智慧大腦”,使之具備類人思考和自主互動能力。 2021年10月,美海軍推出被視為“當前最高優先事項”的“超越計劃”,旨在通過構建海上作戰軍事物聯網,整合有人無人聯合編隊,加速交付人工智能和機器學習工具,支撐全新的智慧化海軍架構,提升大規模火力殺傷、實現海軍智慧化分散式作戰。此外,美國防高級研究計畫局也進行了「自適應電子戰行為學習」「自適應雷達對抗」「極端射頻頻譜條件下的通訊」等認知電子戰項目,研發出認知雷達電子戰系統原型機。俄國防部智慧技術裝備科研試驗中心與俄聯邦科學院控制問題研究所合作,開發測試了包括無人機群指揮控制在內的自主智慧演算法,也與國家航空系統科研所共同開發基於神經網路原理的物體自動辨識軟體系統。

組成創新研發機構。新技術的不斷湧現是軍事智慧化蓬勃發展的不竭動力,高水準的軍事智慧化建設離不開專職機構的技術研發。一些國家和軍隊組成研發中心,注重從技術層面創新發展。美國國防部建立了聯合人工智慧中心,計劃將該中心打造成國家級重點實驗室,用於領導數百個與人工智慧相關的項目,確保對人工智慧相關數據資訊的高效利用,以保持美國在該領域的技術優勢。俄羅斯組成了人工智慧和大數據聯盟、國家人工智慧中心和隸屬國防部的機器人技術科研試驗中心,主要進行人工智慧和資訊科技領域的理論和應用研究。法國成立了創新國防實驗室,英國設立了人工智慧實驗室,印度組成了人工智慧特別工作小組,進行相關技術探索。

加強裝備研發列裝。近年來,多國重視研發智慧武器裝備,無人飛行器、無人戰車、無人艦艇、無人潛航器等不斷湧現。目前,美空軍已開始在F-35戰機上實踐「人機協同,人在迴路」的作戰理念。美XQ-58A「女武神」隱身無人機先前主要與F-35和F-22戰機進行人機協同作戰,2021年4月該隱身無人機成功投放ALTIUS-600小型無人機系統,進一步提升了其有人無人協同作戰能力。俄羅斯正聚焦偵察監視、指揮決策、火力打擊、作戰支援等多個領域,展開智慧裝備研發和列裝工作,計畫到2025年將無人作戰系統在武器裝備中的比例提高到30%以上。以“天王星”系列和“平台-M”“阿爾戈”等型號為代表的俄地面無人作戰武器發展迅速。其中,Nerekhta無人戰車可搭載遙控機槍和火箭發射器,除擁有一般裝甲車的戰鬥力外,還兼具運輸和偵察功能。此外,日本自衛隊計劃在2035年正式部署具有較強作戰能力的無人空中編隊。

(作者單位:國防科技大學)

中國軍事資料來源:https://www.81.cn/jfjbmap/content/2022-03/17/content_311555.htm

How the Chinese Military Identify Key Targets for Cognitive Domain Operations

中國軍隊如何辨識認知域作戰的關鍵目標

現代英語:

Cognitive domain combat targets refer to the specific role of cognitive domain combat. In cognitive domain combat, compared with combat targets, combat targets solve the problem of precise aiming, that is, to let commanders understand and grasp the precise coordinates of what to hit, where to hit, and to what extent. Only by deeply understanding the connotation and characteristics of cognitive domain combat targets can we accurately find key targets through appearances and thus seize the initiative in future combat.

Cognitive focus that influences behavioral choices

The cognitive focus is the “convergence point” of the cognitive subject’s multi-dimensional thinking cognition in war activities. As a dynamic factor, it affects the cognitive process and behavioral results. Generally speaking, the cognitive factors that affect individual behavioral choices in war activities mainly include political attribute cognition, interest-related cognition, group belonging cognition, risk loss cognition, emotional orientation cognition, war morality cognition, etc. For war activities and groups or individuals who pay attention to war activities, the cognitive focus that affects their attitudes, tendencies and behaviors is not the same. Judging from the local wars and regional conflicts in the world in recent years, there are obvious differences in the cognitive focus of different groups or individuals. Politicians pay more attention to political attribute cognition and interest-related cognition, those who may intervene in the war pay more attention to risk loss cognition and interest-related cognition, ordinary people pay more attention to interest-related cognition and emotional orientation cognition, and people in other countries outside the region generally pay more attention to war morality cognition and group belonging cognition because their own interests will not be directly lost. In combat practice, foreign militaries are good at targeting the cognitive focus of different objects, accurately planning topics, and pushing related information to induce specific behavioral choices. For example, before the Gulf War, the Hill Norton public relations company fabricated the non-existent “incubator incident” by using Naira, the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States, as a “witness” to show the “inhumanity” of the Iraqi army, induce the American people’s ethical and moral cognition, and then support the US government to send troops to participate in the Gulf War.

Style preferences that constrain command decisions

Cognitive style directly affects decision-making behavior preferences. Cognitive style refers to the typical way of individual cognition, memory, thinking, and problem solving. According to the preference of command decision-making style, commanders can be divided into calm cognitive style and impulsive cognitive style. Commanders with calm cognitive style pay attention to accuracy but not speed in the decision-making process. The quality of the decisions they make is high, but they are prone to fall into the comparison and analysis of various intelligence information sources and overemphasize the accuracy and objectivity of information analysis. Commanders with calm cognitive style are often easily disturbed by the diverse and diverse information stimulation in battlefield cognitive offensive and defensive operations, and their mental energy is easily disturbed and dissipated, which may lead to missed opportunities. Commanders with impulsive cognitive style pay attention to speed but not accuracy. The decision-making reaction speed is fast, but the quality is not high. They are easily emotional and prone to conflict with team members. Commanders with impulsive cognitive style are also prone to over-interpret the ambiguous external security environment, and constantly look for “evidence” to strengthen and verify individual erroneous thinking, narrowing individual attention and leading to command decision-making deviations. In combat practice, foreign armies pay more attention to analyzing the decision-making style of commanders of combat opponents, and then select specific information to influence them psychologically. For example, during the U.S. invasion of Panama, when besieging the hiding place of Panamanian President Noriega, the U.S. military repeatedly played rock and heavy metal music, and used language that stimulated and humiliated Noriega to carry out cognitive and psychological attacks on him, causing Noriega to gradually collapse physically and mentally.

Backdoor channel to control thinking and cognition

Once a computer is infected with a “Trojan” virus, it will send a connection request to the hacker control terminal at a specific time. Once the connection is successful, a backdoor channel will be formed, allowing the hacker to control the computer at will. Similarly, the human brain also has a cognitive “backdoor” and may be controlled by others. Cognitive psychologists have found that by sending information to the target object’s audio-visual perception channel, carefully pushing information content that the target object recognizes and accepts, catering to the target object’s existing experience memory, conforming to the target object’s thinking habits, and stimulating the target object’s emotional pain points, it is possible to control and interfere with the target object’s cognition and promote its instinctive emotional and behavioral reactions. With the support of cutting-edge cognitive science and technology, using the two modes of automatic start and control processing of brain information processing, the target object can easily fall into a “cognitive cocoon”. In cognitive domain operations, by immersing individuals in massive amounts of artificially constructed information, and continuously providing them with “evidence” to prove that their judgments and cognitions are “correct”. Over time, the individual’s cognitive vision becomes smaller and smaller, and the ability to perceive the external environment gradually decreases. Eventually, they will not be able to see the truth of the matter and will be immersed in the “cognitive cocoon” and unable to extricate themselves. When foreign militaries conduct operations in the cognitive domain, they often target their opponents’ cognitive biases on a certain issue and continuously push situational information and intelligence information through various channels to support their opponents’ so-called “correct cognition,” causing errors and deviations in their opponents’ command decisions.

Sensory stimuli that induce attention

Effective perceptual stimulation is the first prerequisite for attracting the attention of the target object. The human brain will perceive and react to stimuli within the perceptual range. Cognitive psychology experimental research has found that information such as dynamic, dangerous, relevant, survival safety, and contrast between before and after is more likely to attract the attention of the human brain. In the era of intelligence, the psychological cognitive process of the target object often follows the law of “attracting attention, cultivating interest, actively searching, strengthening memory, actively sharing, and influencing others”. In combat, foreign troops often use exclusive revelations, intelligence leaks, authoritative disclosures, on-site connections, and other methods, and cleverly use exaggeration, contrast, association, metaphor, suspense, and contrast to push information that subverts common sense, cognitive conflicts, and strong contrasts to attract the attention of the target object. For example, the “Lin Qi rescue incident” created by the US military in the Iraq War and the “Gaddafi Golden Toilet” in the Libyan War mostly choose stories familiar to the audience as the blueprint, hiding the purpose and embedding the viewpoint in the story plot, which attracted the attention of the general public. In addition, the human brain will also process stimuli outside the perceptual range. In recent years, the military of Western countries has attached great importance to the research of subthreshold information stimulation technology, and has developed subthreshold visual information implantation technology, subthreshold auditory information implantation technology, subthreshold information activation technology, subconscious sound manipulation technology of the nervous system, etc., continuously expanding the application scope of neurocognitive science and technology in the military field.

Meta-value concepts that give rise to cognitive resonance

In cognitive theory, cognitive resonance refers to information that can cross the cognitive gap between the two parties and trigger the ideological and psychological resonance and cognitive empathy of both parties, thereby achieving the deconstruction and reconstruction of the other party’s cognitive system. In cognitive domain warfare, this cognitive energy-gathering effect is not a simple concentration of power, but an internal accumulation of system synergy. Under the diffusion and dissemination of modern information media, this cognitive resonance effect can spread rapidly to all parts of the world in a short period of time, and produce secondary indirect psychological effects or more levels of derivative psychological effects, presenting a state of cumulative iteration. Once it exceeds the psychological critical point, it will present a state of psychological energy explosion, thereby changing the direction or outcome of the event. The targets that can induce this cognitive resonance are mainly value beliefs, moral ethics, common interests, etc. In war, if one party touches or violates human meta-values, common emotional orientation, etc., it is very easy to induce collective condemnation, bear the accusation of violating human morality, and fall into a moral trough. For example, a photo during the Vietnam War shows a group of Vietnamese children, especially a 9-year-old girl, running naked on the road because of burns after being attacked by US napalm bombs. In 1972, this photo caused a huge sensation after it was published, setting off an anti-war wave in the United States and even the world, and accelerating the end of the Vietnam War.

Cognitive gaps in a split cognitive system

In daily life, seemingly hard steel is very easy to break due to the brittleness of the material due to factors such as low temperature environment, material defects, and stress concentration. The same is true for the cognitive system. Cognitive gaps refer to the cracks, pain points, weaknesses, and sensitive points in the cognitive thinking of the target object, which are mainly manifested as the individual’s worry that he is unable to cope with or adapt to the environment, and under the influence of anxiety, cognitive vulnerability is formed. The experience of security threats, the looseness of group structure, the confusion of beliefs and ideals, and the loss of voice of authoritative media will all cause cognitive conflicts and tearing of the target object. In cognitive domain operations, sometimes seemingly powerful combat opponents hide a large number of thinking cracks and psychological weaknesses behind them. Often a news event can shake the cognitive framework of the combat opponent and puncture the cognitive bubble. In addition, this cognitive psychological conflict will also cause moral damage and psychological trauma to individuals. In recent years, the U.S. and Western countries’ troops carrying out overseas missions have faced “enemies disguised as civilians” that appear anytime and anywhere, and their uncertainty about the battlefield environment has continued to increase. They generally lack the perception of the significance of combat, and are filled with guilt and sin. A large number of soldiers developed post-traumatic stress disorder, the number of self-harm on the battlefield, post-war suicides and crimes increased sharply, and the number of suicides among veterans of the war even exceeded the number of deaths on the battlefield.

(Author’s unit: Political Science Academy of National Defense University)

國語中文:

引言

認知域作戰標靶是指認知域作戰的具體作用指向。在認知域作戰中,相較於作戰對象,作戰標靶解決的問題是精確瞄準,也就是讓指揮官了解掌握具體打什麼、往哪裡打、打到什麼程度的精準座標問題。只有深刻理解認知域作戰標靶的內涵特點,才能透過表象準確找到關鍵標靶,以便在未來作戰中掌握先機。

影響行為選擇的認知重心

認知重心是戰爭活動中認知主體多元思維認知的“匯聚點”,作為一種能動因素影響認知進程和行為結果。一般而言,影響戰爭活動中個人行為選擇的認知因素,主要包含政治屬性認知、利益關聯認知、群體歸屬認知、風險損失認知、情緒定向認知、戰爭道德認知等。對於戰爭活動以及關注戰爭活動的群體或個體而言,影響其態度、傾向和行為的認知重心並不相同。從近年來的世界局部戰爭和地區衝突來看,不同群體或個體關注的認知重心有著明顯差異,政治人物更加關注政治屬性認知和利益關聯認知,戰爭可能介入者更關注風險損耗認知和利益關聯認知,一般民眾更關注利益關聯認知和情感定向認知,而域外他國民眾由於自身利益不會受到直接損失,普遍更關注戰爭道德認知和群體歸屬認知。外軍在作戰實踐中,善於針對不同對象的認知重心,精準策劃主題,推送關聯訊息,誘發特定的行為選擇。如同在海灣戰爭前,希爾·諾頓公關公司炮製了根本不存在的“育嬰箱事件”,就是利用科威特駐美大使的女兒娜伊拉“做證”,展現伊拉克軍隊的“慘無人道”,誘發美國民眾的倫理道德認知,進而支持美國政府派兵參加海灣戰爭。

制約指揮決策的風格偏好

認知風格直接影響決策行為偏好。認知風格是指個體認知、記憶、思考、解決問題的典型方式。根據指揮決策風格偏好,指揮家可以分為冷靜型認知風格和衝動型認知風格。冷靜型認知風格的指揮者在決策過程中重視準確但不重視速度,作出的決策品質較高,但容易陷入對各類情報資訊來源的比對分析,過度強調資訊分析的準確客觀。冷靜型認知風格的指揮在戰場認知攻防行動中,常常容易受到紛繁多元的信息刺激幹擾,心智精力容易被擾亂和耗散,進而可能貽誤戰機。衝動型認知風格的指揮者重視速度但不重視準確度,作出的決策反應速度較快,但品質不高,且容易情緒激動,易與團隊成員發生衝突。衝動型認知風格的指揮者也容易將模稜兩可的外在安全環境進行過度曲解,並不斷尋找「證據」強化和驗證個體錯誤思維,使個體注意力變窄,導致出現指揮決策偏差。外軍在作戰實務中,比較著重分析作戰對手指揮官決策風格,進而選擇特定資訊對其進行心理影響。如美軍入侵巴拿馬戰爭中,在圍攻巴拿馬總統諾列加躲藏處時,美軍反複播放搖滾和重金屬音樂,運用刺激和羞辱諾列加的語言對其進行認知打擊和心理進攻,使諾列加身心逐漸崩潰。

控制思維認知的後門通道

電腦一旦中了「木馬」病毒,會在特定時間向駭客控制端發送連線請求,一旦連線成功就會形成後門通道,使得駭客可以隨心所欲地控制電腦。與之相似,人類大腦也存在認知“後門”,也可能被他人控制。認知心理學家研究發現,透過給目標對象視聽感知通道發送訊息,精心推送目標對象認可的、接受的信息內容,迎合目標對像已有的經驗記憶,順應目標對象思維習慣,刺激目標對象的情感痛點,就可以控制干擾目標物認知,促進其產生本能情緒行為反應。在尖端認知科學技術的支撐下,運用大腦資訊加工的自動啟動和控制加工兩種模式,目標物很容易陷入「認知繭房」之中。認知域作戰中,透過讓個體沉浸在人為構設的海量資訊之中,並源源不斷地為其提供「證據」用來佐證其判斷和認知是「正確」的。長此以往,個體的認知視野就變得越來越小,對外在環境的感知能力逐漸降低,最終會看不到事情的真相,沉湎於「認知繭房」中無法自拔。外軍在認知域作戰中,常常針對作戰對手對某一問題的認知偏差,持續透過多種管道推送佐證作戰對手自以為「正確認知」的態勢訊息和情報訊息,使作戰對手指揮決策出現失誤和偏差。

