Chinese Military Reflections on the Application of AI in Human-Machine Integrated Combat

中國軍方對人工智慧在人機一體化作戰中應用的思考

現代英語:

The principle of training troops to fight future battles is a fundamental tenet of military strategy throughout history. An army that does not study and predict warfare is a foolish army, destined to fail when war strikes.

To date, there have been four major military transformations in the world: the first was the shift from primarily using wooden and stone weapons to primarily using metal weapons; the second was the shift from primarily using cold weapons (metal weapons) to primarily using firearms (gunpowder weapons); the third was the shift from firearms to mechanized weapons; and the fourth occurred after the 1990 Gulf War, when warfare shifted from primarily using mechanized weapons to primarily using precision-guided weapons, driving the transformation of military development from mechanization to informatization.

The fourth military revolution, also known as the new military revolution by academics, involves the world’s major military powers engaging in comprehensive competition in areas such as information technology, network technology, precision-guided technology, aerospace technology, new energy technology, biotechnology, and stealth technology. This competition has now culminated in the pursuit of advantages in big data, cloud computing, and intelligent robots, aiming to create real-life versions of “Iron Man,” “Batman,” and “Terminator.” The revolution is actively promoting the transformation of military construction from informatization and networking to intelligentization and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) deployment. The military is developing towards a lean, small, efficient, intelligent, and integrated “human-machine (robot/UAV)” model, seeking to enable robot soldiers, UAVs, and human soldiers to fight together.

According to statistics, the militaries of more than 60 countries worldwide have already equipped themselves with military robots, encompassing over 150 different types. It is projected that by 2040, half of the world’s major military powers may be comprised of robots. In addition to the US, Russia, the UK, France, Japan, Israel, Turkey, and Iran, which have already launched their own robot warriors and drones, other countries are also investing in the research and development of unmanned weapons, which will inevitably give rise to unmanned combat forces.

The term “unmanned combat force” is a general term for combat robots or battlefield killing robot systems. With the development of various information-based, precision-based, and data-driven weapons and equipment, intelligent platforms have become the driving force for pre-designed battlefields, combat robots have become the main force on the battlefield, and the combination of “human and machine” confrontation has become the key to defeating the enemy. In the future, the battlefield space forces will highlight the development trend of three-dimensional unmanned operation and human-machine integration across land, sea, and air.

In combat command and control, AI can automatically and rapidly generate combat plans. War is fought, but it is also designed. With the emergence of various information-based, precision, and intelligent weapons and equipment, and the widespread application of artificial intelligence, big data, and 5G networks, the future battlefield will essentially achieve integrated “human-machine” collaborative combat, inevitably revolutionizing traditional combat methods. Intelligent platforms, leveraging the advantages of big data, will become the behind-the-scenes directors of pre-designed battlefields, providing more accurate predictions and technical parameters, making future battlefield design more precise and efficient. Using AI technology, by inputting elements such as the deployment of enemy and friendly forces, equipment performance, personnel numbers, and battlefield environment into the combat command information system template, AI-based combat plans can be quickly generated for commanders’ operational decision-making. If commanders feel something is amiss and want to fight a battle they are confident of winning, they can also use intelligent simulated combat laboratories, employing artificial intelligence, big data, 5G networks, and simulation equipment and materials, to simulate the technical performance of enemy and friendly weapons and equipment, battlefield conditions, personnel quality, and combat actions, to test and refine the scientific and rational nature of the war design scheme, striving to find the optimal combat plan. 5G’s massive machine-to-machine communication capabilities can be combined with artificial intelligence to accelerate the comprehensive analysis and systematic research of combat effectiveness elements and combat processes using new intelligent algorithms, and to quickly derive combat capability assessment indices. This provides technical means for the large-scale use of unmanned weapons.

AI-generated combat plans differ from traditional automated combat command systems, though they share some similarities, they also have fundamental differences. In a sense, both are automated systems, but combat command automation, by inputting various combat elements, aims to output combat command decisions—these are essentially fixed. AI-generated combat plans, however, are different. The input combat elements can be fixed or variable, but the output is invariably unpredictable, almost entirely unpredictable. For example, even with the same total number of elements and parameters, different input orders will generate different results, potentially producing unexpected outcomes—this is the essence of artificial intelligence.

In terms of surprise in warfare, the coordinated operations of drones or manned aircraft have ushered in a new era. Night warfare, whether in the past or modern, has been a more effective way to achieve tactical and operational surprise. Today, night warfare is even more favored by informationized and intelligent armies. At night and in the early morning, people are in a state of sleep or semi-awakeness, and are relatively tired or complacent. Therefore, launching a war at this time makes it easier to achieve surprise. In the Kosovo War, the US launched its airstrikes at 8 PM. In the Afghan War, the US launched its airstrikes late at night. In the Iraq War, after launching its airstrikes at 5:36 AM, the US extensively used various means, including space reconnaissance satellites, aerial reconnaissance aircraft, and ground reconnaissance, to build a comprehensive information reconnaissance network system covering the air, space, and ground, firmly controlling “information superiority” and ensuring the smooth conduct of air strikes and nighttime ground military operations. With the development of night vision equipment and the increasing sophistication of night warfare methods, night and early morning have become common means of achieving surprise in air strikes. Seizing the favorable opportunities of darkness and early morning to launch surprise air strikes is the spark that will ignite future wars. Before the outbreak of future wars, unmanned reconnaissance aircraft will cooperate with manned high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft and space satellites to conduct reconnaissance of enemy forward and deep-space targets. In particular, once a drone detects a target, it can quickly transmit image information such as the target’s location and size to its own command center, drone operator, or manned aircraft pilot for decision-making reference and to issue long-range strike orders. During the Gulf War, multinational forces deployed drones to conduct day and night reconnaissance over Iraqi front-line positions, providing real-time images and guiding ground troops to destroy Iraqi positions. During the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan last year, Armenian media released a video showing the Armenian army using the Seahawk-10 drone to guide ground artillery attacks on Azerbaijani infantry units. In the video, the Armenian army’s Seahawk-10 drone transmitted information about a group of soldiers advancing in skirmish lines detected at high altitude to the drone operator. After several zoom-in confirmations, the drone operator used the drone to collect data on the target and transmit it to the artillery at the rear. After receiving the target coordinates, the Armenian artillery first conducted multiple single-shot test firings. The Seahawk-10 UAV then conducted real-time assessments of the test firing results in the air and promptly adjusted the target coordinate parameters to transmit to the Armenian artillery for concentrated and precise firing.

In future wars, drones are poised to replace conventional fighter jets, becoming one of the mainstays of aerial warfare. Their ability to execute precise, real-time strikes will revolutionize the traditional manned aircraft-based surprise attack methods employed in the dark or early morning. Currently, the UK is developing a new high-tech unmanned stealth fighter with stealth capabilities. It can test and drop munitions over multiple targets and defend itself against attacks from other manned and unmanned aircraft. Even without ground command, it can communicate with command centers via satellite and operate autonomously, executing precision strikes against long-range targets. Thus, drones, as a rapidly emerging force, have evolved from “reconnaissance and support” to “offensive protagonists.” They not only effectively supplement satellite reconnaissance but also perform diverse combat missions such as long-range reconnaissance, border patrol, target identification, electromagnetic interference, supply delivery, precision strikes, autonomous strikes, integrated reconnaissance and strike operations, and damage assessment. They are destined to become the vanguard in future wars.

On the land battlefield, unmanned tanks, unmanned armored vehicles, and combat robots are charging to the front lines, forming mixed formations with ground soldiers to fight collaboratively. To execute battlefield missions more efficiently and reduce casualties, future battlefields may see a large number of unmanned vehicles such as tanks, armored vehicles, and logistics transport vehicles. Leveraging the high speed, low latency, and interconnectivity of 5G networks, these vehicles can autonomously traverse various complex terrains and obstacles without human intervention, making instantaneous decisions to effectively ensure safety and reliability. Land robots can not only perform offensive and defensive combat missions but also deliver ammunition, medical supplies, and food, conduct patrols, and carry out reconnaissance and surveillance. Unmanned tanks allow soldiers to remotely control them, automatically load ammunition, and autonomously conduct indirect precision strikes. In 2019, Russia tested a robotic system called “Wooden Boat” to unify the command of several military robots. The Russian military and robotics research institutions also conducted collaborative exercises with newly developed combat robots, achieving good results and summarizing training methods in practice. According to Russian media reports, Russia is preparing to establish a combat robot force, a completely new type of military unit. These robots can achieve maximum automation, requiring minimal human intervention and essentially completing battlefield combat missions independently. Russian military-industrial complexes will begin developing the “Comrade” and “Assault” robot systems, composed of medium and heavy robots respectively, starting in 2020. They are currently working to improve the performance of some robots to better enable them to perform tasks in urban and coastal environments. In August 2015, on the Syrian battlefield, in addition to deploying traditional combat forces, the Russian military deployed for the first time a fully-fledged robot combat company, primarily composed of unmanned combat platforms, to conduct positional assault operations. Employing a new combat model of mixed manned and unmanned formations, they captured a high ground that Russian soldiers would find difficult to conquer in just 20 minutes, achieving a victory with zero casualties and 77 enemy kills. On April 21, 2018, the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) special forces launched a raid against extremist terrorist groups, publicly deploying armed unmanned combat vehicles equipped with machine guns as the vanguard for the first time. Following large-scale testing of combat robots at an event called “Autonomous Warrior 2018,” the British Army has unified drones, unmanned vehicles, and combat personnel as a common practice for world-class militaries in the coming decades. The US Army, having formally established unmanned platoons, plans to form unmanned combat brigades and has already developed a standardized set of hardware and software. Once installed on vehicles, these can be remotely controlled, even semi-autonomously, automatically following predetermined routes or choosing the smoothest, most direct path, or driven by a human driver. One emerging project, the “optional manned tank,” aims to propel the Army into a new generation of joint operations. It may be capable of firing lasers, controlling drones, high-speed maneuvering, destroying enemy helicopters, penetrating enemy armored formations, and performing highly lethal robotic combat missions against enemy fire. The US Army has also made rapid progress in manned-unmanned combined arms operations. This means that robotic systems will increasingly operate with greater autonomy, while still being commanded and controlled by human decision-makers. Robotic vehicles deployed at the front lines can directly attack enemy mechanized formations at close range, launch weapons, perform high-risk surveillance missions, and deliver munitions when necessary. The U.S. Marine Corps tested its unmanned combat vehicle, nicknamed “Hunter Wolf,” in Arizona. Equipped with a 30mm M230LF “short-barreled” chain gun, the vehicle conducted a rapid-fire live-fire demonstration, achieving a perfect 6-for-6 hit. The “Hunter Wolf” is 2.3 meters long, 1.4 meters wide, and 1.17 meters high, weighing only 1.1 tons, yet capable of carrying a 450-kilogram modular combat payload. It uses a hybrid electric system, offering a maximum range of 100 kilometers without refueling, a top speed of 32 kilometers per hour, a maximum endurance of 72 hours, and the ability to climb slopes with a gradient of 30 degrees.

In the naval battlefield, unmanned ghost fleets, composed of unmanned surface and underwater vessels, are mixed with manned fleets and operate in coordinated formations. Since the 1990s, the increasing application of artificial intelligence and big data in the military field has ushered in a true golden age for unmanned surface and underwater vessels, giving rise to underwater robots (AUVs) and surface robots (ASVs). Various unmanned submarines and unmanned underwater vehicles perform a variety of tasks such as underwater search, reconnaissance, and mine clearance. Unmanned warships can travel thousands of miles and perform various maritime combat missions without onboard personnel. After the Iraq War in 2003, countries around the world saw the great potential and broad prospects of unmanned marine systems, which also reduce manpower and improve combat effectiveness, thus initiating a competition to build unmanned ghost fleets. Israel, as a country that places particular emphasis on reducing soldier casualties, took the lead in launching the development of modern “Protector” unmanned surface vessels, which are used to patrol the Lebanese coast and monitor Hezbollah activities and deployments. France and Russia already possess manned submersible research vessels capable of diving to depths of 6,000 meters. Japan has proposed a concept for the “Shinkai 12000,” a new manned submersible research vessel capable of diving to the world’s deepest point. Following its “Future Maritime Aviation Acceleration Day” event, the UK continues to develop a “plug-and-play” autonomous maritime platform development system. This system, once integrated into Royal Navy vessels, will simplify the acquisition and use of automation and unmanned technologies.

In the aerial battlefield, drones and manned aircraft are mixed in formation and cooperate in combat. In 2019, approximately 30 countries worldwide had developed over 50 types of drones, and more than 50 countries had deployed drones. The main types include: cryptographic drones, multi-functional drones, AI-powered drones, long-endurance drones, anti-missile drones, early warning drones, stealth drones, micro drones, air combat drones, mapping drones, aerial photography drones, armed drones, and drone wingmen. With the widespread application of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence and big data in the military field, the performance of equipment on drones is constantly improving. They will integrate multiple functions such as reconnaissance, fire correction, surveillance, battle result assessment, target identification, attack guidance, radio relay, and ground attack. They can conduct electronic jamming and deception at long distances from the enemy, and can also autonomously attack important ground targets when necessary. The future aerial battlefield will essentially realize unmanned or human-machine (drone) cooperative air strikes, or autonomous drone air strikes, which will inevitably revolutionize traditional air combat methods. In the future, fighter pilots will control unmanned attack aircraft or bombers from their cockpits to evade enemy air defense systems, while offensive forces will receive real-time intelligence data more quickly—all thanks to the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence technology. In future air strikes, swarms of drones will swarm in, using sophisticated instruments for detection, reconnaissance, and counter-reconnaissance. Once they lock onto targets, they will calmly launch missiles, possessing integrated reconnaissance and strike capabilities, autonomous attack, and human-machine collaborative strike capabilities. The Russian Aerospace Forces will equip themselves with heavy attack drones capable of maneuvering around enemy air defense systems without command, autonomously searching for and striking the most important targets, and then retreating safely back to base. This aircraft will be equipped with artificial intelligence components and can be remotely controlled by Su-57 fighter jets. According to RIA Novosti, the Russian S-70 “Hunter” heavy attack drone can attack targets according to instructions issued from Su-57 stealth fighter jets. Currently, the control station where the “Hunter” ground operators are located is equipped with joysticks, keyboards, and several multi-function LCD screens, similar to those used in manned fighter jets. These screens display various information transmitted from the “Hunter’s” onboard systems and sensors. In the near future, this ground-based remote control equipment may achieve full automation. The S-70 “Hunter” UAV, developed by the Sukhoi Design Bureau, is designed and manufactured based on a flying wing aerodynamic layout. According to public information, the “Hunter” is 14 meters long, has a wingspan of 19 meters, and a takeoff weight of 20 tons. The “Hunter” has a maximum speed of 1000 kilometers per hour and uses stealth materials to reduce its radar cross-section (detection signal). The “Hunter’s” first flight was on August 3, 2019. Reportedly, as part of the flight test program, the first prototype of the “Hunter” has begun weapons testing: including test flights with a functional simulator carrying air-to-air missiles, and bombing ground targets at the Ashuluk test range. Currently, the Novosibirsk Chkalov Aircraft Plant is building three more “Hunter” UAV prototypes. Russia has completed combat formation flights of its multi-role fifth-generation Su-57 fighter jets and heavy “Hunter” reconnaissance and combat drones. These drones will be organized into multiple air regiments, likely joining Su-57 air regiments. The plan is for 2-3 Su-57 squadrons to each have a drone squadron, operating together and employing new strategies and artificial intelligence elements. The UK also plans to enable a single manned aircraft to simultaneously command five drones, while France plans to achieve mixed formation operations of Rafale fighter jets and Neuron drones.

The use of drones for military reconnaissance began in the 1960s and has been widely applied in various wars. During the Vietnam War, the US military deployed over 3,000 drone sorties for reconnaissance, with over 1,000 failing to return safely and disappearing without a trace. In the Gulf War, multinational forces deployed drones day and night to reconnoiter Iraqi frontline positions, providing real-time imagery and guiding ground troops to destroy Iraqi positions. In the Bosnian War, the US military used Predator drones to monitor the withdrawal of Serbian heavy weapons from Sarajevo and provided a wealth of target data for aircraft participating in airstrikes. In the Kosovo War, the US military deployed over 100 drones for battlefield reconnaissance and surveillance, contributing significantly to the 78-day air campaign. In the US operations against the Taliban, the US military used unmanned attack aircraft, carrying weapons, for the first time in actual combat. On September 14, 2019, after an attack on a Saudi Aramco oil company’s “world’s largest oil processing facility” and oil field, the Houthi rebels in Yemen claimed responsibility, stating they used 10 drones to attack the facility. On January 3, 2020, Qassem Soleimani, commander of the Quds Force of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, was killed in a US drone strike on Baghdad International Airport in the early morning. In late 2020, drones played a significant role in the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan in Nagorno-Karabakh. Many military experts were particularly impressed by the videos released by the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense showing TB-2 “Standard” drones, recently purchased from Turkey, and Harop suicide drones, purchased from Israel, attacking Armenian armored vehicles, artillery, cars, and even infantry positions. While the videos clearly show the targets destroyed by the drones, the visual impact of the attacks was undeniably striking. The localized conflicts that occurred in the Middle East and the South Caucasus last December demonstrate the growing role of drones. No wonder some military strategists have even predicted that the 21st century will be the “golden age” for drone development, with drones inevitably replacing manned fighter jets and becoming the “protagonists of the battlefield” in the 21st century.

It can be predicted that future wars will inevitably see unmanned land, sea and air weapons replacing soldiers in performing high-risk missions, and the future battlefield will inevitably be a joint operation combining “human” and “machine”.

Combat-driven training means building an army based on how battles are fought. Future military equipment, whether tanks, robots, or drones, will likely take many forms. Future military personnel must be proficient in intelligent technologies, big data applications, and cloud computing, and master the programming methods for controlling intelligent robots and drones. The future army will inevitably be a “human-machine” integrated force, establishing “human-machine” integrated platoons, companies, combat simulation centers, adversary units, special forces, intelligent command headquarters, and unmanned battalions, regiments, and brigades. At that time, military commanders may have one human and one robot as assistants or deputies. Platoon and company commanders will gradually be replaced by robots, and robots will gradually transition from human control to autonomous decision-making or mind control via human brain cells. As early as the 2014 Brazil World Cup, a paralyzed teenager wearing a “mechanical exoskeleton armor” kicked the first ball through mind control. Today, the technology of mind control over objects or experimental animals is becoming increasingly sophisticated.

In future warfare, it will become possible for a small number of soldiers to lead a massive swarm of unmanned robots, such as bees, ants, or schools of fish, to carry out combat missions. Through thought-based group control, soldiers’ mission comprehension and battlefield control capabilities can be greatly enhanced, enabling efficient identification of friend or foe, remote real-time command, intelligent mission planning, and efficient autonomous collaboration. The Russian Foundation for Future Research states that they have mastered brain-computer interface technology for controlling machines through thought. Previously, British researchers developed a brain-computer interface device for controlling a spacecraft simulator; when worn on a test subject, it successfully controlled the flight of a model spacecraft. However, there is still a long way to go before soldiers can effectively control complex unmanned combat swarms using this technology. Military camps may also see further changes. Troop management may involve one or a few military commanders leading teams of multiple or even dozens of intelligent robots with different tasks to complete tasks previously performed manually. Alternatively, military training may involve a single military commander in a command and control center, using video to control all intelligent robots in the training field for adversarial training, or remotely controlling robot commanders to issue new training instructions, adjust mission deployments, and change training grounds in real time.

現代國語:

000

訓練軍隊應對未來戰爭的原則是軍事戰略縱觀歷史的根本信條。一支不研究和預測戰爭的軍隊是愚蠢的軍隊,注定在戰爭爆發時失敗。 迄今為止,世界經歷了四次重大軍事變革:第一次是從主要使用木製和石製武器轉向主要使用金屬武器;第二次是從主要使用冷兵器(金屬武器)轉向主要使用火器(火藥武器);第三次是從火器轉向機械化武器;第四次發生在1990年海灣戰爭之後,戰爭從主要使用機械化武器化為使用機械化武器轉型,從主要使用機械化武器轉型為機械化武器化從主要使用機械化武器到了主要使用機械化武器轉型,從主要使用機械化武器化向武器化,從主要使用機械化武器轉變為從主要使用機械化武器轉型,從主要使用機械化武器轉向了主要使用機械化武器轉變為主要使用機械化武器。 第四次軍事革命,也被學術界稱為新軍事革命,指的是世界主要軍事強國在資訊科技、網路技術、精確導引技術、航空航天技術、新能源技術、生物技術和隱身技術等領域展開全面競爭。這場競爭如今已演變為對大數據、雲端運算和智慧機器人領域優勢的爭奪,旨在打造現實版的「鋼鐵人」、「蝙蝠俠」和「終結者」。這場革命正積極推動軍事建設從資訊化和網路化向智慧化和無人機(UAV)部署轉型。軍隊正朝著精簡、小型化、高效化、智慧化和一體化的「人機(機器人/無人機)」模式發展,力求實現機器人士兵、無人機和人類士兵的協同作戰。 根據統計,全球已有超過60個國家的軍隊裝備了軍用機器人,涵蓋150多種不同類型。預計到2040年,世界主要軍事強國中將有一半以上由機器人組成。除了美國、俄羅斯、英國、法國、日本、以色列、土耳其和伊朗等已推出各自機器人戰士和無人機的國家外,其他國家也在加大對無人武器研發的投入,這必將催生無人作戰力量。 「無人作戰力量」一詞是對作戰機器人或戰場殺傷機器人系統的統稱。隨著各種資訊化、精確化和數據驅動型武器裝備的發展,智慧平台已成為預先設計戰場的驅動力,作戰機器人已成為戰場上的主力,而「人機」結合的對抗已成為擊敗敵人的關鍵。未來,戰場空間力量的發展趨勢將凸顯陸海空三維無人作戰與人機融合的趨勢。 在作戰指揮控制方面,人工智慧可以自動、快速地產生作戰計畫。戰爭既是打仗,也是設計。隨著各種資訊化、精確化、智慧化武器裝備的出現,以及人工智慧、大數據和5G網路的廣泛應用,未來戰場將基本實現「人機」協同作戰,勢必革新傳統作戰方式。智慧平台將利用大數據優勢,成為預先設計戰場的幕後指揮者,提供更精準的預測和技術參數,使未來戰場設計更加精準高效。利用人工智慧技術,將敵我兵力部署、裝備性能、人員數量、戰場環境等要素輸入作戰指揮資訊系統模板,即可快速產生基於人工智慧的作戰計劃,供指揮官進行作戰決策。如果指揮官感覺情況不對勁,想要打一場有把握取勝的仗,他們還可以利用智能模擬作戰實驗室,運用人工智能、大數據、5G網絡以及模擬設備和材料,模擬敵我武器裝備的技術性能、戰場環境、人員素質和作戰行動,檢驗和完善作戰設計方案的科學性和合理性,力求找到最優作戰計劃。 5G海量的機器間通訊能力可以與人工智慧結合,利用新的智慧演算法加速對作戰效能要素和作戰過程進行綜合分析和系統研究,並快速得出作戰能力評估指標。這為無人武器的大規模應用提供了技術手段。 儘管人工智慧產生的作戰計畫與傳統的自動化作戰指揮系統有所不同,但呃,它們之間有一些相似之處,但也存在根本性的差異。從某種意義上說,兩者都是自動化系統,但作戰指揮自動化透過輸入各種作戰要素,旨在輸出作戰指揮決策——這些決策本質上是固定的。然而,人工智慧產生的作戰計畫則不同。輸入的作戰要素可以是固定的,也可以是可變的,但輸出總是不可預測的,幾乎完全不可預測。例如,即使要素和參數的總數相同,不同的輸入指令也會產生不同的結果,甚至可能產生意想不到的後果——這正是人工智慧的本質。

就戰爭的奇襲性而言,無人機或有人駕駛飛機的協同作戰開啟了一個新時代。無論過去或現在,夜戰都是實現戰術和作戰奇襲的更有效方式。如今,資訊化和智慧化的軍隊更加青睞夜戰。在夜間和清晨,人們處於睡眠或半清醒狀態,相對疲倦或麻痺大意。因此,此時發動戰爭更容易取得奇襲效果。在科索沃戰爭中,美國於晚上8點發動空襲;在阿富汗戰爭中,美國於深夜發動空襲;在伊拉克戰爭中,美國於凌晨5點36分發動空襲後,廣泛運用包括太空偵察衛星、空中偵察機和地面偵察在內的各種手段,構建覆蓋空中、太空和地面的綜合信息偵察網絡系統,牢牢掌握“信息優勢”,確保空襲和夜間地面軍事行動的順利進行。隨著夜視裝備的發展和夜戰手段的日益精進,夜間和清晨已成為空襲取得奇襲效果的常用手段。抓住夜幕和清晨的有利時機發動突襲,將成為未來戰爭的導火線。在未來戰爭爆發前,無人偵察機將與有人駕駛高空偵察機和太空衛星協同作戰,對敵方前線目標和深空目標進行偵察。特別是,一旦無人機發現目標,便可迅速將目標的位置和大小等影像資訊傳輸至己方指揮中心、無人機操作員或有人駕駛飛機飛行員,供其決策參考並下達遠端打擊指令。在海灣戰爭期間,多國部隊部署無人機對伊拉克前線陣地進行晝夜偵察,提供即時影像並引導地面部隊摧毀伊拉克陣地。去年亞美尼亞和阿塞拜疆衝突期間,亞美尼亞媒體發布了一段視頻,顯示亞美尼亞軍隊使用“海鷹-10”無人機引導地面砲兵對阿塞拜疆步兵部隊進行攻擊。影片中,亞美尼亞軍隊的「海鷹-10」無人機將高空偵測到的正在散兵線上推進的士兵群的訊息傳輸給了無人機操作員。經過多次放大確認後,無人機操作員利用無人機收集目標數據並將其傳輸至後方砲兵部隊。亞美尼亞砲兵部隊收到目標座標後,先進行了多次單發試射。隨後,海鷹-10無人機對試射結果進行空中即時評估,並迅速調整目標座標參數,將其傳輸至亞美尼亞砲兵部隊,以便進行集中精確射擊。