誘發關注的感知覺刺激

有效的知覺刺激是引發目標對象關注的首要前提。人類大腦對感知覺範圍內的刺激會有所察覺,並做出各種反應。認知心理學實驗研究發現,動態、危險、利害關係人、生存安全、前後反差等類別資訊更容易引起人類大腦的注意。在智慧化時代,目標對象的心理認知過程往往遵循「引起注意、培養興趣、主動搜尋、強化記憶、主動分享、影響他人」的規律。外軍在作戰中,常運用獨家爆料、情報外洩、權威揭露、現場連線等方式,巧用誇張、對比、聯想、比喻、懸念、襯託等手法,推播顛覆常識、認知衝突、對比強烈等訊息,來引發目標對象注意。例如伊拉克戰爭中美軍塑造的“營救女兵林奇事件”,利比亞戰爭中的“卡扎菲黃金馬桶”,大多選擇受眾對象熟知的故事為藍本,藏目的、寓觀點於故事情節,吸引了廣大民眾的注意力。此外,人類大腦也會對感知覺範圍外的刺激進行加工。近年來,西方國家軍隊非常重視知覺閾下資訊刺激技術的研究,開發發展了閾下視覺訊息植入技術、閾下聽覺訊息植入技術、閾下訊息啟動技術、神經系統潛意識聲音操控技術等,不斷擴大神經認知科學技術在軍事領域的應用範圍。

催生認知共振的後設價值概念

認知理論中,認知共振是指跨越雙方認知鴻溝,能夠引發雙方思想心理與認知共鳴共感的訊息,進而實現對對方認知體系的解構與重建。在認知域作戰中,這種認知聚能效應不是簡單意義上的力量集中,而是體系合力的內在累積。在現代資訊傳媒的擴散傳播作用下,這種認知共振效應能在短時間內迅速擴散到全球各地,並產生二次間接心理效應或更多層次的衍生心理效應,呈現出一種累積迭代的狀態,一旦超過心理臨界點,即呈現出心理能量爆發狀態,從而改變事件走向或結果。能夠誘發這種認知共振的靶標,主要有價值信念、道德倫理、共通利益等。戰爭中,若某一方觸及或違反人類元價值觀、共同情感指向等,則極易誘發集體聲討,承擔違背人類道德的指責,陷於道義低谷。如越戰期間的一張照片,畫面呈現的是遭遇美軍凝固汽油彈襲擊後,一群越南孩子特別是一名9歲女孩在公路上因為燒傷而裸體奔跑。 1972年,這張照片刊登後引發巨大轟動,掀起美國乃至全球的反戰浪潮,加速了越戰的結束。

分裂認知體系的認知縫隙

日常生活中,看似堅硬的鋼鐵,受低溫環境、材質缺陷、應力集中等因素影響,非常容易因材料脆性而斷裂,認知體係也是如此。認知縫隙是指目標對象認知思考中的裂縫、痛點、弱點與敏感點,主要表現為個體擔心自己沒有能力應對或無法適應環境的想法,並在焦慮情緒的作用下,構成認知脆弱性。安全威脅的經驗、團體結構的鬆散、信念理想的迷惘、權威媒介的失聲等,都會使得目標物出現認知上的衝突與撕裂。認知域作戰中,有時看似強大的作戰對手,背後卻潛藏著大量的思維裂隙與心理弱點,往往一個新聞事件就能動搖作戰對手的認知框架,刺破認知泡沫。此外,這種認知心理衝突也會使個體產生道德損傷和心理創傷。近年來,執行海外任務的美西方國家軍隊面對隨時隨地出現的“偽裝成平民的敵人”,對戰場環境的不確定感不斷提升,普遍缺乏作戰意義感知,進而內心充滿內疚與罪惡。大量士兵產生戰爭創傷後壓力障礙,戰場自殘自傷、戰後自殺與犯罪人數激增,參戰老兵自殺人數甚至超過戰場死亡人數。

(作者單位:國防大學政治學院)唐國東

中國軍網 國防部網 // 2023年3月23日 星期四

中國原創軍事資源:https://www.81.cn/jfjbmap/content/2023-03/23/content_336888.htm

China’s Emphasis on Accelerating the Advancement of Military Intelligence

中國重視加速軍事情報進步

現代英語:

Today, the world’s science and technology is brewing new breakthroughs. With the man-machine war as a symbol, the development of artificial intelligence has made significant progress and is accelerating its development into the military field, which will inevitably have an impact on the war situation and even a subversive impact. Therefore, our military must accelerate the promotion of military intelligence construction and accelerate the forging of an intelligent army.

Create intelligent theory. Create the basic theory of intelligent warfare, and conduct in-depth research on the concept connotation, essential characteristics, war guidance, combat style, offensive and defensive actions, winning mechanism, characteristic laws, etc. of intelligent warfare; continuously innovate the tactics of intelligent warfare, such as intelligent cluster warfare, precise second-kill warfare, cognitive control warfare, intelligent ambush warfare, etc.; study and master the basic technical theories of intelligent warfare, including the perception and understanding of highly complex battlefield environments, human-machine hybrid intelligence in human-machine collaborative operations, etc. These theories are the cornerstone of the intelligent warfare theory system. In the future, the war theory with “algorithm-centric warfare” as the core is very likely to replace the war theory with “network-centric warfare” as the core.

Reshape the intelligent form. Military organization is the link between military technology and combat theory, and is the lever for exerting the overall combat effectiveness of the army. In the future intelligent warfare, along with the pace of new military reforms, the development trend of military organization will be built and developed in the direction of “globally distributed, networked matrix” leadership and management system, “algorithm-supported, human-machine integration” combat command system, “small and flexible, modular cluster” scale structure, and “military integration, military and civilian integration, traditional forces as the main body, intelligent forces as the backbone, unmanned and adaptive” force composition. The organizational structure of future intelligent warfare will be to form small, multi-functional, intelligent, new joint combat forces of different types and purposes according to different levels of strategy, campaign, and tactics and different military services.

Develop intelligent weapons. We should focus on the dual needs of intelligent warfare system operations and intelligent weapons and equipment system construction, do a good job in top-level design and overall coordination, compile a roadmap for the development of intelligent weapons and equipment systems, and develop intelligent unmanned combat equipment systems that match operations and support, covering land, sea, air, space, and network space domains, in a planned, focused, and step-by-step manner, and with high, medium, and low-end, large, medium, and small, long, medium, and short ranges, and enhance the system integration of various services and various intelligent weapons and equipment such as operations and support. At the same time, we should focus on the needs of unmanned and anti-unmanned, intelligent and anti-intelligent operations, and focus on the research and development of weapons and equipment systems for anti-enemy intelligent unmanned operations to ensure that we can effectively conduct intelligent unmanned offensive and defensive confrontations with the enemy.

Innovate intelligent training. At present, the concept and method of intelligent combat are constantly updated, and the training mode has changed from “mechanical + information” dominated to “intelligent +” dominated. Artificial intelligence technology can create a more “real” weapon operation experience and battlefield environment, can realistically simulate the combat process, assist decision-making and command, and evaluate combat concepts. Exploring new models of intelligent training and improving intelligent combat capabilities will become an important part of future military training and preparation. In particular, intelligent warfare and unmanned combat should be included in the training outline and carried out on a regular basis.

Cultivate intelligent talents. Talent is the first resource. The cultivation of artificial intelligence talents is the foundation for strengthening the country’s intelligent infrastructure. Intelligent warfare has the characteristics of complexity, advancement, and humanization. It has the characteristics of decentralized combat command, de-division of combat processes, de-stratification of talent structure, high-end skill operation, research-based working methods, and fuzzification of the front and rear. Correspondingly, it also requires intelligent military talents to have the characteristics of talent group, advanced skills, complex knowledge, innovative thinking, and intelligent decision-making. Therefore, to build an intelligent army and win intelligent warfare, it is first necessary to have a large number of specialized technical talents and command talents in the field of artificial intelligence.

Deepen intelligent integration. Breakthroughs in the core key technologies of artificial intelligence are the “national heavy weapon” to deal with the threats and challenges of intelligent warfare. In the tide of the intelligent era, we must focus on achieving integrated breakthroughs in the following disruptive technologies: around algorithm support, develop intelligent data mining technology for massive intelligence information and intelligent planning technology; around machine combat, develop intelligent chip technology and autonomous unmanned system technology; around intelligent decision-making, develop explainable high-reliability auxiliary decision-making technology, human-computer interaction and intelligent fusion technology; around extreme combat, develop intelligent cluster combat coordination technology and energy and information intelligent confrontation technology. Therefore, the research and development of core key technologies of military intelligence should not only carry out cross-disciplinary and cross-domain collaborative innovation, but also connect the development of social intelligence with that of military intelligence, draw on the mature technologies and successful experiences of social intelligence development, vigorously strengthen the in-depth development of military-civilian integration, and promote the rapid embedding of various artificial intelligence technologies into combat elements and processes.

國語中文:

當今世界科技正醞釀著新的突破,以人機大戰為標志,人工智慧發展取得重大進展,並加速向軍事領域發展,這必將對戰爭形態產生沖擊甚至顛覆性影響。因此,我軍必須加速推進軍事智慧化建設,加速鍛造智慧化軍隊。

創建智能化理論。創造智慧化戰爭基礎理論,深入研究智能化戰爭的概念內涵、本質特徵、戰爭指導、作戰樣式、攻防行動、制勝機理、特點規律等內容;不斷創新智能化戰爭的戰法,如智能集群戰、精確秒殺戰、認知控制戰、智能伏擊戰等;研究掌握智能化戰爭的技術基礎理論,包括高復雜戰場環境的感知與理解、人機協同作戰的人機混合智能等。這些理論是智慧化戰爭理論體系的基石。未來以「演算法中心戰」為核心的戰爭理論,極有可能取代以「網絡中心戰」為核心的戰爭理論。

重塑智能化形態。軍隊組織是聯結軍事技術和作戰理論的紐帶,也是發揮軍隊整體作戰效能的槓桿。在未來智慧化戰爭中,伴隨著新軍事變革的步伐,軍隊組織的發展趨勢,將按照領導管理體制「全局分散式、網絡矩陣式」、作戰指揮體制「演算法支撐、人機融合」、規模結構「小型靈巧、模塊集群」、力量編成「軍種融合軍民一體、傳統部隊為主體、智慧部隊為骨幹的無人化、自適應」方向建設發展。未來智慧化戰爭的體制編制將依戰略、戰役、戰術不同層次和不同軍兵種,組建不同類型、不同用途的小型多能智能化新型聯合作戰部隊。

發展智能化武器。應著眼於智慧化戰爭體係作戰和智慧化武器裝備體系建設的雙重需要,搞好頂層設計和整體統籌,編制智能化武器裝備體系發展路線圖,按計劃、有重點、分步驟地研製高中低端、大中小型、遠中近程,覆蓋陸、海、空、天和網絡等空間領域,作戰與保障相配套的智能化無人作戰裝備體系,增強各軍兵種和作戰、保障等各種智能化武器裝備的體系融合度。與此同時,應著眼無人和反無人、智能與反智能作戰需要,注重研發反敵智能化無人作戰的武器裝備系統,確保能夠有效地與敵進行智能化無人攻防對抗。

創新智能化訓練。當前,智慧化作戰理念、作戰方式不斷更新,訓練模式由「機械+資訊」主導型向「智慧+」主導型轉變。人工智慧技術能夠創造出更「真實」的武器操作體驗和戰場環境,能夠逼真地演繹作戰進程、輔助決策指揮、評估作戰構想。探索智慧化訓練新模式,提升智慧化作戰能力,將成為未來練兵備戰的重要內容。特別是將智慧化戰爭和無人化作戰納入訓練大綱,常態化展開進行。

培養智能化人才。人才是第一資源。人工智慧人才的培養是加強國家智慧化基礎建設的根本。智慧化戰爭具有複雜性、超前性、類人化等特徵,存在作戰指揮去中心化、作戰過程去分工化、人才結構去分層化、技能操作高端化、工作方式研究化、前沿與後方模糊化等特點,相應也要求智慧化軍事人才具有人才群體性、技能精尖性、知識復合性、思維創新性、決策智能性等特點。因此,建設智慧化軍隊,打贏智慧化戰爭,首要是擁有一大批人工智慧領域的專門技術人才和指揮人才。

深化智能化融合。人工智慧核心關鍵技術的突破,是應對智慧化戰爭威脅和挑戰的「國之重器」。在智慧時代的浪潮中,要重點在以下顛覆性技術上取得融合突破:圍繞演算法支撐發展海量情報資訊智慧數據挖掘技術、智慧規劃技術;圍繞機器主戰發展智慧晶片技術、自主無人系統技術;圍繞智慧決策發展可解釋高可信賴輔助決策技術、人機互動與智慧融合技術;圍繞極限作戰發展智慧集群作戰協同技術、能量與資訊智慧對抗技術。因此,軍事智慧化核心關鍵技術的研發,不僅要開展跨學科、跨領域協作創新,還要使社會智能化與軍事智能化發展對接並軌,借鑒社會智能化發展的成熟技術和成功經驗,大力加強軍民融合深度發展,推動各類人工智慧技術快速嵌入作戰要素、作戰流程。

來源:解放軍報 作者:李明海 責任編輯:喬楠楠 2019-10-08 10:39:28

中國軍事資源:http://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/jmsd/4852388.html

China’s Military Metaverse: A New Frontier for Future Cognitive Warfare

中國軍事元宇宙:未來認知戰爭的新領域

現代英語:

 ●The essence of the metaverse is a highly developed virtual world that exists in parallel with the real world but also reacts to the real world.

  ●Parallel with the real world, reaction to the real world, and integration of multiple high technologies are the three major characteristics of the future metaverse.

  ●The metaverse provides a new way of thinking to understand and discover the operating behaviors, states and laws of complex real systems, as well as a new means to explore objective laws and transform nature and society.

  ● Strengthening the follow-up research on the role of the metaverse in cognitive warfare and highlighting the exploration of the mechanism of the role of the metaverse in cognitive warfare will help enrich and promote the construction of cognitive warfare theory.

  The essence of the metaverse is a highly developed virtual world that exists in parallel with the real world but reacts to the real world. When virtual technologies such as digital, Internet, augmented reality and modern communications, blockchain, artificial intelligence and other technologies develop to a certain stage, the metaverse will emerge. Being parallel to the real world, reacting to the real world, and integrating multiple high technologies are the three major characteristics of the future metaverse. The operation of the metaverse conforms to the natural law of human understanding and transformation of the world. It directly acts on human thinking and cognition but is not bound by the essential attributes of thinking and cognition, which determines that it carries the operating laws of the real world, provides a new way of thinking to understand and discover the operating behavior, state and laws of complex systems in reality, and a new means to explore objective laws and transform nature and society. At the same time, it is itself a complex cognitive body, so it has immeasurable cognitive warfare application value.

  The basic mechanism of cognitive warfare in the metaverse

  The difference between the metaverse and other technologies is that it builds a complete digital world. Its operation is not supported by a single or a few technologies, but by a complex high-tech complex. This complex is built by humans, is a product of cognition, and continues to develop and evolve with the development of human cognitive practice. Its cognitive application has a unique regular mechanism.

  System enhancement mechanism. The digital world constructed by the metaverse is itself a highly developed cognitive world. In this special cognitive world, technology not only exists as an additional role such as support and guarantee, but also directly participates in the shaping of cognition itself as a basic element of cognition. In other words, the technology that constitutes the metaverse itself has a distinct cognitive background, which not only supports the operation of cognition but also realizes the self-construction, revolution and transcendence of cognition; it not only provides a series of necessary technical services, but also creates a holographic technical soil for human cognition to operate independently and fight independently. The effect of the metaverse on cognition is not one-dimensional, but full-dimensional; not single-line, but full-system; not independent, but immersive; not fragmentary, but continuous; not cyclical, but full-life process. How far the thinking cognition develops, how far the metaverse develops, and thus it can shape people’s thinking cognition more comprehensively, deeply and lastingly. Therefore, humans have used high technology to create a complex system combining man and machine called “Avatar”, and have also created a life form on “Pandora” that can think independently, recognize itself, and think and act on its own. This life form, which was created by humans and is independent of humans, has achieved self-improvement and development in the new universe.

  The mechanism of mutual construction of technology and knowledge. Unlike the one-way effect of individual technologies such as artificial intelligence and information networks on thinking and cognition, the metaverse provides a space for mutual construction of technology and cognition, and the effect and counter-effect. In this space, we can simulate, demonstrate, simulate, and verify the process and results of this two-way mutual construction and promotion, so as to understand cognition more accurately and efficiently, improve cognitive warfare methods, and directly engage in real cognitive confrontation. The metaverse provides a parallel cognitive space that digitally twins real combat scenes, where cognitive warfare can be promoted efficiently, enhanced at a fast pace, and presented in a panoramic manner. It is reported that the US military uses virtual technology to verify the performance of new weapons and equipment, test the effectiveness of the use of new tactics, and conduct combat simulation training, relying on the deployment of troops, combat terrain, human characteristics, and other scenes similar to actual combat constructed in virtual spaces such as the metaverse. At the same time, more and more countries and armies are conducting direct cognitive attacks and defenses with their opponents through virtual spaces, confusing their minds, misleading their directions, and eroding their will.