在未來的戰爭中,無人機有望取代傳統戰鬥機,成為空中作戰的主力之一。它們執行精確即時打擊的能力將徹底改變傳統的有人駕駛飛機在夜間或清晨進行的突襲方式。目前,英國正在研發一種新型高科技隱形無人戰鬥機,該戰鬥機具備隱身能力。它可以對多個目標進行彈藥測試和投放,並能防禦來自其他有人駕駛和無人駕駛飛機的攻擊。即使沒有地面指揮,它也能透過衛星與指揮中心通信,自主作戰,精確打擊遠程目標。因此,無人機作為一股迅速崛起的力量,已從「偵察支援」發展成為「進攻主力」。它們不僅能有效補充衛星偵察,還能執行多種作戰任務,例如遠程偵察、邊境巡邏、目標識別、電磁幹擾、物資補給、精確打擊、自主打擊、偵察打擊一體化作戰以及損毀評估。它們注定將成為未來戰爭的先鋒。

在陸戰場上,無人坦克、無人裝甲車和作戰機器人正衝鋒陷陣,與地面部隊組成混合編隊。為了更有效率地執行戰場任務並減少傷亡,未來的戰場上可能會出現大量無人車輛,例如坦克、裝甲車和後勤運輸車。借助5G網路的高速、低延遲和互聯互通特性,這些車輛無需人工幹預即可自主穿越各種複雜地形和障礙物,並能瞬間做出決策,從而有效確保安全性和可靠性。陸地機器人不僅可以執行進攻和防禦作戰任務,還可以運送彈藥、醫療用品和食品,進行巡邏以及執行偵察監視任務。無人坦克允許士兵遠端操控,自動裝填彈藥,並自主進行間接精確打擊。 2019年,俄羅斯測試了一套名為「木船」的機器人系統,用於統一指揮多個軍用機器人。俄羅斯軍事和機器人研究機構也利用新開發的作戰機器人進行了協同演習,取得了良好的成果,並總結了實踐中的訓練方法。根據俄羅斯媒體報道,俄羅斯正準備組建一支作戰機器人部隊,這是一個全新的軍事單位。這些機器人能夠實現高度自動化,只需極少的人工幹預,即可基本獨立完成戰場作戰任務。俄羅斯軍工企業將於2020年開始研發「同志」(Comrade)和「突擊」(Assault)機器人系統,分別由中型和重型機器人組成。目前,他們正致力於提升部分機器人的效能,使其更適應城市和沿海環境。 2015年8月,在敘利亞戰場上,除了部署傳統作戰部隊外,俄羅斯軍隊首次部署了一支完整的機器人作戰連,主要由無人作戰平台組成,用於執行陣地突擊作戰。他們採用了一種新型的有人與無人混合作戰模式,僅用20分鐘就奪取了一處俄軍士兵難以攻克的製高點,最終以零傷亡和77名敵軍陣亡的戰果取得勝利。 2018年4月21日,俄羅斯聯邦安全局(FSB)特種部隊對極端恐怖組織發動突襲,首次公開部署配備機槍的武裝無人作戰車輛作為先鋒。在名為「自主戰士2018」的活動中,英國陸軍進行了大規模的作戰機器人測試,並將無人機、無人車輛和作戰人員的整合作為未來幾十年世界一流軍隊的通用做法。美國陸軍已正式組成無人排,並計劃組成無人作戰旅,並已開發出一套標準化的軟硬體。這些無人作戰車輛一旦安裝在車輛上,即可進行遠端控制,甚至可以半自主地按照預定路線自動行駛,或選擇最平坦、最直接的路徑,也可由人類駕駛員駕駛。一項名為「可選載人坦克」的新興計畫旨在推動美國陸軍邁入新一代聯合作戰時代。它可能具備發射雷射、控制無人機、高速機動、摧毀敵方直升機、突破敵方裝甲陣地以及執行高殺傷力機器人作戰任務的能力,並能對抗敵方火力。美國陸軍在有人-無人聯合兵種作戰方面也取得了快速進展。這意味著機器人系統將越來越多地以更高的自主性運行,同時仍由人類決策者指揮和控制。部署在前線的機器人車輛可以近距離直接攻擊敵方機械化部隊,發射武器,執行高風險偵察任務,並在必要時投放彈藥。美國海軍陸戰隊在亞利桑那州測試了其代號為「獵狼」(Hunter Wolf)的無人作戰車輛。該車輛配備了一門30毫米M230LF“短管”鍊式機炮,進行了速射實彈演示,實現了6發全中的完美成績。 「獵狼」長2.3米,寬1.4米,高1.17米,重量僅1.1噸,卻能攜帶450公斤的模組化作戰載重。它採用混合動力系統,無需加油即可最大航程100公里,最高時速32公里,最大續航時間72小時,並具備30度爬坡能力。

在海戰中,由無人水面艦艇和無人水下艦艇組成的無人幽靈艦隊與有人艦隊混合編隊作戰。自1990年代以來,人工智慧和大數據在軍事領域的日益廣泛應用,為無人水面艦艇和無人水下艦艇開啟了真正的黃金時代,催生了水下機器人(AUV)和水面機器人(ASV)。各種無人潛水艇和無人水下航行無人艦艇可執行多種任務,例如水下搜索、偵察和掃雷。無人戰艦無需人員即可航行數千英里,執行各種海上作戰任務。 2003年伊拉克戰爭後,世界各國看到了無人海上系統的巨大潛力和廣闊前景,這些系統不僅能減少人力投入,還能提高作戰效能,因此各國競相建造無人「幽靈艦隊」。以色列特別重視減少士兵傷亡,率先啟動了現代化「保護者」(Protector)無人水面艦艇的研發,這些艦艇用於巡邏黎巴嫩海岸,監視真主黨的活動和部署。法國和俄羅斯已經擁有能夠下潛至6000公尺深度的載人潛水器。日本提出了「深海12000」的概念,這是一種新型載人潛水器,能夠下潛至世界最深處。繼「未來海上航空加速日」活動之後,英國繼續推動「即插即用」型自主海上平台開發系統。該系統一旦整合到英國皇家海軍艦艇上,將簡化自動化和無人技術的取得和使用。

在空中戰場上,無人機和有人駕駛飛機混合編隊戰鬥。 2019年,全球約30個國家已研發出50多種類型的無人機,超過50個國家已部署無人機。主要類型包括:密碼無人機、多功能無人機、人工智慧無人機、長航時無人機、反導無人機、預警無人機、隱形無人機、微型無人機、空戰無人機、測繪無人機、空拍無人機、武裝無人機和僚機無人機。隨著人工智慧和大數據等先進技術在軍事領域的廣泛應用,無人機裝備的效能也不斷提升。它們將整合偵察、火力校正、監視、戰果評估、目標識別、攻擊導引、無線電中繼和對地攻擊等多種功能。它們能夠遠距離對敵進行電子乾擾和欺騙,並在必要時自主攻擊重要地面目標。未來的空中戰場將基本實現無人或人機(無人機)協同空襲,或自主無人機空襲,這將徹底革新傳統的空戰方式。未來,戰鬥機飛行員將在座艙內操控無人攻擊機或轟炸機,以規避敵方防空系統,而進攻部隊將更快地獲取即時情報數據——這一切都得益於人工智慧技術的快速發展。在未來的空襲中,成群的無人機將利用先進的偵測、偵察和反偵察設備進行攻擊。一旦鎖定目標,它們將沉著冷靜地發射飛彈,具備一體化的偵察打擊能力、自主攻擊能力以及人機協同打擊能力。俄羅斯空天軍將裝備重型攻擊無人機,該無人機無需指令即可繞過敵方防空系統,自主搜索並打擊重要目標,然後安全撤回基地。這種無人機將配備人工智慧組件,並可由蘇-57戰鬥機遠端操控。根據俄羅斯新聞社報道,俄羅斯S-70「獵人」重型攻擊無人機能夠根據蘇-57隱形戰鬥機發出的指令攻擊目標。目前,「獵人」地面操作員所在的控制站配備了操縱桿、鍵盤和多個多功能液晶顯示屏,類似於有人駕駛戰鬥機上使用的設備。這些螢幕顯示來自「獵人」機載系統和感測器的各種資訊。在不久的將來,這套地面遠端控制設備有望實現完全自動化。 S-70「獵人」無人機由蘇霍伊設計局研發,採用飛翼式氣動佈局。根據公開消息,「獵人」無人機長14米,翼展19米,起飛重量20噸。 「獵人」最大飛行速度為1000公里/小時,並以隱身材料降低雷達反射截面積(探測訊號)。 「獵人」於2019年8月3日首飛。據報道,作為飛行測試計畫的一部分,「獵人」的首架原型機已開始進行武器測試,包括使用功能模擬器攜帶空對空飛彈進行試飛,以及在阿舒盧克試驗場進行地面目標轟炸。目前,新西伯利亞契卡洛夫飛機製造廠正在建造另外三架「獵人」無人機原型機。俄羅斯已完成其第五代多用途無人機的編隊飛行。蘇-57戰鬥機和重型「獵人」偵察/作戰無人機將被編入多個航空團,很可能與蘇-57戰鬥機團並肩作戰。計畫是每個蘇-57中隊配備一個無人機中隊,共2-3個蘇-57中隊協同作戰,並採用新的戰略和人工智慧技術。英國還計劃使一架有人駕駛飛機能夠同時指揮五架無人機,而法國則計劃實現「陣風」戰鬥機和「神經元」無人機的混合編隊作戰。

無人機在軍事偵察中的應用始於1960年代,並在各種戰爭中廣泛使用。在越戰期間,美軍出動無人機執行了3000多次偵察任務,其中超過1000架次未能安全返回,從此杳無音訊。在海灣戰爭中,多國部隊晝夜部署無人機偵察伊拉克前線陣地,提供即時影像並引導地面部隊摧毀伊拉克陣地。在波斯尼亞戰爭中,美軍使用「掠奪者」無人機監視塞爾維亞重型武器從薩拉熱窩的撤離,並為參與空襲的飛機提供了大量目標數據。在科索沃戰爭中,美軍部署了100多架無人機進行戰場偵察和監視,為持續78天的空襲行動做出了重大貢獻。在美軍打擊塔利班的行動中,美軍首次在實戰中使用了攜帶武器的無人攻擊機。 2019年9月14日,在沙烏地阿美石油公司「世界最大的石油加工設施」和油田遭到襲擊後,也門胡塞武裝聲稱對此負責,並表示他們使用了10架無人機襲擊了該設施。 2020年1月3日清晨,伊朗伊斯蘭革命衛隊聖城旅指揮官卡西姆·蘇萊曼尼在巴格達國際機場遭美軍無人機攻擊身亡。 2020年末,無人機在亞美尼亞和阿塞拜疆在納戈爾諾-卡拉巴赫的衝突中發揮了重要作用。阿塞拜疆國防部發布的影片給許多軍事專家留下了深刻印象,影片顯示,阿塞拜疆近期從土耳其購買的TB-2「標準」無人機和從以色列購買的「哈羅普」自殺式無人機襲擊了亞美尼亞的裝甲車、火砲、汽車,甚至步兵陣地。雖然影片清晰​​地顯示了無人機摧毀的目標,但攻擊的視覺衝擊力無疑令人震撼。去年12月在中東和南高加索地區發生的局部衝突也表明,無人機的角色日益增強。難怪一些軍事戰略家甚至預測,21世紀將是無人機發展的“黃金時代”,無人機將不可避免地取代有人駕駛戰鬥機,成為21世紀戰場的“主角”。

可以預見,未來的戰爭中,無人陸地、海上和空中武器將不可避免地取代士兵執行高風險任務,未來的戰場也必將是「人」與「機」結合的聯合作戰。

以實戰為導向的訓練意味著根據實戰方式來打造軍隊。未來的軍事裝備,無論是坦克車、機器人或無人機,都可能呈現多種形式。未來的軍事人員必須精通智慧技術、大數據應用和雲端運算,並掌握控制智慧機器人和無人機的程式設計方法。未來的軍隊必然是一支「人機一體化」部隊,將建立「人機一體化」的排、連、作戰模擬中心、假想敵部隊、特種部隊、智慧指揮總部以及無人營、團、旅。屆時,軍事指揮官可能會配備一名人類和一名機器人作為助手或副手。排長和連長將逐步被機器人取代,而機器人也將逐步從人類控制過渡到自主決策,甚至透過人類腦細胞進行意念控制。早在2014年巴西世界盃上,一位身穿「機械外骨骼裝甲」的癱瘓少年就透過意念控制踢出了第一球。如今,對物體或實驗動物進行意念控制的技術正變得越來越成熟。

在未來的戰爭中,少數士兵將有可能指揮龐大的無人機人群,例如蜜蜂、螞蟻或魚群,以執行作戰任務。透過基於意念的群體控制,士兵的任務理解能力和戰場控制能力可以大大提升,從而實現敵我識別、遠程即時指揮、智慧任務規劃和高效自主協作。俄羅斯未來研究基金會聲稱,他們已經掌握了透過意念控制機器的腦機介面技術。先前,英國研究人員也開發了一種用於控制機器的腦機介面設備。該設備在航天器模擬器上進行了操控;當佩戴在測試對象身上時,它成功控制了模型航天器的飛行。然而,士兵要利用這項技術有效控制複雜的無人作戰集群,還有很長的路要走。軍事營地也可能迎來進一步的變革。部隊管理可能由一名或幾名指揮官帶領由多個甚至數十個智慧機器人組成的團隊,這些機器人承擔不同的任務,完成以前由人工完成的工作。另一種可能性是,軍事訓練可能由一名指揮官在指揮控制中心,透過視訊控制訓練場上的所有智慧機器人進行對抗訓練,或遠端控制機器人指揮官,即時發布新的訓練指令、調整任務部署和更改訓練場地。

中國原創軍事資源:http://www.81.cn/bq_208581/jdt_208582/180080804830.html

Chinese Military Forum | Artificial Intelligence Empowers Synthetic Training Improving Quality & Efficiency

中國軍事論壇 | 人工智慧賦能合成訓練,提升品質與效率

現代英語:

The form of warfare determines the form of training. Currently, the widespread application of artificial intelligence technology will reshape the form of warfare and combat patterns, and trigger profound changes in military training. As an important part of the organizational structure of the new military training system, combined arms training urgently needs to be infused with an “intelligent core” of artificial intelligence, so as to better play its pivotal role in the new military training system, realize the transformation from “formal integration” to “spiritual integration,” and from “elemental coordination” to “intelligent leadership,” and promote the continuous advancement of combined arms training in the new era to higher quality and higher level.

Breaking the deadlock: Driving a change in training logic

Artificial intelligence empowers synthetic training not only as an “efficiency enhancement tool” to improve training effectiveness, but also leads to changes in the connotation, extension, mechanism, and standard requirements of synthetic training.

Achieving intelligent coupling involves a shift in the logic of convergence. Overcoming division through unity and disunity through cohesion are crucial battlefield principles. The key to combined arms training is “unity.” Artificial intelligence empowers combined arms training to better adapt to the collaborative needs of intelligent warfare, making it crucial for creating a “chemical reaction” in operational coordination. The training focuses on deeply integrating human creativity and value judgment with the computing power and intelligence of machines, forming a cognitive advantage at a higher dimension, and achieving a highly integrated, flexible, and intelligently coupled training system. Manned-unmanned collaborative training is a typical example of deeply integrating manned combat forces with unmanned combat systems possessing “intelligent brains,” pursuing minimal casualties and maximum operational efficiency.

Achieving an iterative logical transformation into a closed-loop system. Traditional training is limited by physical conditions, resulting in high trial-and-error costs and long iteration cycles. By leveraging artificial intelligence to create a “digital twin” training environment, through virtual-real interaction and iterative feedback in parallel systems, synthetic training can shift towards a process of continuous exploration, trial-and-error optimization, forming a new training closed loop. Training at different levels can be implemented simultaneously, and thousands of tactics can be tested and optimized in parallel in virtual space at low cost and high speed. The various elements of overall combat capability can be generated almost independently without regard to sequence. At the same time, the generation of combat capabilities exhibits certain characteristics of distribution, synchronicity, integration, and nonlinearity, significantly compressing the traditional training cycle, accelerating the synchronous generation of combat capabilities across levels, and further expanding the iteration of combat capabilities to “intra-domain foundation, cross-domain collaboration, and full-domain integration”.

Extending the value logic of intelligent emergence. Traditional training cannot pre-plan all possible interactions, nor can it easily generate new tactics and collaborative modes that go beyond pre-set plans. This dilemma is difficult to overcome when facing the demands of intelligent warfare. However, artificial intelligence is quietly changing this model, transforming the value of the training ground from simulating past wars to exploring the possibilities of future wars. Artificial intelligence empowers synthetic training, injecting it with the underlying driving force to generate “intelligent emergence.” For example, game-like confrontations with intelligent opposing forces force trainees to break out of conventional thinking frameworks, potentially leading to previously unthinkable, counterintuitive tactical combinations. The purpose of synthetic training is not only to execute known tactics, but also to hone the ability to innovate methods and update strategies in adversarial environments.

Reconstruction: Shaping Synthetic Training Patterns

Synthetic training incorporating artificial intelligence is gradually evolving into a new training model that emphasizes combat-oriented organization, focuses on enhancing intelligence and integration, shifts towards distributed autonomy, and is geared towards dynamic battlefields.

The training focuses on combat-oriented grouping. Today’s combined arms training features more diverse training subjects, more varied force compositions, and higher capability requirements. The training emphasizes combat-oriented grouping, focusing on mission-driven consistency between training and combat, and is characterized by modularity, innovation, and scalability. Artificial intelligence, acting as a “dispatch center,” can assess the status of combat units based on the battlefield situation, quickly generate optimal force grouping plans, allocate relevant elements as needed, integrate new domain and new quality forces, and practice how to quickly aggregate and disperse forces to form flexible “mission-customized” combined arms groups. This provides the system with plug-and-play capability modules that can be dynamically reconstructed, efficiently linked, and adaptively adjusted like building blocks.

Training content leans towards enhancing intelligence and integration. Traditional training focuses more on assessing whether coordinated actions are completed according to plan, time limits, and standards. In intelligent warfare, humans and intelligent systems together form the basic combat components, exerting combat effectiveness through their functional division and deep integration. Therefore, the focus of new-era integrated training should also pay more attention to improving human-machine integration capabilities. In the past, training content based on human-to-human collaboration—including technology upgrades, experience-based training, and self-awareness training—has become less effective. Training content that enhances intelligence and integration is gradually becoming the key to integrated training. In tactical coordination training, trainees need to master how to collaborate and interact efficiently with artificial intelligence systems, how to use artificial intelligence to reorganize collaborative relationships, close the kill chain, coordinate joint troop actions, and achieve “combined punches”.

Training methods are shifting towards distributed and autonomous approaches. The changes brought about by artificial intelligence to combined arms training are primarily reflected in training methods. This involves not only mastering coordinated operations and solidifying the foundation of collaboration, but also in how to innovatively lead the evolution of combat systems. Distributed training, relying on AI technology, supports simultaneous, remote joint training between different combat units under the same combat background, scenario, and battlefield situation, improving training effectiveness. Autonomous training, employing a “human-outside-the-loop” approach, hones trainees’ ability to handle contingencies and act autonomously. Through feedback and self-adjustment, it promotes autonomous iterative upgrades. Conducting adversarial training breaks through the limitations of learning to fight from experience in the past. It introduces an AI-powered “blue team” to “learn” to fight in a simulated complex battlefield environment, adding random, extreme, and highly harassed scenarios.

Training scenarios are geared towards dynamic battlefields. Traditional training scenarios are mostly “pre-set scripts” designed around “established capabilities” and “known threats,” unable to break free from limited cognition and established thinking patterns. Artificial intelligence empowers synthetic training, transforming it into a “dynamic game system” targeting “unknown capabilities” and “emerging threats,” making it more “imaginative.” Based on training objectives, artificial intelligence autonomously generates logical, multi-domain, and multi-dimensional virtual combat scenarios. Through repeated practice in such highly complex and uncertain environments, trainees are more likely to develop new understandings of the future battlefield.

Exploration: Prospective Synthetic Training Path

Artificial intelligence-enabled synthetic training is an iterative evolutionary process. Looking ahead at its development path, the aim is to transcend developmental limitations and narrow-minded thinking, directly addressing “multi-agent game theory” and “digital twin training grounds,” thereby achieving multi-dimensional and systematic advancement.

Build a comprehensive training foundation. Based on digital twins and intelligent technologies, create a comprehensive training environment to achieve intelligent interaction between people, equipment, and environment. This will enable all training combat units to become dynamically adjustable “intelligent agents,” conduct cross-domain training, improve the command, decision-making, and adaptive coordination capabilities of human-machine hybrid intelligence, and incubate new tactics and formation patterns in a realistic battlefield environment.

Deploy an intelligent blue force system. Build an algorithmic adversary with autonomous evolution capabilities and dynamic game theory thinking, shifting training from “adapting to the known” to “coping with the unknown.” Through deep reinforcement learning and game theory models, the intelligent blue force can not only learn known tactical experiences but also autonomously generate diverse tactics based on real-time situations. Furthermore, it can gain insights into the opponent’s behavioral patterns during interactions, prompting the development of real and effective strategies in dynamic confrontations, and honing the unit’s tactical innovation and human-machine collaboration capabilities through continuous high-intelligence confrontations.

Innovate integrated training models. New-era combined arms training demands innovation-driven, technology-enabled approaches, requiring bold exploration and willingness to experiment. This necessitates seamlessly integrating testing grounds, training grounds, and battlefields, and innovating an integrated training model encompassing operational testing institutions, training institutions, and troops. Trainers are not merely simple technology providers and supporters, but rather embedded as training designers, process analysts, and evaluators within the training process. This allows for a better understanding and methodological revolution in training, validating new technologies, tactics, and formations in combined arms training, exploring future combat winning mechanisms, and simultaneously using data from real-world training to optimize artificial intelligence models, forming an integrated and interactive closed loop that truly integrates training with real-world application.

現代國語:

戰爭形式決定訓練形式。目前,人工智慧技術的廣泛應用將重塑戰爭形式和作戰模式,並引發軍事訓練的深刻變革。作為新軍事訓練體系組織結構的重要組成部分,諸兵種合成訓練亟需注入人工智能的“智能核心”,以更好地發揮其在新軍事訓練體系中的關鍵作用,實現從“形式融合”到“精神融合”、“要素協調”到“智能領導”的轉變,推動新時代諸兵種合成訓練不斷邁向更高水平、更高質量的發展。

打破僵局:驅動訓練邏輯的變革

人工智慧賦予合成訓練的權力不僅在於將其作為提升訓練效果的“效率增強工具”,更在於引發合成訓練在內涵、延伸、機制和標準要求等方面的變革。

實現智慧耦合意味著融合邏輯的轉變。以團結化解分裂,以凝聚力化解紛爭,是戰場上至關重要的原則。聯合兵種訓練的關鍵在於「團結」。人工智慧賦能聯合兵種訓練,使其更適應智慧戰爭的協同作戰需求,從而在作戰協調中產生「化學反應」。該訓練著重於將人類的創造力和價值判斷與機器的運算能力和智慧深度融合,形成更高維度的認知優勢,並建構高度整合、靈活且智慧耦合的訓練體系。有人-無人協同訓練是將有人作戰部隊與擁有「智慧大腦」的無人作戰系統深度融合的典型例證,旨在最大限度地減少傷亡並提高作戰效率。

實現迭代邏輯轉換,形成閉環系統。傳統訓練受限於物理條件,導致試誤成本高且迭代週期長。透過利用人工智慧創造「數位孿生」訓練環境,在平行系統中實現虛擬實境互動和迭代回饋,合成訓練可以轉向持續探索、試誤優化的過程,形成新的訓練閉環。不同層級的訓練可以同時進行,數千種戰術可以在虛擬空間中以低成本、高速度並行測試和最佳化。整體作戰能力的各要素幾乎可以獨立生成,無需考慮順序。同時,作戰能力的生成呈現出一定的分佈性、同步性、整合性和非線性特徵,顯著壓縮了傳統訓練週期,加速了跨層級作戰能力的同步生成,並將作戰能力的迭代進一步擴展至「域內基礎、跨域協同、全局融合」。

拓展智能湧現的價值邏輯。傳統訓練無法預先規劃所有可能的交互,也難以產生超越預設計劃的新戰術和協同模式。面對智慧戰爭的需求,這一困境難以克服。然而,人工智慧正在悄悄改變這個模式,將訓練場的價值從模擬過去的戰爭轉變為探索未來戰爭的可能性。人工智慧賦能合成訓練,為其註入了產生「智慧湧現」的內在驅動力。例如,與智慧敵軍進行遊戲式的對抗,迫使受訓人員打破傳統的思維框架,可能催生出以前難以想像、違反直覺的戰術組合。合成訓練的目的不僅在於執行已知的戰術,更在於磨練在對抗環境中創新方法和更新策略的能力。