  Active reflection mechanism. As a virtual existence parallel to the real world, the metaverse is not a simple digital copy of the three-dimensional space, but has its own operating rules and can actively act on the real world. This active action is the focus of the cognitive application of the metaverse. The metaverse space game reflects the characteristics of cognitive warfare. The war results deduced in the metaverse through virtual simulation may directly affect the real world, extending to the conscious cognitive game through sensory touch, thereby winning the dominant position in cognitive warfare. In the cognitive perspective, the metaverse is both a new cognitive space and the main battlefield of cognition, as well as an extended domain of cognition and a new cognitive component. At present, the military of many countries uses sandbox operations, war games and even computer simulations to formulate and test strategies and tactics, revise the application of tactics, improve training methods, and improve weapons and equipment. This is a typical example of the virtual world reacting to reality. With the continuous development and integration of the metaverse technology group, cognitive confrontation will inevitably shift more and faster from the real world to a hybrid world combining virtuality and reality.

  The basic characteristics of cognitive warfare in the metaverse

  Existence determines consciousness, and technology drives creation. The metaverse has many characteristics, such as parallelism with the real world, initiative in the real world, and comprehensiveness that integrates multiple technologies. These prominent characteristics determine the different characteristics and laws of its effects on thinking and cognition.

  Cross-domain construction. The formation, development and evolution of cognition are rarely determined by a single factor, but are often the result of the combined effect of multiple factors. The metaverse originates from the real world and is presented in the virtual space. It has the characteristics of multi-domain interconnection that runs through the real and virtual worlds. As the saying goes, “a lot of gossip can melt gold, and accumulated criticism can destroy bones.” This cross-domain characteristic that spans different fields and opens up related spaces can best influence and shape people’s thinking and cognition from different angles. The most typical case is that game developers are increasingly focusing on using virtual stories based on historical facts and real feelings to attract and infect people. The United States has used this cross-domain shaped surreal “real” experience to spread values. At present, the most representative “metaverse” themed science fiction work is “Ready Player One” directed by Spielberg. The play focuses on depicting the era background of the birth of the “metaverse” and the huge contrast between the real status and virtual status of the protagonist. Through the plot and special effects shots, it delicately portrays the real sense of human participation, thereby spreading the American ideology, especially the values, that wealth, status, love and friendship can be obtained through “bloodless” struggle in the virtual world.

  Integrated influence. The important fulcrums of cognitive warfare are strategy and technology. With the development of science and technology and the progress of society, the proportion of technology in cognitive warfare is increasing and its role is becoming more and more prominent. It can be said that cognitive warfare without scientific and technological support is a cognitive warfare without power, and cognitive warfare with advanced technology is more likely to win. As a complex system integrating multiple cutting-edge technologies, the metaverse has a natural advantage in the use of cognitive warfare. Many people, including adults, are deeply trapped in the virtual world and indulge in online games. It is very important that the virtual space gives game operators a super-time and space experience and a sense of achievement. If martial arts novels are fairy tales for adults, then the metaverse, which can be “as one pleases”, creates a super fairy tale world, which has an immeasurable impact on people’s thinking, cognition, value pursuit, moral concepts, emotional will, and behavior patterns.

  Compromising influence. A big difference between the metaverse and other technical means is that it constructs a virtual world that originates from the real world but reacts to the real world. In this complex domain space, people’s thinking and cognition go back and forth between the real world and the virtual space, verify each other, repeatedly confirm, and constantly correct, thereby generating new thinking and cognition, and exerting a dynamic influence on both worlds. This two-way interactive compromising influence, on the one hand, is conducive to the formation and development of correct thinking and cognition, making the cognition of the real world more imaginative with the wings of the virtual world’s thoughts, and at the same time, it also makes the cognition of the virtual space find the material support of the real world and become more scientific. On the other hand, if it is not operated properly, it is likely to cause great safety hazards and ethical problems. In recent years, the U.S. military has relied on artificial intelligence and virtual technology to remotely control drones to attack opponents, which is a typical example of the virtual world reacting to the real world. This attack is far away from the tragic scene of face-to-face fighting, which greatly dilutes the drone operator’s awe of life and lowers the threshold for remotely controlling the opponent. At the same time, due to the imperfect reconnaissance and identification technology, incidents of accidental shooting, injury, and killing of civilians, friendly forces, and even their own troops often occur.

  The basic style of cognitive warfare in the metaverse

  Metaverse cognitive warfare is based on reality and leads future development. It involves both the virtual and real worlds, penetrates multiple fields, and covers a variety of technologies. There are many different combat styles, and there is great uncertainty, but there are rules to follow. Comprehensive analysis shows that there are three basic styles.

  Platform confrontation. In terms of its relationship with human thinking and cognition, the metaverse itself is a complex cognitive actor, a derivative of human thinking and cognition, and an important component and platform of cognitive warfare. When hostile countries and armies regard the metaverse as an important position for cognitive warfare, cognitive offensive and defensive operations between different camps within the metaverse exist in reality. On this platform, all technologies, resources and forces of the metaverse are integrated and operated with thinking and cognition as the center. Metaverse operations are prominently manifested as cognitive offensive and defensive operations aimed at disrupting, delaying, blocking, destroying and eliminating the existence and operation of the opponent’s metaverse. In this field, whoever has higher-end strategic planning, more flexible tactical application, more advanced technical force and more solid material support will be able to gain the initiative in metaverse cognitive warfare.

  System attack. The metaverse is a cognitive system composed of a series of cutting-edge technologies, and systemicity is its inherent attribute and vitality guarantee. Advanced technologies such as digital foundation, efficient communication, blockchain identity authentication, holographic AR imaging, artificial intelligence, and high-performance Internet constitute a unified body with tight structure, functional coupling, and complete system. The components are indispensable for the formation and development of thinking cognition and offensive and defensive confrontation. It is difficult to imagine that the metaverse still has the possibility of existence without the support of advanced technology groups such as high-level digitization, high-quality communication, and high-speed computing. Using superior forces to force or use asymmetric tactics to attack and block the key nodes and technological operation chains of the opponent’s metaverse system, hinder its operation, suppress its functions, and destroy its existence is an important style and efficient path of metaverse cognitive warfare.

  Divert the flow. An important value and significance of the existence and development of the metaverse lies in serving and supporting the related activities of the real world. Under normal circumstances, the metaverse can demonstrate, display, review and predict the related activities of the real world in a digital form. Once the communication between the virtual and real worlds is disturbed or the self-operation of the metaverse is disordered, it is easy to cause the situation reflected to be untrue, the information analyzed to be distorted, the conclusions derived to be invalid, and the suggestions provided to be wrong, causing the related activities of the real world to deviate. It is based on this that we can concentrate our efforts on inducing attacks on the internal operation of the opponent’s metaverse or the communication technology devices of the two worlds, and use extremely confusing and deceptive information and scenes to divert the flow, confuse their cognition, interfere with their judgment, and mislead their decision-making. Therefore, we should strengthen the tracking research on the cognitive warfare of the role of the metaverse, highlight the exploration of the cognitive warfare mechanism of the role of the metaverse, and strengthen and promote the construction of cognitive warfare theory.

  (Author’s unit: Military Political Work Research Institute of the Academy of Military Sciences)

國語中文:

●元宇宙本質是與現實世界平行存在但又反作用於現實世界的高度發展的虛擬世界。

●與現實世界平行、反作用於現實世界、多種高技術綜合,是未來元宇宙的三大特徵。

●元宇宙提供了理解和發現現實複雜系統運作行為、狀態和規律的全新思維方式,以及探知客觀規律、改造自然和社會的新手段。

●加強元宇宙作用認知戰追蹤研究,突顯元宇宙作用認知戰機理探索,將有助於豐富及促進認知戰理論建構。

元宇宙本質是與現實世界平行存在但又反作用於現實世界的高度發達的虛擬世界。當數位、網路、擴增實境等虛擬技術和現代通訊、區塊鏈、人工智慧等技術發展到一定階段,元宇宙就橫空出世。與現實世界平行、反作用於現實世界、多種高技術綜合,是未來元宇宙的三大特徵。元宇宙運作符合人類認識世界、改造世界的自然規律,其直接作用於人的思維認知但又不拘泥於思維認知的本質屬性,決定其本身承載了現實世界的運作規律,提供了理解和發現現實複雜系統運作行為、狀態和規律的全新思維方式和探知客觀規律、改造自然和社會的新手段,同時它本身就是一個複雜的認知體,因而具有不可估量的認知戰應用價值。

元宇宙作用認知戰的基本機理

元宇宙相對於其他技術的不同在於構築了一個完整的數位世界,支撐其運作的不是單一或幾個技術,而是一個複雜的高科技複合體。這個複合體是人構築的,是認知的產物並隨人類認知實踐的發展不斷發展演變,其認知運用具有獨特的規律機制。

體系增強機制。元宇宙構築的數位世界本身就是一個高度發展的認知世界,在這個特殊的認知世界裡,科技不僅以支撐和保障等附加角色存在,也直接作為認知的基本元素參與認知本身的塑造。也就是說構成元宇宙的技術本身俱有鮮明的認知底色,既支撐了認知的運作又實現了認知的自我建構、革命與超越;既提供了一系列必要的技術服務,又打造了一個人類認知自我運作、獨立作戰的全息技術土壤。元宇宙對認知的作用不是單向度的,而是全維度的;不是單線的,而是全系統的;不是獨立式的,而是沉浸型的;不是片段的,而是持續型的;不是周期階段型的,而是全壽命流程的。思維認知發展有多遠,元宇宙發展就有多遠,因而能夠更全面更深入、更持久地塑造人的思維認知。於是,人類既用高科技打造了「阿凡達」這個人機結合的複雜系統,同時也打造了一個在「潘朵拉星球」上能夠自主思維、自我認知、自行思想與行動的生命體,這個產生於人又獨立於人的生命體在新的宇宙空間中實現了自我完善與發展。

技知互構機理。與人工智慧、資訊網路等單一技術對思考認知的單向作用不同,元宇宙提供了一個技術與認知作用與反作用、影響與反影響的互構空間。在這個空間裡,我們能夠模擬、展示、模擬、驗證這種雙向互構共促的過程與結果,進而更加精準高效地認識認知、改進認知戰方式,同時也可以直接進行真刀真槍的認知對抗。元宇宙提供了一個將現實作戰場景數位孿生的平行認知空間,在這裡認知戰得以高效率推進、快節奏增強、全景式呈現。據悉,美軍將虛擬技術運用於新武器裝備性能驗證、新戰法運用效果檢驗及作戰模擬訓練等,依託的就是在元宇宙等虛擬空間中構建的兵力佈置、作戰地形、人文特徵等近似實戰的場景。同時,也有越來越多的國家和軍隊透過虛擬空間與對手進行直接的認知攻防,迷茫其心智,誤導其方向,銷蝕其意志。

能動反射機理。元宇宙作為與現實世界平行的虛擬存在,不是簡單地將三維空間數位化複製,而有著自身運行規則並能動作用於現實世界,這種能動作用即是元宇宙認知運用的著力點。元宇宙空間博弈體現認知戰特點,透過虛擬模擬在元宇宙中推演出的戰爭結果,可能直接作用於現實世界,透過感官觸覺延伸到意識認知的爭奪博弈,從而贏得認知戰主導權。在認知視域下,元宇宙既是認知的新空間也是認知的主戰場,既是認知的延伸域也是認知的新構件。目前,不少國家軍隊透過沙盤作業、兵棋推演甚至電腦模擬模擬來發展和檢驗戰略戰術、修訂戰法運用、完善訓練方法、改進武器裝備,就是虛擬世界反作用於現實的典型案例。隨著元宇宙技術群不斷發展融合,認知對抗必將更多、更快由現實世界向虛實結合的混合世界發展轉進。

元宇宙作用認知戰的基本特徵

存在決定意識,技術驅動創造。元宇宙具有與現實世界的平行性、對現實世界的能動性、融多種技術於一體的綜合性等諸多特徵。這些突出特徵,決定其作用於思考認知的不同特徵規律。

跨領域構塑。認知的形成發展演變很少由單一因素決定,往往是多種因素綜合作用的結果。元宇宙源自現實世界、呈現於虛擬空間,具有貫穿現實與虛擬的多域連結特徵。所謂“眾口鑠金,積毀銷骨”,這種跨越不同領域、打通關聯空間的跨域特質,最能從不同角度影響和塑造人的思維認知。最典型的案例就是遊戲開發商越來越注重用建立在歷史事實和現實感受基礎上的虛擬故事吸引人感染人。美國已將這種跨領域塑造的超現實「真實」體驗用於價值觀的傳播。目前最具代表性的「元宇宙」主題科幻作品是史匹柏導演的《頭號玩家》,該劇聚焦於描繪「元宇宙」誕生的時代背景及主角的現實地位與虛擬地位之間的巨大反差,透過故事情節和特效鏡頭細膩地刻畫人類的真實參與感,從而傳播在虛擬世界裡透過「不流血」的鬥爭也能獲得財富、地位、愛情和友誼的美式意識形態特別是價值觀。

融合式影響。認知戰運作依託的重要支點是謀略和技術,隨著科技的發展和社會的進步,技術之於認知戰構成所佔比重越來越大、作用越來越突出。可以說,缺乏科技支撐的認知戰是缺乏力量的認知戰,有先進科技加持的認知戰獲勝的可能性更大。元宇宙作為融多種前沿科技於一體的複雜系統,在認知戰運用上具有天然優勢。不少人包括成年人深陷虛擬世界、沉湎網路遊戲,很重要的是虛擬空間賦予遊戲操盤手的超時空體驗和成就快感。如果說武俠小說是成人的童話,那麼可以「隨心所欲」縱橫馳騁的元宇宙,則打造了一個超級童話世界,其對人的思維認知、價值追求、道德觀念、情感意志、行為模式等的影響不可限量。

折衝性浸染。元宇宙與其他技術手段的一個很大不同,在於其建構的是一個源自現實世界但又反作用於現實世界母體的虛擬世界。在這個複雜領域空間中,人的思維認知在現實世界與虛擬空間之間往來折衝、相互印證、反覆確認、不斷修正進而產生新的思考認知,並對兩個世界都產生施動性影響。這種雙向互動的折衝性浸染,一方面有利於正確思維認知的形成與發展,使現實世界的認知插上虛擬世界思想放飛的翅膀而更富想像力,同時也使虛擬空間的認知找到現實世界的物質支撐而更科學。另一方面如果操作不當,很可能產生極大的安全隱患和倫理問題。這些年美軍依賴人工智慧和虛擬技術遙控的無人機攻擊對手,就是虛擬世界反作用於現實世界的典型案例。這種攻擊因遠離面對面搏殺的慘烈現場,極大淡化了無人機操作員對生命的敬畏,降低了其遙控攻擊對手的門檻。同時,由於偵察辨識技術不完善,誤擊誤傷誤殺平民、友軍甚至自己軍隊的事時有發生。

元宇宙作用認知戰的基本樣式

元宇宙作用認知戰基於現實基礎、引領未來發展,涉及虛實兩界、貫通多個領域、涵蓋多種技術,作戰樣式多種多樣,有很大的不確定性,但並非無規律可循。綜合分析,基本樣式有以下三種。

平台對抗。元宇宙就其與人的思維認知的關係而言,本身就是一個複雜的認知行為體,是人類思維認知的衍生品,也是認知戰的重要構件和平台。當敵對國家和軍隊都將元宇宙視為認知戰的重要陣地時,元宇宙內部不同陣營間的認知攻防作戰就會現​​實存在。在這個平台上,元宇宙的一切技術、資源和力量都以思維認知為中心來整合運作。元宇宙作戰突顯為以擾亂、遲滯、阻擋、摧毀、消滅對手元宇宙存在和運作為目的的認知攻防作戰。在這個領域中,誰的戰略運籌更高端、戰術運用更靈活、技術力量更先進、物質支撐更堅實,誰就能取得元宇宙認知戰主動權。

體系破襲。元宇宙是由一系列前沿技術所構成的認知系統,而體系性則是其固有屬性和活力保證。數位基礎、高效通訊、區塊鏈身分認證、全像AR成像、人工智慧、高效能互聯網等先進科技,構成結構緊密、功能耦合、體系完整的統一體,其中構件對思維認知的形成發展與攻防對抗缺一不可。很難想像缺乏高階階數位化、高品質通聯、高速度計算等先進技術群的支撐,元宇宙還有存在的可能性。運用優勢力量高壓強製或以非對稱戰法攻擊和阻斷對手元宇宙體系的關鍵節點和科技運行鏈條,阻遏其運作、壓制其功能、摧毀其存在,是元宇宙認知戰的重要樣式和高效路徑。

曲嚮導流。元宇宙存在發展的一個重要價值和意義在於服務支持現實世界關聯活動。正常情況下,元宇宙能夠以數位形式全景展示、展示、複盤和預測現實世界的相關活動。一旦虛實兩個世界的通聯受擾受阻或元宇宙內部自運行失序,很容易導致其反映的情況失實、分析的信息失真、推導的結論失效、提供的建議失策,使現實世界的關聯活動跑偏走向。正是基於此,可集中力量對對手元宇宙內部運作或兩個世界的通聯技術裝置進行誘導攻擊,用極具迷惑性欺騙性的信息和場景曲嚮導流,迷茫其認知,幹擾其判斷,誤導其決策。因此,應加強元宇宙作用認知戰追蹤研究,突顯元宇宙作用認知戰機制探索,強化促進認知戰理論建構。

(作者單位:軍事科學院軍事政治工作研究院)

中國原創軍事資源:https://appapi.81.cn/v5/public/jfjbshare/?itemid=284_416888&type=3

Chinese Military Discussion on Integration of Intelligence into Military Command and Decision-making

中國軍隊關於情報融入軍事指揮決策的探討

中國軍網 國防部網 // 2022年6月30日 星期四

現代英語:

With the widespread use of advanced technologies such as big data, neural networks, and cloud computing, artificial intelligence is driving the transformation of decision-making thinking, models, and methods with unprecedented power. Decisions based on intuition and experience in the era of small data will give way to decisions based on full sample data in the era of intelligence, and the latter will become a new paradigm for winning on the battlefield. Accelerating the integration of artificial intelligence into modern command decision-making and better realizing the complementary advantages of human brain thinking and machine computing can promote the overall improvement of the level of military command decision-making.