重構:塑造合成訓練模式

融合人工智慧的合成訓練正逐步演變為一種新的訓練模式,強調以作戰為導向的組織,專注於提升情報和協同作戰能力,轉向分散式自主作戰,並適應動態戰場環境。

訓練重點在於以作戰為導向的編隊。如今的聯合兵種訓練具有更多樣化的訓練科目、更豐富的兵力構成以及更高的能力要求。此訓練強調以戰鬥為導向的分組,專注於訓練與實戰之間任務驅動的一致性,並以模組化、創新性和可擴展性為特點。人工智慧作為「調度器」發揮作用。「指揮中心」能夠根據戰場態勢評估作戰單位的狀態,快速生成最優兵力編組方案,根據需要調配相關要素,整合新領域和新素質的部隊,並演練如何快速集結和分散兵力,形成靈活的「任務定制」合成兵種群。這為系統提供了即插即用的能力模組,可以像積木一樣動態重構、高效連接和自適應調整。

訓練內容傾向於增強智慧化和一體化能力。傳統訓練更著重於評估協同行動是否按計劃、按時、按標準完成。在智慧戰中,人和智慧系統共同構成基本的作戰要素,透過功能分工和深度融合發揮作戰效能。因此,新時代一體化訓練的重點也應更重視提升人機融合能力。過去基於人際協作的訓練內容——包括技術升級、經驗訓練和自我意識訓練——效果已下降。增強智慧化和一體化能力的訓練內容正逐漸成為一體化訓練的關鍵。在戰術協調方面,在訓練中,受訓人員需要掌握如何與人工智慧系統高效協作和互動,如何利用人工智慧重組協作關係,完善殺傷鏈,協調聯合部隊行動,並實現「組合打擊」。

訓練方法正朝著分散式和自主化方向發展。人工智慧為聯合兵種訓練帶來的變革主要體現在訓練方法上。這不僅包括掌握協同作戰和鞏固協作基礎,還包括如何創新地引領作戰系統演進。分散式訓練依賴人工智慧技術,支援不同作戰單位在相同作戰背景、場景和戰場情勢下進行同步遠程聯合訓練,進而提高訓練效率。自主訓練採用「人外環」的方式,磨練受訓人員處理突發事件和自主行動的能力。透過回饋和自我調整,促進自主迭代升級。對抗訓練突破了以往從經驗中學習作戰的局限性,引入人工智慧驅動的「藍隊」進行「學習」。在模擬的複雜戰場環境中作戰,並加入隨機、極端和高度騷擾的場景。

訓練場景面向動態戰場。傳統的訓練場景大多是圍繞著“既有能力”和“已知威脅”設計的“預設腳本”,無法突破認知限制和既定思維模式的束縛。人工智慧賦能合成訓練,將其轉變為針對“未知能力”和“新興威脅”的“動態博弈系統”,使其更具“想像力”。基於訓練目標,人工智慧自主產生邏輯嚴密、多域、多維度的虛擬作戰場景。透過在高度複雜和不確定的環境中反覆練習,受訓人員更有可能對未來的戰場形成新的理解。

探索:合成訓練的未來路徑

人工智慧賦能的合成訓練是一個迭代演進的過程。展望其發展路徑,目標是超越發展局限和狹隘思維,直接面向“多智能體博弈論”和“數位孿生訓練場”,從而實現…多維度、系統性推進。

建構綜合訓練基礎。基於數位孿生與智慧技術,創造綜合訓練環境,實現人、裝備、環境的智慧互動。這將使所有訓練作戰單位成為動態可調的“智能體”,開展跨域訓練,提升人機混合智能的指揮、決策和自適應協調能力,並在真實戰場環境下孵化新的戰術和陣型。

部署智慧藍軍系統。建構具備自主演化能力和動態博弈論思維的演算法對手,將訓練重心從「適應已知」轉向「應對未知」。透過深度強化學習和賽局理論模型,智慧藍軍不僅能夠學習已知的戰術經驗,還能根據即時情況自主生成多樣化的戰術。此外,它還能洞察對手在互動中的行為模式,進而促進戰術的演進。在動態對抗中製定切實有效的戰略,並透過持續的高智慧對抗來磨練部隊的戰術創新能力和人機協作能力。

創新一體化訓練模式。新時代的聯合兵種訓練需要創新驅動、技術賦能的方法,需要大膽探索和勇於嘗試。這就要求無縫整合試驗場、訓練場和戰場,並創新涵蓋作戰測試機構、訓練機構和部隊的一體化訓練模式。教官不再只是技術提供者和支持者,而是作為訓練設計者、流程分析師和評估者融入訓練過程中。這有助於更好地理解訓練方法並進行方法論上的革新,驗證聯合兵種訓練中的新技術、戰術和陣型,探索未來作戰的製勝機制,並同時利用來自真實世界訓練的數據來優化人工智慧模型,從而形成一個真正將訓練與實際應用相結合的整合式互動式閉環。

來源:解放軍報 作者:聶曉麗 趙澤夏 責任編輯:王一亙 2026-01-13 07:xx:xx

聶曉麗 趙澤夏

中國原創軍事資源:http://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/jmsd/164838781898.html

Chinese Military Cyberspace Forces: Intelligent Command of the Storms and a Dense Skynet

中國軍事網路空間力量:對風暴的智慧指揮與密集的“天網”

現代英語:

Wisdom in control of the winds and clouds, weaving a dense net.

■ Commentary by Peng Bingjie, reporter for PLA Daily

With steel guns in hand and shouts echoing through the heavens, their steps were firm and their spirit soared.

Led by two team leaders, the cyberspace troops marched in majestically, each figure exuding heroic spirit, and each formation perfectly aligned.

On April 19, 2024, the Cyberspace Force was officially established as a brand-new strategic branch of service. In this military parade, this high-tech force, born at the pinnacle of the digital wave and fighting on the invisible battlefield, gloriously received the review of the Party and the people. The officers and soldiers in the formation had an average age of 24, and their high level of education was a prominent feature.

“Right face!” The command was powerful and resounding, soaring into the sky. “One—two—” The loud shouts echoed throughout Tiananmen Square.

In front of Tiananmen Square, First-Class Sergeant Cheng Shujia gripped the flagpole tightly, his eyes blazing and his movements powerful. Following closely behind, the officers and soldiers being reviewed stood in neat rows, the hundreds of people forming a unified whole, as if they were one person.

“It is an immense honor to be a member of the cyberspace forces contingent and to be reviewed in Tiananmen Square with my comrades.” Cheng Shujia, who participated in the 70th National Day military parade, was reviewed again six years later as the flag bearer of the cyberspace forces contingent.

“Holding the military flag and making our first appearance, we must maintain a good posture at all times and show the style of our cyberspace forces.” From the first day he stepped onto the training field, Cheng Shujia silently told himself that he must “make a stunning entrance and a spectacular debut.”

On the eve of this year’s “August 1st” Army Day, President Xi Jinping signed an order to release the designs of the flags for the four branches of the armed forces. On that same day, Cheng Shujia, representing the cyberspace forces, received the flag belonging to his formation for the first time. After repeatedly stroking the flag, he felt that “the flag in my hand has become heavier.”

“Behind this brand-new military flag lies the glorious and profound history of our branch of the military,” said Cheng Shujia. During the revolutionary war years, the predecessors of this unit, amidst hardships and difficulties, took the Party’s flag as their own, dedicated themselves to their mission, climbed higher and higher, made outstanding contributions time and time again, and made selfless contributions, erecting a wordless monument to their loyalty to their mission.

In the era of reform and strengthening the military, heroic troops are tempered and refined; amidst the unpredictable changes in the world, new strategic forces are emerging. Traversing the mysterious cyberspace and fighting on the hidden digital peaks, officers and soldiers of the cyberspace forces will combine every word and character into a mighty army, building an iron wall within a small space and weaving a magnificent sky net with the torrent of information.

With a resolute face, upright posture, and resounding steps, Zhou Wenlong, a student from the Information Engineering University of the Cyberspace Force, stood out among the formation with exceptional focus.

From a “rising star” in the laboratory to a member of the parade team, Zhou Wenlong’s every step forward has required unimaginable effort and sweat. “When doing something, you have to pursue excellence. This spirit is the same in scientific research and military parades,” Zhou Wenlong said.

“When a group of people work on a single task, whether in the laboratory or on the parade ground, we always share a common goal and pursuit.” Zhou Wenlong’s eyes shone brightly in the sunlight. Behind him, faces were equally young and resolute.

With wisdom and strategic brilliance, they command armies and survey the vast sky. This group of vibrant young people are dedicating their youth to the land and rivers of their motherland.

On Tiananmen Square, Wang Zizhu, a member of the reviewing team, marched with firm and proud steps. Seeing this, Hu Yang, the company commander below the parade ground, smiled with satisfaction.

Six years ago, Hu Yang and his comrades marched in perfect unison across Tiananmen Square. As an instructor, he uses his own military parade experience as vivid teaching material, influencing and inspiring generations of students to study diligently and make contributions to the military. This year, more than 20 students, including Wang Zizhu, from the Cyberspace Force Information Engineering University, took to the parade ground under his guidance.

Six years later, Hu Yang’s position shifted from the forefront to behind the scenes. He and the coaches used what they had learned to innovate training methods and strengthen service support to ensure that the formation always maintained high training motivation and fighting spirit.

“Success doesn’t have to be achieved by me, but I will definitely contribute to it. Even if I can’t participate, I will still shine for the collective honor.” Hu Yang said, “Taking responsibility and making selfless contributions” is the common spirit of officers and soldiers in the cyberspace forces.

The battle songs resounded, the flags flew high, and the common aspirations of the officers and soldiers of the cyberspace forces were gathered: to shoulder the glorious mission, to demonstrate the style of a strong military, and to advance towards victory and the great rejuvenation!

(PLA Daily, Beijing, September 3)

現代國語:

智慧掌控風雲,織就密網。

■ 彭冰傑,《解放軍報》記者

他們手持鋼槍,吶喊聲響徹雲霄,步伐堅定,精神振奮。

在兩位隊長的帶領下,網路空間部隊威風凜凜地入場,每個身影都洋溢著英雄氣概,每個隊形都整齊劃一。

2024年4月19日,網路空間部隊正式成立,成為一支全新的戰略兵種。在這場閱兵式上,這支誕生於數位浪潮之巔、馳騁於無形戰場的高科技部隊,光榮地接受了黨和人民的檢閱。隊形中的官兵平均年齡24歲,高學歷是一大亮點。

「正臉!」一聲鏗鏘有力的命令響徹雲霄。 「一、二——」響亮的喊聲響徹天安門廣場。

在天安門廣場前,一級軍士長程樹佳緊緊握著旗桿,目光炯炯,動作有力。緊接在後的是整齊列隊的官兵,數百人組成一個整體,彷彿融為一體。

「能夠作為網路空間部隊的一員,與戰士們一起在天安門廣場接受檢閱,我感到無比榮幸。」曾參加過第70屆國慶閱兵的程樹佳,六年後再次作為網絡空間部隊的旗手接受檢閱。

「手持軍旗,首次亮相,我們必須時時保持良好的姿態,展現我們網路空間部隊的風采。」從踏上訓練場的第一天起,程樹佳就默默地告誡自己,一定要「驚艷亮相,留下輝煌的首秀」。

在今年「八一」建軍節前夕,習近平主席簽署命令,公佈了四軍各軍種的旗幟設計。當天,代表網路空間部隊的程樹佳首次領取了本部隊的旗幟。他反覆撫摸著旗幟,感覺「手中的旗幟越來越沉了」。

程樹佳說:「這面嶄新的軍旗背後,承載著我們軍種光榮而深厚的歷史。」在革命戰爭年代,本部隊的前輩們在艱苦卓絕的戰鬥中,將黨的旗幟視為己任,全身心投入到使命中,不斷攀登高峰,一次又一次地做出傑出貢獻使命,無私的奉獻,為忠於的豐碑。

在改革開放、軍力強盛的時代,英雄部隊正在淬煉、精煉;在瞬息萬變的世界中,新的戰略力量正在湧現。穿梭於神秘的網路空間,在隱密的數字山峰上奮戰,網路空間部隊的官兵們將每一個字、每一個字符匯聚成一支強大的軍隊,在狹小的空間內築起一道鋼鐵屏障,用信息的洪流編織出一張宏偉的天網。

周文龍,這位來自網路空間部隊資訊工程大學的學生,神情堅定,身姿挺拔,步伐鏗鏘有力,在隊伍中格外引人注目。

從實驗室的「明日之星」到閱兵隊伍的一員,周文龍的每一步都凝聚著難以想像的努力和汗水。 「做事就要追求卓越。這種精神在科研和閱兵中都是一樣的。」周文龍說。

「當一群人為了同一個目標而努力時,無論是在實驗室還是在閱兵場上,我們始終擁有共同的目標和追求。」周文龍的雙眼在陽光下閃閃發光。在他身後,一張張年輕而堅定的臉孔映入眼簾。

他們以智慧和卓越的戰略才能指揮軍隊,俯瞰廣闊的天空。這群充滿活力的年輕人,將他們的青春奉獻給了祖國的土地和河流。

在天安門廣場上,檢閱隊隊員王子柱邁著堅定而驕傲的步伐。看到這一幕,檢閱場下的連長胡陽露出了滿意的笑容。

六年前,胡陽和他的戰友們整齊劃一地走過天安門廣場。身為教官,他以自己的閱兵經驗為生動的教學素材,影響和激勵了一代又一代的學生努力學習,為軍隊做出貢獻。今年,包括王子柱在內的20多名來自網路空間部隊資訊工程大學的學生,在他的指導下走上了閱兵場。

六年後的今天,胡陽的位置從前線轉向了幕後。他和教官運用所學到的知識,創新訓練方法,加強後勤保障,以確保軍隊的順利進行。網路空間部隊始終保持著高昂的訓練熱情和戰鬥精神。

「成功不一定要靠我一個人取得,但我一定會為之貢獻力量。即使不能親自參與,我也要為集體的榮譽而閃耀。」胡洋說,「勇於擔當,無私奉獻」是網絡空間部隊官兵的共同精神。

戰歌齊鳴,旗幟飄揚,網路空間部隊官兵的共同願望匯聚於此:肩負光榮使命,展現強軍風範,向勝利和偉大復興邁進!