Clarify the advantages of intelligent integration

The intelligent nature of future wars will continue to increase, and it is necessary to make the best decision quickly according to the changes in the enemy situation, our situation and battlefield environment. Simple human brain decision-making is no longer able to adapt to the rhythm of modern warfare. It is necessary to actively use artificial intelligence to achieve rapid and efficient military command decision-making through human-machine collaboration and complementarity. Data-driven decision-making focuses on big data resources for data mining and comprehensive analysis, discovers data associations and unknown laws, and assists commanders in making decisions based on this. Autonomous decision-making relies on the big data analysis platform, combines perception, cognition and decision support, and accurately generates and optimizes decision-making plans on the basis of ensuring timeliness. Pre-practice decision-making, by using the decision simulation system, experiments, tests, demonstrates and optimizes the combat plan before the combat decision results are converted into combat actions, and extracts the best action plan. From this point of view, artificial intelligence will become the “all-source analyst” of the battlefield. With its powerful data and algorithm advantages, it will expand the commander’s breadth and depth of cognition of the battlefield, and can achieve more accurate situation perception, more reliable battle situation judgment, and faster command and control.

Focus on integrating quasi-intelligent

Algorithms, computing power and data are both the internal driving force and core support for the development of artificial intelligence, and should be integrated into the key links of the entire command and control process. We should enhance situational awareness and provide an intelligence basis for command decision-making. We should network and connect the perception systems in the multi-dimensional battlefield, use data mining, deep learning and other technologies to process and utilize a large number of heterogeneous data streams obtained from multiple sources, extract useful battlefield intelligence, and grasp the changes in battlefield situation, so as to achieve effective transformation from information advantage to decision-making advantage. We should strengthen cognitive decision-making capabilities and provide important support for command decision-making. We should focus on the objective reality that the battlefield situation is changing rapidly and the weight of the time factor is constantly increasing. Based on data information technology and artificial intelligence technology, we should organically combine new technologies, new tactics and experience decisions, so as to combine qualitative and quantitative analysis, improve the single-loop decision-making speed of our own OODA loop, expand the breadth of parallel decision-making, and seize cognitive initiative by using speed to defeat slowness, so as to form an effect similar to dimensionality reduction strike. We should optimize coordination and control capabilities and provide solid guarantees for command decision-making. We should use big data analysis technology to explore and compare anomalies in enemy data, quickly capture opportunities for enemy confusion, errors, weaknesses, etc., change the past command model of determining the next action based on the results of the action, adjust decisions in advance, dynamically deploy troops, simulate and measure the effects of actions, and coordinate and control troops to launch troop maneuvers.

Avoiding the risks and challenges of integrating intelligence

Artificial intelligence is susceptible to defective data input, and there are problems such as “garbage in, garbage out”. At the same time, the black box nature of artificial intelligence makes it difficult for people to understand why and how the machine makes decisions, and it is difficult to identify whether the data is damaged and produces wrong results. Therefore, we must work hard on the input end of artificial intelligence. Focus on the application scenarios of artificial intelligence, identify false, forged, and low-quality data, deeply explore data relationships, and improve the integrity of information required for decision-making. Remove the false and retain the true, and increase the accuracy of training data. We must work hard on the interactive end of human-machine collaboration. The biggest dilemma of human-machine collaborative decision-making lies in the interaction between people and machines. There is uncertainty in human-machine interaction, and poor information communication may produce unpredictable and inexplicable results. It is necessary to accelerate the development of intelligent human-machine communication models. We must work hard on the operation end of machine inference. The current “machine learning”, “supervised learning” and “reinforcement learning” have been realized, but we should continue to seek breakthroughs, fully absorb various technical means, optimize model design, and improve database construction. We must work hard on the distribution end of human-machine decision-making. The human brain and machines each have their own advantages. We should focus on strengthening artificial intelligence with “human participation”, reasonably define the level, scope and degree of integration of artificial intelligence into command decision-making, intervene in human brain judgment at critical times, and control the overall safety and reliability of human-machine collaboration.

Realize efficient and orderly integration of intelligence

At present, military intelligence, with intelligence as the core, informatization as the basis, and networking as the symbol, is developing rapidly. Major countries in the world are actively exploring the advantages of artificial intelligence, hoping to make faster and better military decisions than their opponents, while creating more decision-making dilemmas for their opponents. We must keep up with the world trend, focus on top-level design, fully understand and give play to the auxiliary support role of intelligent technology in command decision-making, explore the human-machine collaborative decision-making model that conforms to the characteristics of our army, and guide the construction of the command capability system. We must adhere to systematic guidance and optimize the structure to design the human-machine collaborative path. According to the decision-making purpose and capacity requirements of strategic, campaign, and tactical combat command, distinguish between command, control, communication and other task areas, take into account the respective advantages and characteristics of “man and unmanned”, fully demonstrate the adaptability of artificial intelligence in the field of military command decision-making and possible problems, and systematically design the fields, methods and integration degree of artificial intelligence integration. We must adhere to the division of labor principles of human-led, machine-assisted, learning from each other’s strengths and weaknesses, and coordinated cooperation, design our respective exploration boundaries, and realize the transformation from auxiliary decision-making to intelligent decision-making.

國語中文:

週國輝 劉文術 張 鑑

隨著大數據、神經網路、雲端運算等先進技術的廣泛運用,人工智慧正以前所未有的力量推動決策思維、模式和方法的變革。小數據時代基於直覺和經驗的決策將讓位給智慧化時代基於全樣本數據的決策,後者將成為主導戰場制勝的新典範。加速人工智慧融入現代指揮決策,更能實現人腦思維與機器運算的優勢互補,才能推動軍事指揮決策水準的整體提升。

釐清智能化融入的優勢所在

未來戰爭的智慧化屬性將持續增強,時刻需要根據敵情、我情和戰場環境的變化快速做出最優決策。單純的人腦決策已經難以適應現代戰爭節奏,需要積極借助人工智慧,透過人機協同互補,實現軍事指揮決策的快速且高效。資料驅動式決策,著眼於大數據資源進行資料探勘與綜合研析,從中發現資料關聯、未知規律並據此輔助指揮官進行決策。自主決策依託大數據分析平台,感知、認知和決策支援結合,在確保時效性基礎上,精確產生並優選決策方案。預先實踐式決策,透過利用決策模擬系統,在作戰決策結果未轉化為作戰行動之前,先對作戰方案進行實驗、檢驗、論證與最佳化,從中萃取最佳行動方案。由此觀之,人工智慧將成為戰場的“全源分析師”,以其強大的數據和演算法優勢,拓展指揮官對戰場的認知廣度和深度,可以實現更精準的態勢感知、更可信的戰局研判、更迅速的指揮控制。

把準智能化融入的重點指向

演算法、算力以及資料既是人工智慧發展的內在動力,也是核心支撐,應融入指揮控制整個流程的關鍵環節之中。要增強態勢感知能力,為指揮決策提供情報基礎。應網路化連接多維戰場中的感知系統,借助運用資料探勘、深度學習等技術,處理並利用多源獲取的大量異質資料流,提取戰場有用情報,掌握戰場態勢變化,以實現資訊優勢到決策優勢的有效轉化。要強化認知決斷能力,為指揮決策提供重要支撐。應著眼戰場情勢瞬息萬變,時間要素權重不斷上升的客觀實際,基於數據資訊技術與人工智慧技術,有機結合新技術、新戰法與經驗決策等,使定性與定量相結合,提升己方OODA環的單環決策速度,拓展並行決策廣度,透過以快製慢,奪取認知先手,以形成近似降維打擊的效果。要優化協調控制能力,為指揮決策提供堅實保障。應藉助大數據分析技術,挖掘比對敵情資料中的異常現象,迅速捕捉敵混亂、錯誤、弱點等戰機,改變過去根據行動結果確定下一步行動的指揮模式,預先調整決策,動態調配兵力,模擬、計算行動效果,協調控制部隊展開兵力機動。

規避智慧化融入的風險挑戰

人工智慧易受缺陷資料輸入的影響,存在「垃圾進、垃圾出」等問題。同時,人工智慧的黑盒子性質,使人很難理解機器為何以及如何做出決策,難以辨識數據是否因受到損害並產生錯誤結果的情況。因此,要在人工智慧的輸入端下功夫。著眼於人工智慧應用場景,辨識虛假、偽造、劣質數據,深度挖掘數據關係,提升決策所需資訊的完整性。去偽存真,增加訓練資料的準確性。要在人機協同的互動端下功夫。人機協同決策的最大困境在於人與機器之間的交互,人機互動存在不確定性,訊息溝通不暢,可能會產生無法預料和無法解釋的結果,必須加速開發人機交流智能化模式。要在機器推論的運轉端下功夫。目前的「機器學習」「監督學習」與「強化學習」等已實現,但應不斷尋求突破,充分吸收各類技術手段,優化模型設計,完善資料庫建置。要在人機決策的分配端下功夫。人腦與機器各有優長,應著重強化「有人參與」下的人工智慧,合理界定人工智慧融入指揮決策的層級、範圍和程度,關鍵時介入人腦判斷,整體把控住人機協作的安全性和可靠性。

實現智慧化融入的高效有序

目前,以智慧化為核心、資訊化為基礎、網路化為標誌的軍事智慧化發展迅猛,世界各主要國家積極發掘人工智慧優勢,希冀做出比對手更快、更好的軍事決策,同時給對手製造更多決策困境。我們必須緊跟世界潮流,聚焦頂層設計,充分認識並發揮智慧技術對指揮決策的輔助支援作用,探索符合我軍特色的人機協同決策模式,引導指揮能力體系建構。要堅持系統指導,優化結構設計人機協同路徑。依照戰略、戰役、戰術層級作戰指揮的決策主旨、容量要求,區分指揮、控制、通訊等任務領域,兼顧「有人、無人」各自的優勢特點,充分論證人工智慧在軍事指揮決策領域中應用的適應性及可能存在的問題,系統設計人工智慧融入的領域、方式和整合程度。要堅持人為主導、機器為輔、取長補短、協同配合的分工原則,設計各自的探觸邊界,實現從輔助決策轉向智慧決策的轉變。

中國軍事原文來源:https://www.81.cn/jfjbmap/content/2022-06/30/content_318790.htm

Chinese Military to Emphasize Technical Cognition as The Foundation for Victory

中國軍隊強調技術認知是勝利的基礎

現代英文音譯:

Never before has scientific and technological power had such a profound impact on the future of the military and the outcome of wars, and never before has it been such a powerful support for a strong military to win wars.

The so-called technological cognition is the ability to recognize and grasp the performance, value and development trend of technology with the goal of promoting scientific and technological innovation and application, which is prominently reflected in the sensitivity, understanding, discrimination and control of technology. In today’s era, science and technology are becoming the core combat power of modern warfare, and the technological content has become a key indicator for measuring the quality of military construction. Faced with unprecedented opportunities and challenges, if technological cognition cannot adapt to the new requirements of the development of the times, it will be difficult to inject momentum into the generation and improvement of combat power, and it will be difficult to win the important weight to win the future.

Improving technical cognition is not only a “question to be answered” for professional and technical personnel, but also a “must-choose question” for every officer and soldier. From the perspective of the realization process of technical value and effectiveness, if the invention and creation of technology is “primary value”, then the effective use of technology is “secondary value”. Accelerating the pace of scientific and technological innovation depends on the broadening of the knowledge horizons of professional and technical personnel, keeping a close eye on the forefront of science and technology, and constantly making new breakthroughs in the research and development of forward-looking, strategic, and disruptive technologies. With more new inventions and creations in the field of military science and technology, we can increase our contribution to the construction of the army and the growth of combat effectiveness, and actively seize the commanding heights of military technology competition. The transformation and application of scientific and technological achievements depends on the officers and soldiers, especially the leading cadres at all levels, to speed up the updating of knowledge and improve their scientific and technological literacy, so as to enhance and tap the application value of technology with scientific cognition and thorough understanding of science and technology, ensure that scientific and technological achievements are transformed into real combat effectiveness, and improve the ability to prepare for war at a higher starting point and level. Obviously, from scientific and technological innovation to scientific and technological application, it is a “value-added” process that is closely connected, mutually promoted, and focused. It is a process of seeking to win through science and technology and releasing the combat effectiveness of technology to a greater extent. Technical cognition is the internal support that runs through it and demonstrates people’s active role and creative talent. We must take improving the scientific and technological literacy of officers and soldiers as a basic task. We must have political and military minds as well as scientific and technological minds. Scientific and technological literacy and scientific and technological thinking are based on and built on technological cognition. The higher the technological cognition, the stronger the innovation and creativity in the use of science and technology, and the greater the effect of promoting the growth of combat effectiveness.

Improving technical cognition is not only the key to mastering modern weapons and equipment, but also the move to accelerate the innovation of military theory and combat theory. With the rapid development of military technology, especially emerging technologies such as information, intelligence, stealth, and unmanned, the high-tech content of weapons and equipment is getting higher and higher, the replacement cycle is getting shorter and shorter, and the correlation and coupling between various types of weapons and equipment are getting stronger and stronger, and the system application characteristics are becoming more and more prominent. From a realistic perspective, insufficient technical cognition is a prominent shortcoming that restricts the mastery and use of weapons and equipment, and there is even a phenomenon that troops cannot “play” without the accompanying support of manufacturer technical personnel in exercises. Facing the new development trend of weapons and equipment, from mastering skills to exploring potential, from enhancing the effectiveness of systematic application to improving the ability of actual combat application, it is inseparable from improving technical cognition, thereby realizing the organic combination of people and weapons and equipment and obtaining a new “growth pole” in combat capability. It should also be noted that modern technology is penetrating into the military field with unprecedented strength, depth and breadth. The new military technology form accelerates the reconstruction of military theory and military system form, bringing about the deep interaction and deep integration of military technology and military theory, making technical cognition the “catalyst” of new combat theory. Practice has shown that without a thorough understanding of aviation technology, there will be no air combat theories such as air superiority; without a thorough understanding of information technology, there will be no information combat theories such as information superiority; without a thorough understanding of space technology, there will be no space combat theories such as “high frontier”. Similarly, if there is a lack of thorough understanding of the new features of artificial intelligence such as data-driven, human-machine collaboration, cross-border integration, and autonomous control, it will be impossible to create new theories and tactics such as intelligent combat and unmanned combat. Only with a technological cognitive advantage can we truly transform the military technology advantage into a theoretical leadership advantage and even a battlefield victory advantage.

Improving technology awareness is not only a way to distinguish the authenticity of technology and guard against technology fraud, but also a need to keenly perceive the development trend of military science and technology. It is worth being highly vigilant that Western media often promote and hype some so-called new technologies and new concepts, playing specious tricks. If you lack the ability to discern, cannot distinguish the true from the false, and believe everything you hear, you will inevitably fall into the technology trap set by others and become passive. Back then, the Soviet Union was led by the nose by the “Star Wars Plan” of the United States, and was confused by the Americans’ hype and deliberate fraud, which ultimately affected the entire military combat capability construction and the lesson was extremely painful. In the face of new opportunities and challenges brought about by the new round of scientific and technological revolution, we must maintain a high degree of technical acumen and insight, recognize the dominant direction and characteristics of the times in the development of military science and technology, and accurately grasp the trend of weapons and equipment developing in the direction of long-range precision, intelligence, stealth, and unmanned. The continuous emergence of disruptive technologies is profoundly changing the mode of generating combat power. Trend: new breakthroughs in high-tech will accelerate the development of new combat forces. Those military technologies that “change the rules of the game” will accelerate the evolution of war forms and combat methods. The integration of military technology and civilian technology is becoming deeper and deeper. We will strive to plan according to the situation, act according to the situation, and follow the trend, and make greater efforts to promote the development of the military through science and technology. Only by deepening the research on war and combat issues from the perspective of technological change, recognizing and grasping the characteristics, laws and winning mechanisms of informationized warfare from the influence of scientific and technological factors, and seeking breakthroughs in the innovation of combat theories and tactics by tapping into the effectiveness of technology, can we promote the precise and effective implementation of the strategy of developing the military through science and technology, lay a solid foundation and increase confidence for our military to remain invincible in future wars.

國語 中文:

●科技力量從未像今天這樣深刻影響軍隊未來和戰爭勝負,從未像今天這樣成為強軍勝戰的強力支撐。

所謂技術認知力,是以推動科技創新和運用為指向,對技術的性能功效、價值作用及發展趨勢的認識和把握能力,突出體現為對技術的敏銳度、理解力、甄別力、駕馭力。在當今時代,科技正成為現代戰爭的核心戰鬥力,科技含量成為衡量軍隊建設品質的關鍵指標。面對前所未有的機會與挑戰,如果技術認知力無法適應時代發展的新要求,就難以為戰鬥力的生成與提升注入動力,也難以贏得制勝未來的重要砝碼。

提高技術認知力,不僅是專業技術人員的“應答題”,更是每位官兵的“必選題”。從技術價值效能的實現過程來看,如果說技術的發明創造是“一次賦值”,那麼技術的有效運用就是“二次賦值”。加速科技創新步伐,有賴於廣大專業技術人員拓寬知識視野、緊盯科技前沿,不斷在前瞻性、戰略性、顛覆性技術的研發上取得新突破,以更多軍事科技領域的新發明新創造,提高對軍隊建設和戰鬥力成長的貢獻率,積極搶佔軍事技術競爭的製高點。實現科技成果的轉化應用,有賴於廣大官兵特別是各級領導幹部加快知識更新、提高科技素養,以對科技的科學認知、透徹理解,去提升和挖掘技術的應用價值,確保科技成果轉化為實實在在的戰鬥力,在更高起點和層次上提升備戰打仗能力。顯然,從科技創新到科技運用,是一個緊密銜接、相互促進、聚向發力的「賦值」過程,是一個謀求科技制勝、更大程度釋放技術作戰效能的過程,而技術認知力是貫穿其中彰顯人的能動作用、創造才能的內在支撐。要把提高官兵科技素養當作基礎性工作來抓。我們既要有政治頭腦、軍事頭腦,也要有科技頭腦。科技素養、科技頭腦以技術認知力為基礎和底蘊,技術認知力越高,運用科技的創新創造力就越強,促進戰鬥力增長的效應就越大。

提陞技術認知力,不僅是駕馭現代化武器裝備之要,更是加速推進軍事理論及作戰理論創新之舉。隨著軍事技術特別是資訊、智慧、隱形、無人等新興技術的快速發展,武器裝備高新技術含量越來越高,更新換代週期越來越短,且各型武器裝備之間的關聯度、耦合度越來越強,體系運用特點越來越突出。從現實來看,技術認知力不足是製約武器裝備掌握與運用的突出短板,甚至會出現部隊演訓離開廠家技術人員伴隨保障就「玩不轉」的現象。面對武器裝備發展的新態勢,從熟練技能到發掘潛能,從增強體系化運用效能到提升實戰化運用能力,都離不開通過提高技術認知力,進而實現人與武器裝備有機結合併獲得作戰能力新的「增長極」。也應看到,現代科技正以前所未有的力度、深度和廣度向軍事領域滲透,新的軍事技術形態加速推動軍事理論和軍事制度形態的重構,帶來軍事科技與軍事理論的深層互動、深度融合,使技術認知力成為新的作戰理論的「催生劑」。實踐表明,如果沒有對航空技術的透徹認知力,便不會有製空權等空戰理論的產生;如果沒有對信息技術的透徹認知力,便不會有製信息權等信息作戰理論的產生;如果沒有對空間技術的透徹認知力,便不會有「高邊疆」等太空作戰理論的產生。同樣,當下如果對人工智慧具有的數據驅動、人機協同、跨界融合、自主操控等新特徵缺乏透徹認知,就創造不出智慧作戰、無人作戰等新理論新戰法。有了技術認知優勢,才能真正把軍事技術優勢轉化為理論引領優勢,直到戰場制勝優勢。

提陞技術認知力,不僅是甄別技術真偽、謹防技術欺詐之策,更是敏銳洞察軍事科技發展趨向走勢之需。值得高度警覺的是,西方媒體常常宣傳炒作一些所謂的新技術新概念,玩弄似是而非的障眼法,如果缺乏甄別力,辨不清真偽,聽風就是雨,就難免落入他人設置的技術陷阱,造成被動局面。當年,蘇聯被美國搞的「星球大戰計畫」牽著鼻子走,被美國人的大肆渲染、故意欺詐弄得暈頭轉向,最後影響了整個軍事作戰能力建設,教訓極為慘痛。面對新一輪科技革命帶來的新機遇、新挑戰,必須保持高度的技術敏銳度和洞察力,認清軍事科技發展的主導方向和時代特徵,準確把握武器裝備向遠程精確化、智能化、隱身化、無人化方向發展的趨勢,不斷湧現的顛覆性技術正深刻改變戰鬥力生成模式的趨勢,高新技術的新突破將加快推進新型作戰力量發展的趨勢,那些「改變遊戲規則」的軍事技術將加速戰爭形態和作戰方式嬗變的趨勢,軍用技術和民用技術的融合度越來越深的趨勢,努力做到因勢而謀、應勢而動、順勢而為,下更大氣力推動科技興軍。惟有善於從技術變革視角去深化戰爭和作戰問題研究,從科技因素影響去認識和把握資訊化戰爭的特點規律、制勝機理,從挖掘技術效能去尋求作戰理論和戰法創新的突破,才能推動科技興軍精準落地、有效落實,為我軍在未來戰爭中立於不敗之地夯實基礎、增添底氣。

中國軍事資料來源: http://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/jmsd/4845888.html

Chinese Government Mandate for Military Cognitive Confrontation : Focus on Cognitive Domain Penetration Emphasizing Multi-domain Operations

中國政府對軍事認知對抗的要求:著重認知域滲透,強調多域作戰

現代英語翻譯:

Introduction

From the battlefield of “bows, horses, and swords” in the cold weapon era to the three-dimensional battlefield of land, sea, and air in the industrial era, and then to the integrated battlefield covering multiple domains such as physics, information, and cognition in the information and intelligent era, one of the core logics of the evolution of war forms is to continuously enter new domains and integrate multiple domains. Cross-domain aggregation of combat effectiveness has become a war-winning mechanism with certain basic and decisive characteristics. In this process, the cognitive domain has increasingly become a new battlefield that infiltrates and affects multi-domain operations, as well as a new commanding height that determines the success or failure of the war.

The cognitive domain has become the key to seizing comprehensive control

In modern warfare, the cognitive domain has become the key to seizing comprehensive control. War practice shows that the cognitive domain has increasingly become the focus of planning modern warfare and achieving multi-domain integrated linkage victory.

The cognitive domain advantage supports the doubling of multi-domain combat effectiveness. In modern warfare, destroying the enemy and preserving oneself in the physical domain, fighting for the right to control land, sea, air, and space; blocking the enemy and connecting oneself in the information domain, fighting for the right to control the network and information, are all deeply related to the advantages and active position of the cognitive domain. In the game of system-to-system confrontation, once the opponent is suppressed and the initiative is taken in the cognitive domain, decision-making interference can be formed on the key nodes of the enemy’s command chain, kill chain, and support chain, so that the actions in the physical domain and information domain can obtain asymmetric benefits of “four ounces to move a thousand pounds”, thereby improving the input-output ratio of operations, enhancing the speed and efficiency of local victory leading to global victory, and reducing the subsequent constraints of military strikes in the economic and social life fields.

The planning and implementation of multi-domain combat operations should pay attention to the role of the cognitive domain. Modern warfare is significantly complex, and the elements of multi-domain operations are interconnected, the impact is transmitted in multiple directions, and the risks are superimposed on each other. Every action or even a detail of a multi-domain combat operation will trigger a chain reaction in the cognitive domain at the decision-making issues, military morale, public opinion, social confidence, and international public opinion levels of both sides, thereby quickly, suddenly, and unexpectedly affecting the overall situation of the war, and even causing a “butterfly storm” that changes the internal and foreign affairs of the warring parties and even the long-term development trend of the country. In planning and implementing physical domain and information domain operations, we must not only focus on shaping the situation and creating conditions in the cognitive domain, but also accurately control the direction and size of the release of effectiveness in the cognitive domain in accordance with the need to seize control of the brain, heart, and intelligence. The dynamic changes in the number of enemy annihilation, the temporary gains and losses of a city or a place, etc., are increasingly losing their significance as indicators for evaluating the direction of the war. The overall impact of military operations on the war situation increasingly needs to be evaluated and considered from the perspectives of the changes in international and domestic public cognition and the psychological impact on specific objects.

The material and technical conditions for the cognitive domain to trigger multi-domain integration are becoming increasingly mature. The leapfrog development of information-based intelligent cognitive perception technology has made the cognitive domain game confrontation rapidly develop from absolute “uncalculated” and “uncontrollable” to a considerable degree of “calculated” and “controllable”. The decision-making support of technologies such as big data and intelligent algorithms supports the deep integration of different combat forces in the cognitive domain and the command and coordination of multi-dimensional forces, strengthens the consistency and coordination of forces, means and actions in politics, economy, diplomacy, culture and military, and brings the operability of designing multiple domains, commanding multiple domains and controlling multiple domains with a focus on the cognitive domain. The widespread use of weapons and equipment such as drones and precision-guided bombs also provides realistic and feasible tactical options for precise strikes through combat operations. The rapid popularization of intelligent communication technologies such as precise profiling, intelligent distribution, social media live broadcast, robot writing, and virtual reality, and the cross-integration and development of neuroscience, cognitive science and intelligent technology have made it convenient and efficient to plan and implement “X+ cognitive attack and defense” and realize integrated joint operations.

Cognitive domain penetration affects the winning path of multi-domain aggregation

Cognitive domain penetration affects the integrated linkage of multiple domains. It is not a simple “1+1”, but the energy of multi-domain actions is instantly optimized in the cognitive domain, so as to continuously inject the emergence effect that is beneficial to oneself into the overall situation of the war. To this end, it is necessary to strengthen the innovative design of combat planning and implementation paths to ensure that multi-domain convergence and victory are achieved under the influence of cognitive domain penetration.

Deepen the understanding of multi-domain tasks with cognitive domain combat needs. Focusing on the overall national strategy, clarify the cognitive domain combat needs, and calculate and determine the combat tasks of each domain based on this. Establish the must-hit targets and avoidance targets of firepower strikes, the first targets and the last targets, the open targets and the hidden targets, the heavy targets and the light targets, etc., and focus on the effectiveness of destroying the morale of the combat opponent. Establish the goals, timing, and intensity of channel control, and focus on the deprivation of the combat opponent’s social mobilization capabilities, international communication capabilities, etc., and the support effectiveness for our information release and external propaganda. Establish the focus of intelligence information collection, and focus on the ability to grasp the combat opponent’s cognitive domain combat power, describe the characteristics of cognitive attack and defense targets in fine granularity, and dynamically grasp the international and domestic public opinion and social trends.

Guide multi-domain action design with cognitive domain combat tasks. Focusing on the questions of “who, what kind of cognitive impact, and to what extent”, the cognitive domain combat tasks in different combat phases and different combat scenarios are subdivided, and based on this, the overall planning and detailed design of what actions to organize in each domain, what opportunities to seize, what forces to invest, what tactics to adopt, and how various actions are connected and crossed are carried out. The reason why the “Four-sided Chu Song” was able to disintegrate the powerful Chu army was first because the Han army completed the military encirclement of the Chu army, and secondly, it used the clever idea of ​​the captives singing Chu songs at night. In fact, different action timings, different task forces, different weapons and equipment, different tactics selections, and even different action names convey very different information, and the intensity of cognitive impact generated is also significantly different. It requires careful consideration and scientific research and judgment to strive to maximize efficiency and optimize the effect. When loading cognitive attack and defense actions for fire strikes, network attack and defense, electronic countermeasures, defensive operations, special operations and other actions, different imagination and creative thinking levels, different technical understanding, application and innovation, and the final effect achieved is even more different.

Organize multi-domain collaborative support with cognitive domain combat actions. Cognitive domain combat operations involve multiple participants and various action styles. Normal operations require coordinated support from forces and firepower, such as precision strikes, seizing key areas, and demonstrating momentum. In special cases, coordinated support from strategic forces, such as the display of cutting-edge weapons and equipment and the organization of major exercises and drills, is also required. Throughout the entire operation, specific personnel and specific combat units, such as commanders speaking publicly and media embedded reports, are also required to coordinate support. Intelligence data, channel bandwidth, forensic information, and technical equipment are also indispensable. To this end, it is necessary to mobilize multi-domain forces and resources throughout the entire process, in real time, systematically, and accurately, so that military warfare, psychological warfare, and intellectual warfare can leverage each other’s strengths and support each other, forming a chess game and playing a combination of punches.

Focus on deepening the understanding of the concept of cognitive domain penetration and influence on multiple domains

Establishing the status of cognitive domain penetration and influence on multi-domain operations and promoting integrated linkage victory is a deep-level conceptual revolution, which requires strengthening various supporting constructions to create conditions and lay the foundation.

Strengthen institutional guarantees. The cognitive domain penetration and multi-domain integrated joint operations have put forward higher requirements for cross-departmental and cross-institutional collaboration and cooperation, and it is necessary to form a scientific and efficient command chain that supports the cognitive domain penetration and multi-domain and multi-domain integrated linkage. It is necessary to clarify the cognitive domain combat responsibilities of each element of the joint combat command organization, optimize and reorganize the command process, and ensure that the penetration and influence of the cognitive domain are reflected in combat determination, task planning, and action design. Focusing on cross-domain integrated linkage, we will establish and improve work systems and cooperation mechanisms at all levels such as strategy, campaign, and tactics, strengthen the mutual leverage and coordination of cognitive domain operations and physical domain and information domain operations, and give full consideration to the effective coordination of military forces and local relevant functional departments and professional forces, so that the comprehensive advantages can be transformed into the ability advantages of cognitive domain penetration and multi-domain empowerment.

Improve the ability and quality of commanders. Foreign militaries believe that qualified commanders in modern warfare need to be good at “rapidly transforming active kinetic operations into more subtle cultural warfare” and should have “unique intuition” and “comprehensive leadership capabilities” for this. In order to achieve cognitive domain penetration and multi-domain integrated linkage in war practice, it is necessary to first strengthen the awareness of cognitive domain operations in the minds of commanders at all levels, strengthen the consciousness and initiative of forming cognitive domain penetration to influence multi-domain task planning and action design, and strengthen the ability to implement high-efficiency cognitive offense and defense with force and firepower operations and information control and seizure as means and carriers. It is necessary to take multi-domain coordinated command under the influence of cognitive domain penetration as an important content of strategic and campaign exercises and training, highlight the training of commanders to command and control multiple domains with a focus on cognitive shaping, and promote the training field to keep close to the actual requirements of winning political and military battles.