(《解放軍報》,北京,9月3日)

來源:中國軍網-解放軍報 作者:嘉 言 彭冰潔 責任編輯:李佳琦 2025-09-04 09:xx:xx

中國原創軍事資源:http://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/wzll/16488078858589.html

Chinese Military Strengthening Forum | Improving Effectiveness of Manned & Unmanned Collaborative Operations

中國軍事強化論壇 | 提升有人與無人協同作戰效能

現代英語:

Reconnaissance and assault unmanned vehicles, new types of unmanned underwater vehicles, and new integrated reconnaissance and strike drones… A batch of unmanned intelligent equipment made their debut at the military parade held on September 3rd to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, showcasing the new achievements made in the development of the PLA’s unmanned intelligent combat capabilities. For officers and soldiers, it is essential to strive to learn and effectively utilize unmanned intelligent equipment to improve the effectiveness of manned and unmanned coordinated combat.

The report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China emphasized accelerating the development of unmanned intelligent combat forces. The widespread application of artificial intelligence in the military field is profoundly influencing the development of the world’s military, giving rise to new combat methods and concepts, and accelerating the evolution of warfare towards intelligence. The participation of unmanned combat forces in military operations is increasing daily, and unmanned intelligent warfare has become a new growth engine for enhancing system-wide combat capabilities. Lenin said, “Without understanding the times, one cannot understand war.” A significant characteristic of recent local wars and armed conflicts worldwide is the increasingly large-scale use of unmanned platforms, the increasingly profound empowerment of artificial intelligence, and the increasingly close collaboration between manned and unmanned forces. Cross-domain joint operations and unmanned autonomy have become new combat trends.

“To acquire a strong army, one must have strong armor and sharp weapons, and rigorous selection and training.” Manned-unmanned collaborative warfare is the most valuable operational mode for future unmanned warfare and a major form of future warfare. “Unmanned platforms, manned systems, unmanned leadership, and human-machine integration” are the distinctive features of intelligent warfare. To improve capabilities in collaborative reconnaissance, strike, assault, support, and defense, it is essential to strengthen manned-unmanned collaborative training, enhance innovation in “manned + unmanned” tactics, and foster a tacit understanding of “human trust in machines and machines assisting humans” in collaboration. This will accelerate the integration of unmanned intelligent combat forces into the combat system as the “main force” and “protagonist.”

Military strategy relies on intelligence, and victory depends on tactics. As Comrade Ye Jianying said, “If we only master modern military means without correct military theory to guide us, we cannot effectively deal with modernized enemies, and we will at least pay a greater price.” Looking at world military history, Britain invented the tank and was the first to deploy it in actual combat, but failed to make the most of it and never developed a corresponding operational theory. In contrast, at the beginning of World War II, Germany pioneered the operational concept of tank formations, developing it into the “Blitzkrieg” theory, which played a crucial role on the battlefield. Good tactics are better than a thousand troops. Officers and soldiers should continuously improve their technological awareness, innovation, and application capabilities, master the winning mechanisms of intelligent warfare, strengthen specialized training in typical operations, and create more training methods and tactics adapted to the informationized and intelligent battlefield.

Every spear has its shield. The anti-drone formation in this military parade was equally eye-catching. The displayed anti-droneous artillery systems, high-energy laser weapons, and high-power microwave weapons, forming a powerful “iron triangle” for countering drones, capable of both soft-kill and hard-destruction. With the rapid development of unmanned combat forces, how to counter them is an unavoidable issue. In future battlefields, a single combat force will find it difficult to independently complete anti-drone combat missions. Only by comprehensively utilizing various anti-drone equipment and technologies, integrating anti-drone warfare into the joint operations system, adopting flexible tactics and rapid, precise actions, and carrying out targeted strikes or flexible control, can we unlock and unleash the new combat effectiveness of human-machine collaboration and firmly grasp the initiative in winning intelligent warfare.

現代國語:

偵察突擊無人機、新型無人水下航行器、新型偵察打擊一體化無人機…一群無人智能裝備在9月3日舉行的紀念中國人民抗日戰爭暨世界反法西斯戰爭勝利80週年閱兵式上首次亮相,展現了解放軍在發展無人智能作戰能力方面取得的新成果。對官兵而言,努力學習並有效運用無人智慧裝備,提升有人與無人協同作戰的效能至關重要。

中共二十大報告強調加速發展無人智慧作戰力量。人工智慧在軍事領域的廣泛應用,深刻影響世界軍事發展,催生出新的作戰方式和理念,加速了戰爭向智慧化演進的進程。無人作戰力量參與軍事行動的程度日益加深,無人智慧戰已成為提升系統性作戰能力的新動力。列寧曾說:「不了解時代,就不能了解戰爭。」近期全球範圍內的局部戰爭和武裝衝突的一個顯著特徵是:無人平台的使用規模日益擴大,人工智慧的賦能日益深入,有人與無人部隊的協同作戰日益緊密。跨域聯合作戰和無人自主作戰已成為新的作戰趨勢。

「要擁有強大的軍隊,就必須擁有強大的裝甲和鋒利的武器,以及嚴格的選拔和訓練。」人機協同作戰是未來無人作戰最有價值的作戰模式,也是未來戰爭的主要形式之一。 「無人平台、有人系統、無人指揮和人機融合」是智慧戰的顯著特徵。為提升協同偵察、打擊、突擊、支援和防禦能力,必須加強有人-無人協同訓練,提升「有人+無人」戰術創新,培養「人機互信、機輔人」的協同作戰理念。這將加速無人智慧作戰力量融入作戰體系,成為「主力」和「主角」。

軍事戰略靠情報,勝利靠戰術。正如葉劍英同誌所言:「若只掌握現代軍事手段,而沒有正確的軍事理論指導,就無法有效應對現代化敵人,而且至少要付出更大的代價。」縱觀世界軍事手段,英國發明了坦克,並率先將其投入實戰,但未能充分發揮其優勢,也從未發展出相應的作戰理論。相較之下,在二戰初期,德國率先提出了坦克編隊的作戰概念,並將其發展為「閃電戰」理論,在戰場上發揮了至關重要的作用。好的戰術勝過千軍萬馬。官兵應不斷提昇技術意識、創新能力和應用能力,掌握智慧戰爭的勝利機制,加強典型作戰的專項訓練,並創造更多適應資訊化、智慧化戰場的訓練方法和戰術。

每支矛都有其盾。這次閱兵式上的反無人機編隊同樣引人注目。展出的反無人機火砲系統、高能量雷射武器和高功率微波武器,構成了一個強大的反無人機“鐵三角”,兼具軟殺傷和硬摧毀能力。隨著無人作戰力量的快速發展,如何應對無人作戰已成為一個無法迴避的問題。在未來的戰場上,單支作戰部隊將難以獨立完成反無人機作戰任務。只有全面運用各種反無人機裝備和技術,將反無人機作戰融入聯合作戰體系,採取靈活戰術和快速、精確的行動,實施定點打擊或靈活控制,才能解鎖和釋放人機協同作戰的新效能,牢牢掌握贏得智能戰爭的主動權。

來源:解放軍報 作者:張 揚 責任編輯:烏銘琪 2025-10-20 06:xx:xx

中國原創軍事資源:http://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/jmsd/16416356.html

Chinese Military Forum | Initial Exploration of Combat Forms of the People’s War in the Intelligent Warfare Era

中國軍事論壇 | 智慧戰爭時代人民戰爭作戰形式的初步探索

現代英語:

“The deepest source of the power of war lies within the people.” In today’s intelligent age, the magic weapon of people’s war still possesses immense vitality, evolving into new forms such as “technical support,” “data-driven warfare,” “algorithmic guerrilla warfare,” and “sensor-based early warning.” Only by deeply exploring the practical forms and evolutionary logic of people’s war in the intelligent age can this powerful weapon continue to thrive under new historical conditions.

Technology for all

In traditional people’s wars, civilian support primarily focused on the supply of manpower and materials. During the Huaihai Campaign, millions of people pushed wheelbarrows through gunfire to deliver food and ammunition to the front lines; during the Korean War, civilians in the rear worked day and night to produce clothing and other supplies, providing basic necessities for soldiers on the front lines. This form of support, where manpower forms an army and materials flow in a continuous stream, vividly embodies the principle that “the people and the army are the foundation of victory” under specific historical conditions.

In the age of intelligence, civilian participation in warfare is increasingly manifested in technological support. The key to this shift lies in the widespread availability of civilian technology, transforming tools in the hands of the public into convertible combat resources. In the past, advanced technologies were largely monopolized by the military, making civilian participation in warfare extremely difficult. Today, smartphones, civilian drones, and AI development tools are commonplace, allowing ordinary people to master basic technical skills such as data collection, long-range reconnaissance, and information analysis, which can be directly translated into combat effectiveness during wartime. For example, foreign militaries have tested the use of consumer-grade drones equipped with intelligent modules for monitoring personnel activities in forward areas. This means that the public is no longer merely a logistical supporter but also a technological supporter, forming a new foundation of “everyone can participate, and technology can be transformed,” providing new capabilities for higher-level nationwide collaboration.

Behind this evolution lies a clear pattern. First, technological equality is reshaping the barriers to participation. The widespread civilian application of intelligent technologies allows the public to acquire technological capabilities previously exclusive to the military at low cost. Second, the boundaries between military and civilian technologies are blurring. The dual-use nature of technologies such as artificial intelligence and drones allows civilian innovation to directly serve operational needs. Third, the innovation entities are becoming “decentralized.” Technological breakthroughs no longer rely on single laboratories but are dispersed across millions of civilian nodes, including enterprises, makers, and research teams, forming a technology network that enables innovation by all and is usable across all domains. Technological equality has broken the monopoly of military technology, and the deep integration of public wisdom and intelligent tools has given rise to asymmetric advantages in the intelligent era, also endowing people’s war with new connotations and vitality. As the main force of technological innovation shifts to the civilian sector, technological breakthroughs in different dimensions may become the decisive factors on the future battlefield.

Data Crowdsourcing Operations

Traditional people’s wars rely on the widespread mobilization of the masses to create a massive human wave advantage, such as the enthusiastic support of the people during the War of Liberation. This form of warfare can凝聚 a powerful force because it is based on the participation of the entire population, transforming the dispersed individual strength into collective effectiveness.

The dispersed possession of technological capabilities necessitates efficient integration to form a systematic combat force, which is precisely the value of data crowdsourcing warfare. As a crucial link in transforming the dispersed technological capabilities of the entire population into a centralized system, data crowdsourcing warfare solves the problem of fragmented individual capabilities and achieves large-scale resource aggregation. In the intelligent era, everyone is a potential data node and computing power unit. For example, photos taken with a mobile phone can also contribute to information collection in relevant fields. These seemingly scattered individual contributions, through real-time integration using cloud computing and distributed algorithms, can form data processing capabilities and computing power comparable to professional systems. This model of “everyone can participate and contribute at any time” perfectly interprets the essence of “crowdsourcing,” distributing tasks originally undertaken by professional institutions to millions of individual nodes for collaborative completion.

If universal support for technology is “sowing seeds,” then data crowdsourcing warfare is “cultivating a forest.” The key logic enabling its realization lies in three aspects: First, the widespread adoption of smart terminals lowers the barrier to participation. The ubiquity of smart electronic devices empowers every ordinary person with basic data collection and computing power output capabilities, solving the problem of insufficient specialized equipment. Second, technology enables efficient resource aggregation. Cloud computing and distributed algorithms can integrate scattered mobile phone data and fragmented computing power in real time, overcoming the limitations of dispersed individual efforts. Third, the collaborative logic shifts from centralized scheduling to autonomous contribution. The public can upload data or share computing power through simple operations without unified instructions. When thousands of terminal devices become nodes of combat resources, people’s war in the intelligent era builds a new advantage of nationwide data participation and full-domain computing power collaboration, extending the connotation of “military-civilian integration” from physical collaboration to digital collaboration.