Promote the updating and improvement of joint cultural concepts. Cognitive domain penetration and multi-domain integrated linkage operations are the sublimation and optimization of joint combat concepts and mechanisms, and especially require the support and guarantee of joint cultural construction that is adapted to them. On the one hand, we must strive to break the influence of traditional war thinking patterns, break some traditional concept barriers, and focus on cognitive guidance, multi-domain integration, and linkage operations as the forefront of joint cultural construction to update concepts. On the other hand, we must strengthen the construction of a theoretical system for cognitive domain penetration and multi-domain integrated joint operations, conduct in-depth research on the winning mechanism of cognitive domain operations and innovation of tactics, and lay a solid ideological foundation with theoretical accumulation.

(Author’s unit: Political College of National Defense University)

現代國語大五:

引言

從冷兵器時代「弓馬騎射、刀兵相接」式戰場到工業化時代的陸、海、空三維戰場,再到資訊化智能化時代涵蓋物理、資訊、認知等多域的一體戰場,戰爭形態演進的核心邏輯之一即在於不斷邁入新域、整合多域。跨域聚合作戰效能,成為帶有某種基礎性和決定性的戰爭制勝機制。而在此過程中,認知域日益成為滲透影響多域作戰的新戰場,以及攸關戰爭成敗的新的製高點。

認知域成為奪控綜合製權的關鍵

在現代戰爭中,認知域成為奪控綜合製權的關鍵。戰爭實踐表明,認知域日益成為運籌現代戰爭、實現多域一體聯動制勝的重心所在。

認知域優勢支援實現多域作戰效能倍增。現代戰爭中,在物理域消滅敵人、保存自己,爭奪制陸、製海、制空、制天權;在資訊域阻斷敵人、連結自己,爭奪制網、制資訊權,都與認知域的優勢和主動地位有著極為深刻的關聯。在體系對體系的對壘博弈中,一旦在認知域壓制對手、掌握主動,就能對敵指揮鏈、殺傷鏈、保障鏈的關鍵節點形成決策幹擾,使得物理域信息域的行動獲得“四兩撥千斤”的非對稱收益,從而提高作戰的投入產出比,增強局部勝利導向全局勝利的速度和效率,減少軍事打擊在經濟社會生活領域所產生的後續掣肘。

規劃實施多域作戰行動應重視認知域作用發揮。現代戰爭具有顯著的複雜性,多域作戰之間的要素相互連結、影響多向傳遞、風險彼此疊加。多域作戰行動的每個動作甚至某個細節都會在敵我雙方的決策議題、軍心意志、民意關切、社會信心、國際輿論等層面引發認知域連鎖反應,由此迅速、突然、出乎預料地影響戰爭全局,甚至釀成改變交戰方內政外交時局乃至國家長期發展走勢的「蝴蝶風暴」。規劃實施物理域資訊域行動,既要著重在認知域塑造態勢、創造條件,又要按照奪控制腦、制心、制智權的需要,在認知域精準控制效能釋放的方向和大小。殲敵數字的動態變化、一城一地的一時得失等,本身越來越失去評價戰局走向的指標意義,軍事行動對於戰局的整體影響,越來越需要從其引發的國際國內公眾認知改變和對特定對象的心理影響等層次去評估考量。

認知域引發多域一體連動的物質和技術條件日漸成熟。資訊化智慧化認知感知技術的飛躍發展,使得認知域博弈對抗由絕對的「不可算」「不可控」快速地向相當程度上的「可算」「可控」發展。大數據、智慧演算法等技術的輔助決策,支撐了對不同作戰力量在認知域的深度融合、多維聚力的指揮協同,加強了政治、經濟、外交、文化、軍事等方面力量、手段和行動的一致性協調性,帶來了著眼於認知域設計多域、指揮多域、控制多域的可操作性。無人機、精確導引炸彈等武器裝備的廣泛使用,也為透過作戰行動點穴式精準打擊提供了現實可行的戰術方案選項。精準畫像、智慧分發、社群媒體直播、機器人寫作、虛擬實境等智慧化傳播技術的快速普及,神經科學、認知科學與智慧科技的交叉融合發展,使規劃實施「X+認知攻防」、實現一體聯動作戰變得便捷有效率。

認知域滲透影響多域的聚優制勝路徑

認知域滲透影響多域一體聯動,不是簡單的“1+1”,而是將多域行動的能量在認知域即時聚優,從而將有利於己的湧現效應不斷注入戰爭全局。為此,需要加強對作戰規劃和實施路徑的創新設計,確保在認知域滲透影響下實現多域聚優制勝。

以認知域作戰需求加深多域任務理解。著眼國家戰略全局,明確認知域作戰需求,據此倒推測算和確定各域作戰任務。確立火力打擊的必打目標和避打目標、先打目標和後打目標、明打目標和暗打目標、重打目標和輕打目標等,要重點考慮對作戰對手軍心士氣的瓦解效能。確立頻道奪控的目標、時機、強度等,要重點考慮對作戰對手社會動員能力、國際傳播能力等的剝奪效能和對我訊息釋放、對外宣傳的支撐效能。確立情報資訊蒐集的重點,要重點考慮掌握作戰對手認知域作戰力量、細顆粒描述認知攻防目標對象特徵、動態掌握國際國內輿情和社會思潮動態等方面的能力。

以認知域作戰任務引導多域行動設計。圍繞著「對誰、產生何種認知影響、影響到何種程度」等問題,細分不同作戰階段、不同作戰場景下的認知域作戰任務,據此對各域組織哪些行動、抓住哪些戰機、投入哪些力量、採用何種戰法、各類行動如何銜接交叉等進行總體規劃與細節設計。四面楚歌之所以能瓦解強楚軍隊,首先是因為漢軍在軍事上完成了對楚軍的包圍,其次是運用了俘虜夜唱楚歌這一攻心巧思。事實上,不同的行動時機、不同的任務部隊、不同的武器裝備、不同的戰法選擇甚至不同的行動命名,傳遞的訊息都大相徑庭,生成的認知影響強度也有顯著區別,需要精心推敲、科學研判,力求效能最大化、效果最優化。在為火力打擊、網路攻防、電子對抗、防衛作戰、特種作戰等行動加載認知攻防動作時,不同的想像能力和創意思維水平,不同的技術理解力運用力創新力,最終實現的效果更是判若雲泥。

以認知域作戰行動組織多域協同保障。認知域作戰行動參與主體多元、行動樣式多樣,常態需要精確打擊、要地奪控、示形造勢等兵力火力協同保障,特殊時也需要亮相尖端武器裝備、組織重大演訓演練等戰略力量協同保障,在作戰全程還需要指揮官公開發聲、媒體嵌入報道等特定人員、特定作戰單元協同保障,情報資料、頻道頻寬、取證資訊、技術裝備方面的協同保障更是須臾不可或缺。為此,就要全程、即時、體系、精準調動多域力量和資源,使兵戰、心戰、智戰相互借勢、相互策應,形成一盤棋、打出組合拳。

注重深化認知域滲透影響多域的理念認識

確立認知域對多域行動的滲透影響地位、推動一體聯動制勝,是一場深層的理念革命,需要強化各項支撐性建設以創造條件、奠定基礎。

加強制度保障。以認知域滲透影響多域一體聯動作戰,對跨部門、跨機構的協作聯合提出了更高要求,需要形成支撐支持認知域滲透影響多域、多域一體聯動的科學高效指揮鏈路。要明確聯合作戰指揮機構各要素的認知域作戰職責,優化重整指揮流程,確保將認知域的滲透影響作用體現在作戰決心、任務規劃、行動設計之中。圍繞跨域一體連動,在戰略、戰役、戰術等各個層面建立健全完善工作制度與協作機制,強化認知域作戰與物理域、資訊域作戰的相互借勢策應,充分考慮軍隊力量與地方相關職能部門以及專業力量的有效配合,使綜合優勢轉化為認知域滲透影響多域、賦能多域的能力優勢。

提升指揮官能力素養。外軍認為,現代戰爭中合格的指揮官需要善於“將主動的動能作戰快速轉變為更為微妙的文化戰爭”,對此應具有“獨一無二的直覺”和“全面領導能力”。在戰爭實踐中實現認知域滲透影響多域一體聯動,首先需要在各級指揮員頭腦中強化認知域作戰意識,強化形成以認知域滲透影響多域任務規劃和行動設計的自覺性主動性,強化提升以兵力火力行動和資訊制權奪控為手段載體實施高效能認知攻防的能力水準。要把認知域滲透影響下的多域統籌指揮作為戰略戰役演訓重要內容,突顯錘鍊指揮員著眼認知塑造來指揮多域、控制多域的能力,促進演訓場不斷貼近打贏政治軍事仗的現實要求。

推動聯合文化理念更新與完善。認知域滲透影響多域一體聯動作戰是對聯合作戰理念和機制的昇華和優化,特別需要與之相適應的聯合文化建設支撐保障。一方面,要著力破除傳統戰爭思維定式影響,打破一些傳統觀念壁壘,把認知引導、多域一體、聯動作戰作為聯合文化建設的前沿重點抓好理念更新。另一方面,要加強認知域滲透影響多域一體聯動作戰的理論體系建設,深入展開認知域作戰制勝機理研究與戰法創新,以理論累積打牢思想根基。

(作者單位:國防大學政治學院)

2023-01-19 14:35 解放軍報 濮端華 李習文 肖飛

中國政府原文來源:

中國軍隊從“網路戰”到“馬賽克戰”

Chinese Military From “Cyber Warfare” to “Mosaic Warfare”

繁體中文原文:

理論是行動的先導。 加強作戰理念創新、推動作戰指導創新一直是世界各國軍隊培養軍事優勢的重要途徑。 近年來,美軍先後提出「網路戰」、「馬賽克戰」等前線作戰理論,以實現作戰模式的「生產關係」能夠更適應「生產力」的發展的作戰能力。 透過這兩種作戰理論的比較分析,世人可以一窺美軍作戰能力建設思維的變化,特別是對「馬賽克戰」制勝機制的認識,從而有的放矢,找到有效的把關。和餘額。

● 從威脅反應到戰爭設計—

積極塑造並推動作戰能力提升

「基於威脅」或「基於能力」是軍事作戰能力建構的兩種基本方式。 「威脅為本」體現需求牽引,著力解決近中期實際問題,是軍隊作戰能力建構應遵循的基本法則; 「能力為本」體現目標牽引,瞄準未來戰略任務,以新作戰理論支撐戰略理念,是軍事行動的關鍵。 這樣,才能實現能力的創新與超越。 從「網路戰」到「馬賽克戰」的發展,體現了上述兩種方式內在規律的差異和演變,也體現了近年來美軍推進作戰能力建設的思路和理念的變化。

觀念開始改變。 網路空間最初是為了解決人類的交流需求而創建的。 後來逐漸演變為獨立於陸、海、空、天的新作戰域。 由此衍生出以爭奪網路空間主導權為核心的「網路空間」。 相較之下,「馬賽克戰」是美軍為維持戰略優勢、直接針對競爭對手而主動研發設計的新作戰理念。其形成過程體現了需求驅動與能力驅動相結合、戰略性、主動性、牽引力更加突出。

技術應用新思路。 「網路戰」強調發展新一代技術來支持作戰理念的轉變和實施。 《馬賽克戰》突破了這個模式,並不過度強調新一代裝備技術的研發。 更注重軍民共性技術的快速轉化和成熟技術的漸進式迭代。 其基本想法是,依照叫車、眾籌開發等服務平台的應用理念,在現有裝備的基礎上,透過模組升級和智慧化改造,將各種作戰系統單元「鑲嵌」成單功能、可靈活組裝的單元。 、易於更換的“積木”或“像素”,建構動態協調、高度自主、無縫整合的作戰系統,體現新技術驅動的概念。

路徑開發新設計。 「網路戰」是網路空間的一個伴隨概念。 網路空間發展到哪裡,「網路戰」就會隨之而來。 一般來說,我們在進行「主觀」概念設計之前,先考慮「客觀」物質條件。 ,對路徑發展有很強的依賴。 「馬賽克戰」首先從「主觀」演變為「客觀」。 透過開發能夠動態調整職能結構的部隊設計模型,能夠適應不同的作戰需求和戰場環境的變化。

可見,與以往的「網路戰」等作戰概念相比,「馬賽克戰」目標更明確、技術更成熟、路徑更可靠,體現了美軍積極塑造的思維轉變。

● 從網路中心到決策中心—

群體智慧實現系統能量優化釋放

人工智慧技術是資訊時代的關鍵變量,也是「馬賽克戰」體系發展的核心增量。 “網路戰”強調“網路中心”,而“馬賽克戰”緊緊圍繞著人工智慧技術核心,將制勝關鍵從“網路中心”調整為“決策中心”,將作戰系統架構從“從系統級到平台級的聯盟轉變為功能級、要素級的融合,尋求在網路能量充分匯聚的前提下,利用群體智慧技術實現系統能量的最佳化釋放,賦予網路新的內涵。智慧戰爭的致勝機制

時代。

用“快”控制“慢”,在認知上佔上風。 未來戰爭中,戰場情勢瞬息萬變,時間元素的權重將持續上升。 「快」與「慢」可以產生近乎尺寸縮小的戰鬥打擊效果。 「馬賽克戰」利用資料資訊技術與人工智慧技術,提升己方「OODA」循環的單循環決策速度,擴大並行決策的廣度,降低群循環決策的粒度,加快系統運作進度,整體打造領先一步的典範。 「先發制人」的姿態旨在牢牢掌控戰場認知決策的主導地位。

用“低”控“高”,累積成本優勢。 與追求高端武器平台的傳統作戰概念不同,「馬賽克戰」著重於利用人工智慧技術挖掘現有武器平台和作戰資源的潛力並提高效率。 透過在眾多中低階武器平台上載入並運行智慧演算法和特定功能模組,可以實現與高階武器平台相媲美的作戰性能。 這整體提高了武器平台投入產出的成本效益,進而累積成本優勢。

以“散”控“聚”,求可持續生存。 「馬賽克戰」強調運用去中心化思想和非對稱制衡,利用開放的系統架構,在各種有人/無人平台上去中心化配置偵察、定位、通信、打擊等各種功能,實現力量的分佈式部署。 同時利用智慧演算法,提升各平台的自組織、自協調、獨立攻擊能力,進而實現集中火力。 當部分作戰平台被消滅、打亂或剝離時,整個作戰體系仍能正常運行,進而增強部隊集群的戰場生存能力。

用“動”控“靜”,提高系統靈活性。 「馬賽克戰」強調進一步突破各作戰領域的障礙。 透過將不同作戰域的固定“殺傷鏈”變成動態可重構的“殺傷網”,將“OODA”大環拆解為小環,將單環分化為多環。 根據作戰流程和作戰需求的變化,依靠智慧組網,實現作戰力量的動態分割、動態部署、動態組合。 這樣,一方面可以增強作戰系統的彈性和適應性; 另一方面,它也可以抵消複雜網路的節點聚合效應,使對手很難找到關鍵節點來擊敗自己的系統。

「馬賽克戰爭」為智慧戰爭提供了參考原型。 但同時,「馬賽克戰爭」作為一種理想化的力量設計與運用框架,也需要與其密切相關的技術、條令、政策等支撐支撐。 距離完全實現還有很長的路要走。 與傳統戰爭相比,系統共存的局面將長期存在。

● 從要素整合到系統重組—

動態結構增強作戰系統靈活性

結構和關係常常決定功能和屬性。 「網路戰」與「馬賽克戰」建立在資訊時代相同的物質基礎上,遵循相同的演化範式,但係統建構的原理和效果不同。 「網路戰」所形成的架構可以靜態解構,而「馬賽克戰」則依照一定的建構規則動態組合功能單元,形成具有自組織和自適應特性的彈性架構,類似「動態黑盒子」。 常規手段難以追蹤和預測。 這種靈活的結構經常「湧現」新的能力,以增強和提高作戰系統的效率。

網路與雲端融合發展,使作戰空間和時間更具動態性和可塑性。 網際網路和雲端是資訊作戰系統運作的基礎環境。 它們重塑了傳統作戰中的情報、指揮、攻擊、支援等流程要素,同時衍生出新的作戰時空。 「網路戰」主要針對網路空間,其作戰時間和空間相對靜態。 「馬賽克戰」並不限於單一的作戰空間。 在資訊基礎設施網路隨雲而動、雲端網融合的發展趨勢下

無形空間和無形空間可以進一步鉸接,作戰空間和時間的界限更加靈活,作戰資源的配置更加靈活。 戰鬥架構更加動態。

數據跨域流動,使戰鬥控制更加無縫協調。 在指揮控制環節,「網路戰」著重於聯合作戰指揮機構對作戰單位的指揮控制,資料的跨域交換與流動主要集中在戰區戰場。 「馬賽克戰」將聯合作戰的水平進一步降低到戰術端。 透過戰術層面資料的獨立跨域交換和無縫流動,可以將各種資料孤島按需聚集成資料集群,從而產生顯著的「溢出」效應,使得資料的動態、離散、敏捷、並行的特性作戰指揮控制迴路更加明顯,更有利於實現各作戰單元按需敏捷連動、高效協同行動。