Algorithm global guerrilla warfare

In traditional people’s war, guerrilla warfare occupies an important position, serving as a concrete tactical practice of people’s war. The masses, with their familiarity with the terrain and understanding of local conditions, guide guerrillas along concealed routes, transmit intelligence on enemy movements, and provide cover during raids behind enemy lines. The key to this form is the joint efforts of the military and civilians in employing flexible tactics to continuously harass and wear down the enemy behind enemy lines, plunging them into the vast ocean of people’s war.

Aggregated technological resources must ultimately be transformed into actual combat power through tactical application. Algorithmic all-domain guerrilla warfare in the intelligent era is precisely the result of this transformation. Relying on the data and computing power contributed by the entire population, it extends the flexible and mobile characteristics of traditional guerrilla warfare to the digital space, realizing the leap from static storage to dynamic combat of technological resources. Unlike traditional guerrilla warfare, which relies on terrain and manpower, algorithmic all-domain guerrilla warfare’s battlefield spans the entire cyberspace, including the electromagnetic spectrum. It can, like a guerrilla fighter, hide silently in the enemy’s system, waiting for the opportune moment to launch a precise attack; it can, like “sparrow warfare,” launch multi-point harassment through distributed nodes, using scattered attacks to deplete the enemy’s defensive resources; and it can adjust its strategy in real time based on data, dynamically switching attack paths according to the enemy’s system reactions, just as traditional guerrilla fighters change their combat routes according to the enemy situation.

Algorithmic guerrilla warfare is a tactical application of nationwide technological resources. Its evolutionary logic lies in three key aspects: First, the comprehensive expansion of the operational space. Extending from physical spaces like land and sea to virtual spaces like networks and the electromagnetic spectrum, it achieves ubiquitous guerrilla warfare. Second, a generational improvement in decision-making efficiency. Breaking free from the reliance on commander experience in traditional guerrilla warfare, algorithms achieve millisecond-level responses—”discovery equals decision, decision equals action”—based on real-time data. Third, the “decentralization” of power aggregation. Just as traditional guerrilla warfare relies on dispersed militia units, algorithmic guerrilla warfare forms a “swarm” effect through distributed node collaboration; individual nodes, though weak, can collectively create overall combat power. Algorithmic guerrilla warfare continues the essence of people’s war—the ability to overcome the strong with the weak—not only providing flexible and efficient tactical options for modern warfare but also injecting new tactical vitality into people’s war in the intelligent era, becoming a new method and path to victory.

Sensor distribution early warning

In traditional people’s wars, the eyes and ears of the masses are a key support for the early warning system. Limited by technology at the time, early warning systems were primarily built upon human nodes and rudimentary communication methods. For example, village sentries visually monitored target movements, traveling merchants used their mobility to transmit intelligence, and coastal fishermen monitored unusual vessels in the sea based on their production activities. These scattered civilian observation points exchanged information through agreed-upon signals such as “message trees” and “feather letters,” weaving a wide-ranging early warning network. This model, based on the logic of “the people as the main perceptive body and simple means as the interaction link,” while having a limited scope of perception and lower transmission efficiency, highlighted the essential characteristic of people’s war—the participation of the entire population.

In the intelligent era, the participation of all citizens in technology is not only reflected in offensive tactics but also in building a robust defensive barrier. Distributed early warning systems, by leveraging the sensing devices in the hands of the public to form a comprehensive early warning network, represent an extension of technological capabilities from offensive applications to defensive safeguards. In everyday security and collaborative scenarios, electronic devices can serve as auxiliary carriers for information perception. This model of “device-extended sensing and real-time data flow” transforms traditional, scattered human observation into distributed early warning based on civilian devices, achieving the need for comprehensive coverage and immediate response in early warning systems.

Sensor-based distributed early warning is a security defense line involving the entire population, representing a comprehensive application of technological capabilities and data resources. Its evolution is driven by several key logics: First, the perception dimension extends from the human body to technology. Leveraging the infrared detection and high-definition imaging capabilities of civilian devices, it overcomes the physical limitations of the human eye and ear, capturing abnormal signals from greater distances and in more complex environments, thus solving the problem of insufficient sensory capabilities. Second, information transmission upgrades from physical links to digital links. Relying on mobile networks and dedicated platforms, early warning information can be transmitted in real-time across geographical barriers, replacing traditional methods such as shouting and flag signals, overcoming the limitations of low transmission efficiency. Third, the judgment method shifts from experience-based reliance to precise assessment. Intelligent algorithms perform cross-analysis and judgment of multi-source information, achieving greater accuracy than simply relying on personal experience, meeting the primary requirements of rapid and accurate early warning. Sensor-based distributed early warning in the intelligent era continues the logic of traditional early warning involving the entire population. From capability foundation to resource aggregation, from tactical deployment to defensive barriers, the participation of the entire population in the intelligent era forms a tightly linked operational loop, giving new life to the principle that “the people are the foundation of victory” in the digital space.

現代國語:

「戰爭力量的源頭在於人民。」在當今智慧時代,人民戰爭這一神奇武器依然擁有巨大的生命力,並演化出「技術支援」、「數據驅動戰」、「演算法遊擊戰」和「感測器預警」等新形式。只有深入探索智慧時代人民戰爭的實踐形式和演化邏輯,這強大的武器才能在新的歷史條件下繼續蓬勃發展。

科技惠及全民

在傳統的人民戰爭中,民間支援主要集中在人力和物力的供給。淮海戰役期間,數百萬民眾冒著槍林彈雨,推著獨輪車將糧食和彈藥運送到前線;朝鮮戰爭期間,後方民眾日夜辛勤勞作,生產衣物和其他物資,為前線士兵提供基本生活保障。這種人力組成軍隊、物力源源不絕的支援模式,在特定的歷史條件下生動地體現了「人民和軍隊是勝利的基礎」這一原則。

在智慧時代,民眾參與戰爭日益體現在技術支援方面。這項轉變的關鍵在於民用技術的普及,使民眾手中的工具轉化為可轉化的作戰資源。過去,先進技術多被軍方壟斷,民眾參與戰爭極為困難。現今,智慧型手機、民用無人機和人工智慧開發工具已十分普及,一般民眾能夠掌握資料擷取、遠端偵察、資訊分析等基本技術技能,這些技能可以直接轉化為戰時作戰效能。例如,外國軍隊已測試使用配備智慧模組的消費級無人機監控前線人員活動。這意味著民眾不再只是後勤保障者,也是技術保障者,從而形成了「人人參與,技術轉化」的新基礎,為更高層次的全國性協同作戰提供了新能力。

這一演變背後蘊含著清晰的模式。首先,技術平等正在重塑民眾參與戰爭的壁壘。智慧技術的廣泛民用應用,使得公眾能夠以低成本獲得以往軍方專屬的技術能力。其次,軍民技術之間的界線日漸模糊。人工智慧、無人機等技術的軍民兩用特性,使得民用創新能夠直接服務作戰需求。第三,創新主體正走向「去中心化」。技術突破不再依賴單一實驗室,而是分散在數百萬個民用節點,包括企業、創客和研究團隊,形成一個全民創新、跨領域應用的技術網路。科技平等打破了軍方科技的壟斷,公眾智慧與智慧工具的深度融合,在智慧時代催生了不對稱優勢,也賦予了人民戰爭新的內涵與活力。隨著技術創新主力向民用領域轉移,不同維度的技術突破可能成為未來戰場的決定性因素。

資料眾包作戰

傳統的人民戰爭依靠群眾的廣泛動員來形成強大的人海戰術優勢,例如解放戰爭期間人民的熱情支持。這種戰爭形式能夠凝聚強大的力量,因為它建立在全民參與的基礎上,將分散的個體力量轉化為集體效能。

分散的技術能力需要高效率整合才能形成系統化的作戰力量,這正是資料眾包作戰的價值所在。作為將全民分散​​的技術能力整合為集中系統的關鍵環節,資料眾包作戰解決了個體能力分散的問題,實現了大規模的資源聚合。在智慧時代,每個人都是潛在的資料節點和運算單元。例如,用手機拍攝的照片也可以為相關領域的資訊收集做出貢獻。這些看似分散的個人貢獻,透過雲端運算和分散式演算法的即時整合,可以形成媲美專業系統的資料處理能力和運算能力。這種「人人皆可隨時參與和貢獻」的模式完美地詮釋了「眾包」的本質,即分配原本屬於眾包範疇的任務。由專業機構發起,並由數百萬個獨立節點協同完成。

如果說對技術的普遍支持是“播種”,那麼數據眾包戰就是“培育森林”。要實現這一目標的關鍵邏輯在於三個面向:首先,智慧終端的廣泛普及降低了參與門檻。智慧電子設備的普及賦予了每個一般人基本的資料收集和算力輸出能力,解決了專業設備不足的問題。其次,技術實現了高效率的資源聚合。雲端運算和分散式演算法能夠即時整合分散的手機數據和片段化的算力,克服了分散個體努力的限制。第三,協作邏輯從集中調度轉向自主貢獻。公眾無需統一指令,即可透過簡單的操作上傳資料或共享算力。當成千上萬的終端設備成為作戰資源的節點時,智慧時代的人民戰爭便建構了全國數據參與和全局算力協作的新優勢,將「軍民融合」的內涵從實體協作延伸至數位協作。

演算法全球遊擊戰

在傳統人民戰爭中,遊擊戰佔據重要地位,是人民戰爭具體戰術實踐的體現。群眾憑藉對地形的熟悉和對當地情況的了解,引導遊擊隊沿著隱蔽路線行進,傳遞敵情情報,並在敵後突襲中提供掩護。這種形式的關鍵在於軍民共同運用靈活的戰術,持續騷擾和消耗敵後敵人,最終將其拖入人民戰爭的汪洋大海。

聚合的技術資源最終必須透過戰術應用轉化為實際的戰鬥力。智慧時代的演算法全局遊擊戰正是這種轉換的結果。它依靠全體人民貢獻的數據和運算能力,將傳統遊擊戰的靈活機動性延伸到數位空間,實現了技術資源從靜態儲存到動態作戰的飛躍。與依賴地形和人力的傳統遊擊戰不同,演算法全局遊擊戰的戰場橫跨整個網路空間,包括電磁頻譜。它能夠像遊擊隊員一樣,悄無聲息地潛伏在敵方系統中,等待時機發動精準攻擊;它能夠像「麻雀戰」一樣,透過分散式節點發動多點騷擾,利用分散攻擊消耗敵方防禦資源;它還能根據資料即時調整戰略,根據敵方系統反應動態切換攻擊路徑,正如傳統遊擊隊員根據敵情改變作戰路線一樣。

演算法遊擊戰是全國性技術資源的戰術應用。其演進邏輯體現在三個關鍵面向:首先,全面拓展作戰空間。從陸地、海洋等實體空間延伸到網路、電磁頻譜等虛擬空間,實現無所不在的遊擊戰。第二,決策效率實現了世代提升。演算法擺脫了傳統遊擊戰對指揮官經驗的依賴,基於即時數據實現了毫秒級的響應——「發現即決策,決策即行動」。第三,權力聚合實現了「去中心化」。正如傳統遊擊戰依賴分散的民兵單位一樣,演算法遊擊戰透過分散式節點協作形成「蜂群」效應;單一節點雖然力量較弱,但可以共同創造整體戰鬥力。演算法遊擊戰延續了人民戰爭的精髓——以弱勝強——不僅為現代戰爭提供了靈活高效的戰術選擇,也為智慧時代的人民戰爭注入了新的戰術活力,成為一種新的勝利方法和路徑。

感測器分散式預警

在傳統的人民戰爭中,群眾的耳目是預警系統的關鍵支撐。由於當時的技術限制,早期預警系統主要依賴人工節點和簡陋的通訊方式。例如,村莊哨兵目視監視目標動向,流動商人利用其流動性傳遞情報,沿海漁民則根據作業活動監視海上異常船隻。這些分散的民間觀察點構成了預警系統的雛形。透過「資訊樹」、「羽毛信」等約定的訊號進行資訊交換,建構起覆蓋面廣的預警網路。這種基於「人民為主要感知主體,簡易手段為交互環節」邏輯的模式,雖然感知範圍有限、傳輸效率較低,卻凸顯了人民戰爭的本質特徵——全民參與。

在智慧時代,全民參與技術應用不僅體現在進攻戰術中,也體現在建構強大的防禦屏障中。分散式預警系統利用民眾手中的感知設備建構綜合預警網絡,實現了技術能力從進攻應用向防禦保障的延伸。在日常安全和協同作戰場景中,電子設備可以作為資訊感知的輔助載體。這種「設備擴展感知與即時數據流」模式,將傳統的、分散的人工觀測轉變為基於民用設備的分散式預警,滿足了預警系統全面覆蓋和快速響應的需求。