演算法穿透各個維度,讓系統運作更自主、更有效率。 演算法是人類意識在網路空間的映射,形成兩種基本形式:意圖轉化的編譯碼和知識轉化的神經網路。 在《網路戰》中,大量使用編譯程式碼,而神經網路僅在本地使用。 在「馬賽克戰爭」中,演算法拓展到塑造規則和提供引擎兩大關鍵功能,應用的廣度和深度更為凸顯。 塑造規則以編譯碼為主,神經網路為輔,建構「馬賽克戰」系統的流程架構與運作邏輯,為其不確定性、適應性和「突現」能力奠定結構基礎; 提供引擎主要整合智慧演算法模型,分送到邊緣要素進行運算,形成知識擴散效應,從而全面提升「馬賽克戰」系統的智慧自主作戰能力。

邊緣能量的獨立釋放,讓戰鬥方式更靈活多元。 邊緣是各種有人/無人作戰功能單元的抽像模型,也是系統能力「湧現」的直接來源。 在「網路戰」體系中,邊緣要素與上級和下級指揮控制流程緊密耦合,處於精確控制狀態。 在「馬賽克戰爭」系統中,邊緣要素的感知、互動、推理、決策能力大幅提升。 其「OODA」循環無需回溯至上級指揮機構,有利於支撐形成高低、有人/無人的分散組合。 優化的作戰集群形態可以賦予邊緣分子更多的自組織權威,顯著增強戰場對抗優勢。

可見,如果說「網路戰」被稱為精密的戰爭機器,那麼「馬賽克戰」則可以被視為一個能夠激發作戰能力動態增長的複雜「生態」。 網路雲、資料、演算法和邊緣設備產生的新技術變化促進了動態且複雜的「架構」的形成。 這種結構反過來又對要素、平台和系統進行反向調節,不斷湧現新的能力,對作戰系統的賦能和演進發揮重要作用。

● 從制度突破到複合對抗——

分析利弊,尋求有效制衡

「馬賽克戰」在某種程度上代表了未來聯合作戰的可能發展方向。 要充分研究掌握「馬賽克戰」制勝機制,將資訊通信領域塑造成為打破傳統戰爭時空界限的新領域,打造雲化作戰新理念,建構強大的資訊通訊領域新格局。國防資訊基礎設施保障能力。 突顯軍事資訊網路安全防禦能力,增強戰略戰役指揮機構運作的基礎支撐能力,不斷完善網路資訊體系。

另一方面,「馬賽克戰」理論的出現,使得傳統作戰手段難以透過搶先並控制有限的目標節點來達到毀點、斷環的系統破局效果。 但也應該看到,任何制度都有其固有的矛盾。 即便是看似“無懈可擊”的去中心化結構的“馬賽克戰爭”,依然能找到有效破解的方法。 例如,掌握系統的複雜性特徵,利用其相關性和依賴性,突顯通訊網路的功能抑制

建構網路和電力複合攻擊路徑,實現作戰系統各單元的拆解和隔離; 掌握其結構的耗散特性,利用其對外部資訊的依賴,凸顯資訊資料的偽裝性和誤導性,促使作戰系統轉變為資訊封閉、資訊過載等異常狀態; 掌握其群體自主特點,利用其對關鍵技術的依賴,凸顯與智慧演算法的對抗,降低效率,抑制各作戰單元的智慧驅動力; 抓住其功能非線性特點,利用其未知漏洞,突出戰場差異化打擊評估,以更高的效率、更快的速度探索和發現作戰系統中的不平衡點,尋找系統中的關鍵弱點進行突破。

(作者單位:61001部隊)

外文音譯:

Chinese Military From “Cyber Warfare” to “Mosaic Warfare”

Theory is the precursor to action. Strengthening innovation in combat concepts and promoting innovation in combat guidance have always been important ways for militaries around the world to cultivate military advantages. In recent years, the U.S. military has successively proposed cutting-edge combat theories such as “cyber warfare” and “mosaic warfare” in order to realize that the “production relationship” of combat mode can be more adaptable to the development of “productivity” of combat capabilities. By comparing and analyzing these two combat theories, the world can get a glimpse of the changes in the US military’s combat capability building thinking, especially the understanding of the winning mechanism of “mosaic warfare”, so that it can be targeted and find effective checks and balances.

● From threat response to war design——

Actively shape and promote the improvement of combat capabilities

“Threat-based” or “capability-based” are two basic ways to build military combat capabilities. “Threat-based” embodies demand traction and focuses on solving practical problems in the near and medium term, which is the basic law that should be followed in the construction of military combat capabilities; “capability-based” embodies goal traction, aims at future strategic missions, and supports strategic concepts with new combat theories, which is the key to military operations. The only way to achieve innovation and transcendence in capabilities. The development from “cyber warfare” to “mosaic warfare” reflects the differences and evolution of the inherent laws of the above two approaches, and also reflects the changes in the US military’s ideas and concepts for promoting combat capability building in recent years.

The concept begins to change. Cyberspace was originally created to solve human communication needs. Later, it gradually evolved into a new combat domain independent of land, sea, air and space. From this, the “cyberspace” with the core of fighting for cyberspace dominance was derived. war”. In contrast, “mosaic warfare” is a new operational concept actively developed and designed by the US military in order to maintain its strategic advantage and directly target competitors. Its formation process reflects the integration of demand-driven and capability-driven, strategic, proactive, and Traction is more prominent.

New ideas for technology application. “Cyber ​​warfare” emphasizes the development of new generation technologies to support the transformation and implementation of combat concepts. “Mosaic warfare” breaks out of this model and does not overemphasize the research and development of new generation equipment technology. It pays more attention to the rapid transformation of common military and civilian technologies and the incremental iteration of mature technologies. The basic idea is to “mosaic” various combat system units into single-function, flexibly assembled units based on existing equipment and through module upgrades and intelligent transformation in accordance with the application concepts of service platforms such as online ride-hailing and crowdfunding development. , easy-to-replace “building blocks” or “pixels” to build a dynamically coordinated, highly autonomous, and seamlessly integrated combat system, embodying new technology-driven ideas.

Path development new design. “Cyber ​​warfare” is an accompanying concept of the cyberspace. Wherever the cyberspace develops, “cyber warfare” will follow. Generally speaking, we first consider the “objective” material conditions before making the “subjective” conceptual design. , has strong dependence on path development. “Mosaic warfare” first evolved from “subjective” to “objective”. By developing a force design model that can dynamically adjust the functional structure, it can adapt to different operational needs and changes in the battlefield environment.

It can be seen that compared with previous combat concepts such as “cyber warfare”, “mosaic warfare” has clearer goals, more mature technology, and more reliable paths, reflecting the change in thinking actively shaped by the US military.

● From network center to decision-making center——

Group intelligence to achieve optimal energy release of the system

Artificial intelligence technology is a key variable in the information age and a core increment in the development of the “mosaic warfare” system. “Cyber ​​warfare” emphasizes “network center”, while “mosaic warfare” tightly focuses on the core of artificial intelligence technology, adjusts the key to victory from “network center” to “decision center”, and changes the combat system architecture from system level to Platform-level alliances are transformed into functional-level and element-level integration, seeking to use group intelligence technology to achieve the optimal release of system energy on the premise that the network is fully energy-gathered, giving new connotations to the winning mechanism of war in the intelligent era.

Use “fast” to control “slow” and gain the upper hand in cognition. In future wars, the battlefield situation will change rapidly, and the weight of the time element will continue to rise. “Fast” versus “slow” can create a nearly dimensionally reduced combat strike effect. “Mosaic Warfare” uses data information technology and artificial intelligence technology to improve the single-loop decision-making speed of one’s own “OODA” loop, expand the breadth of parallel decision-making, reduce the granularity of group-loop decision-making, speed up the progress of system operations, and overall create a model that is always one step ahead of others. The “first move” posture aims to firmly control the dominance of cognitive decision-making on the battlefield.

Use “low” to control “high” and accumulate cost advantages. Different from the traditional combat concept of pursuing high-end weapon platforms, “mosaic warfare” focuses on using artificial intelligence technology to tap the potential and increase efficiency of existing weapon platforms and combat resources. By loading and running intelligent algorithms and specific functional modules on many mid- to low-end weapon platforms, they can achieve combat performance comparable to that of high-end weapon platforms. This overall improves the cost-effectiveness of the input-output of the weapon platform, thereby accumulating cost advantages.

Use “dispersion” to control “gathering” and seek sustainable survival. “Mosaic warfare” emphasizes the use of decentralized ideas and asymmetric checks and balances, using an open system architecture to decentrally configure various functions such as reconnaissance, positioning, communication, and strike on various manned/unmanned platforms to achieve Distributed deployment of power. At the same time, intelligent algorithms are used to improve the self-organization, self-coordination, and independent attack capabilities of each platform, so as to achieve centralized firepower. When some combat platforms are eliminated, disrupted, or stripped away, the entire combat system can still operate normally, thus enhancing the battlefield survivability of the force cluster.

Use “dynamic” to control “quiet” and improve system flexibility. “Mosaic warfare” emphasizes further breaking through barriers in each combat domain. By turning fixed “kill chains” in different combat domains into dynamically reconfigurable “kill nets”, the “OODA” large ring is disassembled into small rings, and a single ring is differentiated into multiple rings. According to changes in the combat process and combat needs, rely on intelligent networking to realize on-the-go splitting, on-the-go deployment, and on-the-go combination of combat forces. In this way, on the one hand, it can enhance the flexibility and adaptability of the combat system; on the other hand, it can also offset the node aggregation effect of complex networks, making it difficult for opponents to find key nodes to defeat one’s own system.

“Mosaic warfare” provides a reference prototype for intelligent warfare. But at the same time, as an idealized force design and application framework, “mosaic warfare” also needs supporting support such as technology, doctrine, and policies that are closely related to it. There is still a long way to go before it can be fully realized. Compared with traditional warfare, The situation of system coexistence will exist for a long time.

● From element integration to system reorganization——

Dynamic structure to enhance the flexibility of the combat system

Structure and relationships often determine functions and properties. “Cyber ​​warfare” and “mosaic warfare” are built on the same material foundation in the information age and follow the same evolutionary paradigm, but the principles and effects of system construction are different. The architecture formed by “cyber warfare” can be statically deconstructed, while “mosaic warfare” dynamically combines functional units according to certain construction rules to form an elastic architecture with self-organizing and adaptive characteristics, similar to a “dynamic black box”. Conventional The means are difficult to track and predict. This flexible structure often “emerges” new capabilities to empower and increase the efficiency of the combat system.

The integrated development of network and cloud makes combat space and time more dynamic and malleable. The Internet and cloud are the basic environment for the operation of the information combat system. They have reshaped the process elements of intelligence, command, attack, and support in traditional operations, and at the same time derived new combat time and space. “Cyber ​​warfare” mainly focuses on the cyberspace, and its combat time and space are relatively static. “Mosaic warfare” is not limited to a single combat space. Under the development trend of information infrastructure network moving with the cloud and integrating cloud and network, the tangible and intangible space can be further hinged, the boundaries of combat space and time are more flexible, and the allocation of combat resources is more flexible. The combat architecture is more dynamic.

Data flows across domains, making combat control more seamlessly coordinated. In the command and control link, “cyber warfare” focuses on the command and control of combat units by joint combat command institutions, and the cross-domain exchange and flow of data is mainly concentrated on theater battlefields. “Mosaic warfare” further lowers the level of joint operations to the tactical end. Through the independent cross-domain exchange and seamless flow of data at the tactical level, various data islands can be gathered into data clusters on demand, thereby generating significant “overflow” “” effect makes the dynamic, discrete, agile, and parallel characteristics of the combat command and control loop more obvious, and is more conducive to realizing agile connection and efficient coordinated actions of various combat units on demand.

The algorithm penetrates all dimensions, making the system run more autonomously and efficiently. Algorithms are the mapping of human consciousness in cyberspace, forming two basic forms: compiled codes transformed by intentions and neural networks transformed by knowledge. In “Cyber ​​Warfare”, compiled code is used extensively and neural networks are only used locally. In the “mosaic war”, the algorithm has expanded to two key functions: shaping rules and providing engines, and the breadth and depth of its application are more prominent. The shaping rules mainly focus on compiled code, supplemented by neural networks, to construct the process framework and operating logic of the “mosaic warfare” system, laying a structural foundation for its uncertainty, adaptability and “emergent” capabilities; providing the engine mainly integrates intelligence The algorithm model is distributed to edge elements for operation, forming a knowledge diffusion effect, thereby comprehensively improving the intelligent autonomous combat capabilities of the “mosaic warfare” system.

The independent release of energy at the edge makes the combat style more flexible and diverse. The edge is an abstract model of various manned/unmanned combat functional units and is also the direct source of the “emergence” of system capabilities. In the “cyber warfare” system, edge elements are closely coupled with the superior and subordinate command and control processes and are in a state of precise control. In the “Mosaic Warfare” system, the perception, interaction, reasoning, and decision-making capabilities of edge elements are greatly improved. Its “OODA” loop does not need to be linked back to the higher-level command organization, which is conducive to supporting the formation of a decentralized combination of high-low and manned/unmanned. The optimized combat cluster form can give edge elements more self-organizing authority, which significantly enhances battlefield confrontation advantages.

It can be seen that if “cyber warfare” is called a sophisticated war machine, “mosaic warfare” can be regarded as a complex “ecology” that can stimulate the dynamic growth of combat capabilities. New technologies generated by network clouds, data, algorithms, and edge devices Changes promote the formation of a dynamic and complex “architecture”. This structure in turn regulates elements, platforms, and systems in reverse, constantly emerging new capabilities, and playing an important role in empowering and evolving the combat system.

● From system breach to compound confrontation——

Analyze the pros and cons and seek effective checks and balances

“Mosaic warfare” represents, to a certain extent, the possible direction for the development of future joint operations. We should fully study and grasp the winning mechanism of “mosaic warfare”, shape the information and communication field as a new domain that breaks the time and space boundaries of traditional wars, create a new concept of cloud-enabled operations, and build a strong defense information infrastructure support capability. Highlight the security and defense capabilities of military information networks, enhance the basic support capabilities for the operation of strategic and campaign command institutions, and continuously improve the network information system.

On the other hand, the emergence of the “mosaic warfare” theory makes it difficult for traditional combat methods to seize and control limited target nodes to achieve the system-breaking effect of destroying points and breaking links. However, it should be noted that any system has its inherent contradictions. Even the seemingly “impeccable” decentralized structure of “mosaic warfare” can still find ways to effectively crack it. For example, grasp the complexity characteristics of the system, use its correlation and dependence, highlight the functional suppression of the communication network, build a network and electricity composite attack path, and achieve the disassembly and isolation of each unit of the combat system; grasp the dissipative characteristics of its structure, Make use of its dependence on external information to highlight the camouflage and misleading of information data, prompting the combat system to transform into abnormal states such as information closure and information overload; grasp its group autonomy characteristics, use its dependence on key technologies to highlight the confrontation against intelligent algorithms Reduce efficiency and inhibit the intelligent driving force of each combat unit; grasp its functional non-linear characteristics, take advantage of its unknown vulnerabilities, highlight differentiated strike assessment on the battlefield, and explore and discover imbalance points in the combat system with higher efficiency and faster speed , looking for key weaknesses in the system to break.

(Author’s unit: Unit 61001)

中國軍事資源:http://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/jmsd/4894888.html

中國人民解放軍聚焦智慧化戰爭

China’s People’s Liberation Army Focusing on Operationalizing Intelligent Warfare

隨著人工智慧在軍事領域的廣泛應用,智慧化戰爭逐漸成為備受矚目的焦點話題。 歷史多次證明,戰爭形態的演進將引發致勝機理的深刻改變。 在資訊化戰爭向縱深發展、智慧化戰爭初露端倪的當今時代,世界主要國家軍隊紛紛下大力推動軍事智慧化,其中的諸多動向值得關注。

加強頂層設計

勾勒智能化戰爭“路線圖”

在新一輪科技革命與產業革命推動下,智慧化軍事變革正向縱深發展。 美國、俄羅斯、日本等國紛紛把人工智慧視為「改變戰爭遊戲規則」的顛覆性技術,並事先佈局,加強頂層設計和規劃引領,探索人工智慧的軍事應用方向。

美軍在《為人工智慧的未來做好準備》《國家人工智慧研究與發展戰略計畫》《人工智慧與國家安全》《2017至2042財年無人係統綜合路線圖》《美國人工智慧計畫》: 在首個年度報告》等文件中,詳述了人工智慧的發展現狀和發展規劃,並將人工智慧發展提升至國家戰略層面。 2021年,美軍在發布的《美國防部人工智慧態勢:評估與改進建議》中指出,美軍發展人工智慧應考慮三個指導性問題:與美軍相關的人工智慧現處於何種狀態;美軍目前 在人工智慧方面的態勢如何;哪些內部行動以及潛在的立法或監管行動可能會增強美軍的人工智慧優勢。

俄羅斯投入大量資源,以維持與美國在人工智慧軍事領域應用競爭的平衡。 2021年,俄總統普丁在年度首場國防部會議上表示,人工智慧將大幅推動軍事領域變革,俄國聯邦武裝力量要加速機器人、智慧單兵系統和武器智慧化模組等人工智慧應用技術的研發 工作,早日形成核心技術能力和戰場競爭優勢。 《2025年前未來軍用機器人技術裝備研發專題綱要》《未來俄軍用機器人應用構想》《人工智慧在軍事領域的發展現狀以及應用前景》等文件,從國家層面為俄軍推動人工智慧軍事應用確立了 一系列機制。

日本政府也推出了《人工智慧戰略》,旨在引領人工智慧技術研發和產業發展。 在英國制定的《機器人與人工智慧》戰略規劃中,強調了人工智慧在戰場建設中的應用。 2021年1月,澳洲國防部發布《打好人工智慧戰爭:未來智慧化戰爭之作戰構想》,這份文件探討如何將人工智慧應用到陸、海、空作戰領域。

創新作戰概念

推動智慧化戰爭“思想先行”

作戰概念創新對軍事科技發展、戰爭形態演變具有思想牽引作用。 過去人們對戰爭的認識與掌握,主要源自於對實務經驗的歸納總結,作戰概念即經驗概念。 未來智慧化戰爭時代,作戰概念不僅是經驗概念,更是對作戰的構想、設計與前瞻。

美陸軍提出「多域戰」概念,要求陸、海、空、天、電磁、網路等各域作戰能力深度整合與密切協同。 為此,美陸軍先後發布《多域戰:21世紀合成兵種的發展(2025至2040)》《美國陸軍多域戰(2028)》《運用機器人與自主技術支援多域戰》等白皮書。 2021年3月,美陸軍部發布文件《陸軍多域轉型:準備在競爭和衝突中取勝》,顯示「多域戰」已成為引領美陸軍轉型發展的一面「旗幟」。 美國防高級研究計畫局提出「馬賽克戰」概念,旨在打造一種由不同作戰功能單元構成的、以先進電腦技術與網路技術為基礎的、高度分散、具有高度適應性的「殺傷網」。 美國防部大力支持「聯合全域作戰」概念。 2020年3月,美空軍率先將「聯合全域作戰」寫入條令,探討空軍如何在「聯合全域作戰」中發揮作用。

俄軍提出「指控瓦解」概念。 「瓦解」是當前俄羅斯最重要的作戰概念之一,俄軍電子戰部隊把使敵人的訊息、指控、電子戰和機器人系統失效作為目標,認為這一目標將「決定所有軍事行動的命運」。 擾亂敵方部隊和武器系統的指揮和控制,降低敵方偵察和使用武器的效率,是進行電子戰的首要任務。 目前,俄軍正在考慮組建12種類型的電子戰部隊。 俄軍也提出「非核遏制體系」概念,核心是使用非核武進攻性戰略武器遏制對手。 其所定義的非核武攻擊性戰略武器既包括所有裝備非核彈頭的彈道飛彈,也包括戰略轟炸機和遠程空基、海基巡航飛彈。 此外,俄軍也提出「混合戰爭」概念,希望利用人工智慧系統謀求戰場資訊優勢。

英國防部提出「多域融合」概念,將發展具備智慧化能力的新型指控系統,以實現全面、持久、準確、快速的戰場感知與力量協同。

注重技術研發

塑造智慧化戰爭作戰模式

人工智慧發揮效用的關鍵是與其他多種技術的組合,這種組合也被描述為「人工智慧堆疊」。 各種技術透過互動的方式產生組合效應,進而提升每項技術所產生的能力與效果。 在人工智慧技術支援的智慧化戰爭中,「人機一體、雲腦控制」的協同作戰模式,「混搭編組、群體智慧」的集群作戰模式,「智慧主導、攻智為上」的認知作戰 模式等,將不斷更新人們對戰爭的認知。

聚焦創新專案研發。 美軍正在大力推廣人工智慧晶片在現有武器裝備系統中的應用,為武器加上“智慧大腦”,使之具備類人思考和自主互動能力。 2021年10月,美海軍推出被視為“當前最高優先事項”的“超越計劃”,旨在通過構建海上作戰軍事物聯網,整合有人無人聯合編隊,加速交付人工智能和機器學習工具,支撐 全新的智慧化海軍架構,提升大規模火力殺傷、實現海軍智慧化分散式作戰。 此外,美國防高級研究計畫局也進行了「自適應電子戰行為學習」「自適應雷達對抗」「極端射頻頻譜條件下的通訊」等認知電子戰項目,研發出認知雷達電子戰系統原型 機。 俄國防部智慧技術裝備科研試驗中心與俄聯邦科學院控制問題研究所合作,開發測試了包括無人機群指揮控制在內的自主智慧演算法,也與國家航空系統科研所共同開發基於神經網路原理的物體 自動辨識軟體系統。

組成創新研發機構。 新技術的不斷湧現是軍事智慧化蓬勃發展的不竭動力,高水準的軍事智慧化建設離不開專職機構的技術研發。 一些國家和軍隊組成研發中心,注重從技術層面創新發展。 美國國防部建立了聯合人工智慧中心,計劃將該中心打造成國家級重點實驗室,用於領導數百個與人工智慧相關的項目,確保對人工智慧相關數據資訊的高效利用,以保持美國 在該領域的技術優勢。 俄羅斯組成了人工智慧和大數據聯盟、國家人工智慧中心和隸屬國防部的機器人技術科研試驗中心,主要進行人工智慧和資訊科技領域的理論和應用研究。 法國成立了創新國防實驗室,英國設立了人工智慧實驗室,印度組成了人工智慧特別工作小組,進行相關技術探索。

加強裝備研發列裝。 近年來,多國重視研發智慧武器裝備,無人飛行器、無人戰車、無人艦艇、無人潛航器等不斷湧現。 目前,美空軍已開始在F-35戰機上實踐「人機協同,人在迴路」的作戰理念。 美XQ-58A「女武神」隱身無人機先前主要與F-35和F-22戰機進行人機協同作戰,2021年4月該隱身無人機成功投放ALTIUS-600小型無人機系統,進一步 提升了其有人無人協同作戰能力。 俄羅斯正聚焦偵察監視、指揮決策、火力打擊、作戰支援等多個領域,展開智慧裝備研發和列裝工作,計畫到2025年將無人作戰系統在武器裝備中的比例提高到30%以上。 以“天王星”系列和“平台-M”“阿爾戈”等型號為代表的俄地面無人作戰武器發展迅速。 其中,Nerekhta無人戰車可搭載遙控機槍和火箭發射器,除擁有一般裝甲車的戰鬥力外,還兼具運輸和偵察功能。 此外,日本自衛隊計劃在2035年正式部署具有較強作戰能力的無人空中編隊。

現代英語:

With the widespread application of artificial intelligence in the military field, intelligent warfare has gradually become a hot topic. History has proven many times that the evolution of war patterns will trigger profound changes in the winning mechanism. In today’s era when information warfare is developing in depth and intelligent warfare is beginning to emerge, the militaries of major countries in the world have vigorously promoted military intelligence, and many of these trends deserve attention.

 Strengthen top-level design

 Outline a “roadmap” for intelligent warfare

 Driven by a new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial revolution, intelligent military transformation is developing in depth. The United States, Russia, Japan and other countries have regarded artificial intelligence as a disruptive technology that “changes the rules of the war game” and have made arrangements in advance, strengthened top-level design and planning guidance, and explored the direction of military application of artificial intelligence.

 In “Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence”, “National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan”, “Artificial Intelligence and National Security”, “Comprehensive Roadmap for Unmanned Systems from Fiscal Years 2017 to 2042” and “U.S. Artificial Intelligence Plan”: “First Annual Report” and other documents detail the development status and development plans of artificial intelligence, and elevate the development of artificial intelligence to the national strategic level. In 2021, the U.S. military pointed out in its “U.S. Department of Defense Artificial Intelligence Situation: Assessment and Improvement Suggestions” that the U.S. military should consider three guiding questions when developing artificial intelligence: What is the current status of artificial intelligence related to the U.S. military; What is the posture regarding artificial intelligence; what internal actions and potential legislative or regulatory actions may enhance the U.S. military’s artificial intelligence advantage. 

Russia has invested a lot of resources in order to maintain a balance with the United States in the competition with the United States in the military application of artificial intelligence. In 2021, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated at the first Ministry of Defense meeting of the year that artificial intelligence will greatly promote changes in the military field, and the Russian Federation’s armed forces must accelerate the research and development of artificial intelligence application technologies such as robots, intelligent individual soldier systems, and weapon intelligent modules. work to form core technical capabilities and battlefield competitive advantages as soon as possible. Documents such as the “Special Outline for the Research and Development of Future Military Robot Technology and Equipment by 2025”, “Future Russian Military Robot Application Concept”, “The Development Status and Application Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in the Military Field” have established the national level for the Russian military to promote the military application of artificial intelligence. A series of mechanisms.

 The Japanese government has also introduced the Artificial Intelligence Strategy, aiming to lead the research and development of artificial intelligence technology and industrial development. In the “Robotics and Artificial Intelligence” strategic plan formulated by the United Kingdom, the application of artificial intelligence in battlefield construction is emphasized. In January 2021, the Australian Department of Defense released “Fighting Artificial Intelligence Warfare: Operational Concepts for Future Intelligent Warfare.” This document explores how to apply artificial intelligence to land, sea, and air combat fields.

 innovative operational concepts

 Promote intelligent warfare with “ideas first”

 The innovation of operational concepts has an ideological pulling effect on the development of military science and technology and the evolution of war forms. In the past, people’s understanding and understanding of war mainly came from the summary of practical experience. The concept of combat is the concept of experience. In the future era of intelligent warfare, the concept of combat is not only an empirical concept, but also the conception, design and foresight of combat.

 The U.S. Army has proposed the concept of “multi-domain warfare”, which requires deep integration and close coordination of combat capabilities in land, sea, air, space, electromagnetic, network and other domains. To this end, the U.S. Army has successively released white papers such as “Multi-Domain Warfare: The Development of Combined Arms in the 21st Century (2025-2040)”, “U.S. Army Multi-Domain Warfare (2028)” and “Using Robots and Autonomous Technology to Support Multi-Domain Warfare”. In March 2021, the U.S. Department of the Army released the document “Army Multi-Domain Transformation: Preparing to Win in Competition and Conflict”, indicating that “multi-domain warfare” has become a “flag” leading the transformation and development of the U.S. Army. The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency proposed the concept of “mosaic warfare”, aiming to create a highly decentralized and highly adaptable “kill network” composed of different combat functional units and based on advanced computer technology and network technology. The U.S. Department of Defense strongly supports the concept of “joint all-domain operations.” In March 2020, the U.S. Air Force took the lead in writing “Joint All-Domain Operations” into its doctrine to explore how the Air Force can play a role in “Joint All-Domain Operations.”

 The Russian army proposed the concept of “charge disintegration”. “Disintegration” is currently one of the most important operational concepts in Russia. The Russian electronic warfare force sets the goal of disabling the enemy’s information, command, electronic warfare and robotic systems, believing that this goal will “determine the fate of all military operations.” Disrupting the command and control of enemy forces and weapon systems and reducing the efficiency of enemy reconnaissance and weapons use are the primary tasks of electronic warfare. Currently, the Russian army is considering forming 12 types of electronic warfare units. The Russian military also proposed the concept of a “non-nuclear containment system”, the core of which is to use non-nuclear offensive strategic weapons to contain opponents. The non-nuclear offensive strategic weapons defined by it include all ballistic missiles equipped with non-nuclear warheads, as well as strategic bombers and long-range air-based and sea-based cruise missiles. In addition, the Russian military has also proposed the concept of “hybrid warfare”, hoping to use artificial intelligence systems to seek battlefield information advantages.

 The British Ministry of Defense has proposed the concept of “multi-domain integration” and will develop a new command and control system with intelligent capabilities to achieve comprehensive, durable, accurate and rapid battlefield perception and force coordination.

 Focus on technology research and development

 Shape intelligent warfare operations model

 The key to AI’s effectiveness is its combination with a variety of other technologies, also described as the “AI stack.” Various technologies interact to create a combined effect, thereby enhancing the capabilities and effects of each technology. In intelligent warfare supported by artificial intelligence technology, the collaborative combat mode of “man-machine integration, cloud brain control”, the cluster combat mode of “mixed grouping, swarm intelligence”, and the cognitive warfare of “intelligence-led, intelligence-based attack first” models, etc., will continue to update people’s understanding of war.

 Focus on the research and development of innovative projects. The US military is vigorously promoting the application of artificial intelligence chips in existing weapons and equipment systems, adding “intelligent brains” to weapons to enable them to have human-like thinking and autonomous interaction capabilities. In October 2021, the US Navy launched the “Beyond Plan”, which is regarded as the “current highest priority”. It aims to build a maritime combat military Internet of Things, integrate manned and unmanned joint formations, accelerate the delivery of artificial intelligence and machine learning tools, and support The new intelligent naval architecture improves large-scale firepower destruction and realizes intelligent distributed naval operations. In addition, the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has also carried out cognitive electronic warfare projects such as “Adaptive Electronic Warfare Behavior Learning”, “Adaptive Radar Countermeasures” and “Communication under Extreme Radio Frequency Spectrum Conditions”, and developed a cognitive radar electronic warfare system prototype. machine. The Russian Ministry of Defense’s Intelligent Technology and Equipment Scientific Research and Testing Center cooperated with the Institute of Control Problems of the Russian Federal Academy of Sciences to develop and test autonomous intelligent algorithms including the command and control of UAV groups. It also jointly developed objects based on neural network principles with the National Aviation Systems Research Institute. Automatic recognition software system.

 Establish innovative R&D institutions. The continuous emergence of new technologies is an inexhaustible driving force for the vigorous development of military intelligence. High-level military intelligence construction is inseparable from the technical research and development of specialized institutions. Some countries and militaries have established R&D centers to focus on innovation and development at the technical level. The U.S. Department of Defense has established a Joint Artificial Intelligence Center and plans to build the center into a national key laboratory to lead hundreds of artificial intelligence-related projects and ensure the efficient use of artificial intelligence-related data and information to maintain the U.S. technical advantages in this field. Russia has established the Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Alliance, the National Artificial Intelligence Center, and the Robotics Research and Test Center under the Ministry of Defense to mainly carry out theoretical and applied research in the fields of artificial intelligence and information technology. France has established an innovative defense laboratory, the United Kingdom has established an artificial intelligence laboratory, and India has established an artificial intelligence task force to explore related technologies.

 Strengthen equipment research and development and installation. In recent years, many countries have attached great importance to the research and development of intelligent weapons and equipment, and unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned combat vehicles, unmanned ships, unmanned submarines, etc. have continued to emerge. Currently, the U.S. Air Force has begun to practice the combat concept of “man-machine collaboration, man-in-the-loop” on the F-35 fighter jets. The US XQ-58A “Valkyrie” stealth drone previously mainly conducted man-machine collaborative operations with F-35 and F-22 fighters. In April 2021, the stealth drone was successfully launched into the ALTIUS-600 small drone system, further Improved its manned and unmanned collaborative combat capabilities. Russia is focusing on reconnaissance and surveillance, command and decision-making, fire strikes, combat support and other fields to develop and field intelligent equipment. It plans to increase the proportion of unmanned combat systems in weapons and equipment to more than 30% by 2025. Russian ground unmanned combat weapons, represented by the “Uranus” series and “Platform-M” and “Argo” models, have developed rapidly. Among them, the Nerekhta unmanned combat vehicle can be equipped with remote-controlled machine guns and rocket launchers. In addition to having the combat effectiveness of ordinary armored vehicles, it also has transportation and reconnaissance functions. In addition, the Japan Self-Defense Force plans to formally deploy unmanned aerial formations with strong combat capabilities in 2035.

http://www.mod.gov.cn/888/沒有湯給你