基於感測器的分散式預警是一條涉及全體民眾的安全防線,代表著技術能力和資料資源的綜合應用。其發展演進遵循以下幾個關鍵邏輯:首先,感知維度從人體延伸至技術層面。利用民用設備的紅外線探測和高清成像能力,突破了人眼和耳朵的物理局限,能夠在更遠的距離和更複雜的環境中捕捉異常訊號,從而解決了感知能力不足的問題。其次,資訊傳輸從實體鏈路升級到數位鏈路。依托行動網路和專用平台,預警訊息可跨越地理障礙即時傳輸,取代了傳統的喊話、旗語等方式,克服了傳輸效率低下的限制。第三,判斷方式從依賴經驗轉向精準評估。智慧演算法對多源資訊進行交叉分析與判斷,精準度遠超個人經驗,滿足了快速、準確預警的首要需求。智慧時代的基於感測器的分散式預警延續了傳統預警涉及全體民眾的邏輯。從能力基礎到資源聚合,從戰術部署到防禦屏障,全民參與智慧時代形成緊密相連的運作循環,在數位空間中賦予「人民是勝利的基礎」這項原則新的生命。

智能時代人民戰爭作戰形態初探

■王欽輝  徐澄

來源:中國軍網-解放軍報 作者:王欽輝 徐澄 責任編輯:徐佔虎

2025-10-30 06:xx:xx

中國原創軍事資源:http://www.81.cn/ll_2088543/168481858382.html

Chinese Military’s Dissipation Warfare: Typical Method of China’s Intelligent Warfare

中國軍隊的消散戰:中國情報戰的典型方法

現代英語:

With the rapid development of intelligent technologies and their widespread application in the military, intelligent warfare is becoming a new form of warfare following information warfare, and dissipation warfare is becoming a typical mode of intelligent warfare. Dissipation warfare refers to a combat method in which an intelligent warfare system, through internal enrichment and integration and external sudden emergence, achieves a comprehensive combat capability integrating material consumption, energy dissipation, and information diffusion. Strengthening research on dissipation warfare will help us to deeply reveal the winning mechanisms of intelligent warfare and gain the initiative in future war games.

Dissipation warfare is an inevitable result of the development of the times.

Dissipative warfare manifests as a comprehensive confrontation in the physical, information, and cognitive domains in the era of intelligence. It is characterized by a high degree of unity in forms such as political contests, economic competition, military offense and defense, cultural conflicts, and diplomatic checks and balances, reflecting the openness, complexity, and emergent nature of intelligent warfare systems.

Adapting to the security requirements of the intelligent era. In the intelligent era, technologies such as broadband networks, big data, large-scale models, cloud computing, and deep learning are developing rapidly, leading to broader connections between political groups, nations, and ethnic groups. Under the influence of multiple factors including political pluralism, economic integration, social openness, and technological revolution, non-traditional security is emerging and intertwined with traditional threats. The subjects and scope of intelligent warfare are constantly expanding, and the time and space of warfare are continuously extending. War and peace are inextricably linked, and the warfare system will further transcend local geographical limitations, moving from relative closure to greater openness, forming a higher level and wider-ranging confrontation. Dissipative warfare emphasizes the comprehensive exertion of intelligent warfare systems in the physical, information, and cognitive domains, highly unifying political contests, economic competition, military offense and defense, cultural conflicts, and diplomatic checks and balances within the scope of adversarial confrontation, thus adapting to the demands of the evolving global security landscape.

This aligns with the objective laws governing the evolution of warfare. The dissipative phenomenon in warfare has existed since the inception of war; however, before the emergence of intelligent warfare, due to technological limitations, it remained in a relatively rudimentary and simple state, with warfare manifesting only in one of the following forms: material consumption, energy dissipation, or information diffusion. In the agricultural era, warfare was primarily characterized by material-driven, human-centered cold weapon warfare. In the industrial era, warfare was primarily characterized by energy-driven, platform-centered thermonuclear and mechanized warfare. In the information age, warfare is primarily characterized by information-driven, network-based information warfare. Entering the intelligent era, intelligent technology highly unifies the cognitive, decision-making, and operational advantages in adversarial confrontation. Essentially, it highly unifies matter, energy, and information, forming an intelligent warfare model dominated by intelligent elements and centered on intelligent algorithms through intelligent empowerment, intelligent energy aggregation, and intelligent energy release. Its main manifestation is dissipative warfare, reflecting the complex systemic confrontation of intelligent warfare.

It possesses a solid philosophical theoretical foundation. Social forms are the matrix of war forms. Exploring and understanding intelligent warfare must be based on the fundamental principles of historical materialism and dialectical materialism, comprehensively examining the evolution of war forms and the social forms in which intelligent warfare exists, and constructing a new concept and contextual system of warfare. From a philosophical perspective, matter, energy, and information are the three major elements constituting the world. Matter embodies the existence of origin, energy embodies the existence of motion, and information embodies the existence of connection. These three progressively and alternately dominate the evolution and operation of social and war forms. According to the principle of negation of negation in dialectical materialism, in the intelligent era following the information age, the dominant element of society will once again be matter, after matter, energy, and information. However, this matter will be a new type of matter formed through a spiral ascent after high informatization, and its main characteristic is the possession of intelligent technological attributes. Therefore, in essence, dissipative warfare is the high degree of unification of the characteristic advantages of matter, energy, and information in previous low-level war forms by intelligent elements, and the high degree of unification of the forms of material consumption, energy dissipation, and information diffusion that are common in warfare, reflecting the typical characteristics of intelligent warfare.

Deeply grasp the intrinsic essence of dissipation warfare

Dissipation warfare is based on the real world but encompasses the virtual world. It adapts to the rapid development of intelligent technology, the rise of non-traditional security threats, and the continuous expansion of the subjects and scope of warfare, thus exhibiting many new characteristics.

Comprehensive Game of Confrontation. As intelligent warfare accelerates its development to greater depth and breadth, the interconnections and influences across political, economic, cultural, and diplomatic fields are becoming more extensive. The focus of war is shifting from the military system to the social system. The confrontation between stakeholders will manifest as a comprehensive game involving political contests, economic competition, military offense and defense, cultural conflicts, and diplomatic checks and balances. The pursuit of war advantage is no longer limited to the realm of military confrontation. The victorious side must adapt to the openness, complexity, and emergent nature of the war system, shifting from the extensive consumption and application of single materials, energy, and information to a dissipative approach dominated by intelligent advantages, striving to gain the initiative and advantage in comprehensive games across multiple domains.

The actors in intelligent warfare are becoming increasingly diverse and multi-domain. The potential forces mobilized in traditional warfare will be in a state of constant confrontation. Political forces, various institutions and personnel, along with the troops and soldiers who fight on the battlefield in the traditional sense, constitute the main actors in war. This diversified range of actors will transcend the real and virtual domains, appearing in multiple spatial domains such as land, sea, air, space, cyberspace, and psychology, encompassing the physical, information, and cognitive domains, and covering various social domains including politics, economics, culture, and diplomacy. For example, civilians can use smartphones to collect information from the military battlefield and transmit it to stakeholders, causing the dissemination of key war information and thus influencing war decisions or the outcome of a campaign or battle.

Power integration and aggregation. Virtual and virtual forces are integrated. Around the war’s objectives, all potentially usable real and virtual forces will be integrated with intelligent technology, performing their duties and acting according to regulations on parallel battlefields; unmanned and manned forces are integrated. After undergoing stages of manual operation, authorization, and supervision, unmanned combat forces will achieve a high degree of autonomy and can be deployed and combined with various manned forces as needed, effectively coordinating and coexisting under common war rules; multiple forces are integrated. Based on extensive connections across various fields and the common objectives of the war system, various forces, including the Party, government, military, police, and civilians, will closely coordinate military operations with political, economic, diplomatic, public opinion, and legal struggles, forming comprehensive combat power. In short, under the unified planning of a nation or political group, although the diverse participating forces in intelligent warfare are physically dispersed, they can achieve logical concentration, immediate aggregation, complementary advantages, and integrated strengths around a common war objective.

The cumulative effect of warfare is emerging. While advanced warfare features new technological characteristics, it still retains the advantages and characteristics of lower-level warfare. Dissipative warfare emphasizes continuous, comprehensive confrontation across multiple domains. This includes the depletion of ammunition, supplies, equipment, and even personnel at the material level; the continuous accumulation and release of energy at the energy level; and the immeasurable impact on human thinking, values, moral concepts, emotions, and behavioral patterns through the diffusion and integration of data, knowledge, and algorithms at the information level. Under the constant deterrence of nuclear weapons, intelligent warfare is showing a decrease in brutality, but political isolation, economic blockade, cultural conflict, and diplomatic suppression will become more severe and intense. When the various systems—military, political, economic, cultural, and diplomatic—continue to function effectively, and the cumulative effect reaches a certain level, the warfare system will increase its negative entropy, leading to a sudden leap in combat power and the emergence of systemic effectiveness, thereby gaining a wartime advantage.

Choose the right focus of the battle and wage a war of attrition.

Intelligent warfare systems achieve maximum system combat effectiveness through internal enrichment and integration, external emergence of sudden changes, cross-domain efficiency enhancement, and intelligent dissipation. This is the winning mechanism inherent in dissipation warfare. To gain the upper hand in intelligent warfare, it is essential to clarify the operational focus of dissipation warfare, target the weaknesses and shortcomings of the opponent’s system, and accurately identify the key points for war preparation.

Focusing on the openness of the system, the strategy aims to isolate and close off the opponent’s war system. This involves cutting off the material, energy, and information exchange between the opponent’s war system and the external battlefield environment, depriving it of these sources of resources and gradually leading it towards isolation, closure, and weakness. At the strategic level, political isolation can be employed to isolate the opponent’s war system, causing an increase in system entropy. At the operational level, methods such as cutting off data sources, destroying data backups, falsifying data, and altering information can be used, employing a combination of hard and soft tactics to force its war system towards a closed state, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the opponent’s system.

Focusing on the complexity of the system, attacks can be launched at different domains to disrupt the opponent’s war system. The more interconnected and tightly linked the elements of an intelligent warfare system, the lower its structural reliability. By applying the principle that each layer in a complex system is relatively independent, strategic, operational, and tactical action plans can be formulated to achieve layered and domain-specific disruption of the enemy’s war system. For example, at the strategic level, economic blockade can be used to significantly weaken the opponent’s war power and development potential. At the operational level, the vulnerability of the combat system’s communication network can be exploited, using a combination of cyber and electronic warfare attacks as the basic path and means, employing methods such as “destroying endpoints, attacking elements, isolating clusters, disabling networks, and breaking through cloud infrastructure” to disrupt the opponent’s combat system structure and cause its war system to “collapse.”

Focusing on systemic emergent effects, the goal is to dismantle and disperse the adversary’s war system. Intelligent warfare systems can only rapidly form and exert their systemic effectiveness, gaining a dissipative advantage, if only individual components or elements function. It is impossible for an advantage to emerge if only a single component or element is active. It is foreseeable that emerging technologies such as ChatGPT, and more advanced intelligent technologies in the future, will provide new ways of thinking about understanding and discovering the complex operational behavior, states, and patterns of war systems, as well as new means of exploring objective laws and transforming nature and society. The dominant party in a war confrontation will reduce the coupling degree of the adversary’s war system through a combination of virtual and real, parallel and integrated confrontation methods, achieving the goal of dismantling and dispersing the enemy’s war system.

現代國語:

隨著智慧科技的快速發展及其在軍事領域的廣泛應用,繼資訊戰之後,智慧戰正成為一種新型戰爭形式,而耗散戰則成為智慧戰的典型模式。耗散戰是指智慧戰系統透過內部的強化整合和外在的突現,實現物質消耗、能量耗散和資訊擴散三者融合的綜合作戰能力。加強耗散戰的研究,有助於我們深入揭示智慧戰的勝利機制,並在未來的戰爭賽局中掌握主動權。

耗散戰是時代發展的必然產物。

在智慧時代,耗散戰表現為在物質、資訊和認知領域展開的全面對抗。它具有高度統一性的特點,涵蓋政治博弈、經濟競爭、軍事攻防、文化衝突、外交制衡等多個面向,體現了智慧戰系統的開放性、複雜性和湧現性。

適應智慧時代的安全需求。在智慧時代,寬頻網路、大數據、大規模模式、雲端運算、深度學習等技術快速發展,使得政治群體、國家和民族之間的聯繫日益緊密。在政治多元化、經濟整合、社會開放和技術革命等多重因素的影響下,非傳統安全正在興起,並與傳統威脅交織在一起。智能戰的主體和範圍不斷擴大,戰爭的時空也不斷延伸。戰爭與和平密不可分,戰爭體系將進一步超越地域限制,從相對封閉走向更開放,形成更高層次、更廣泛範圍的對抗。耗散型戰爭強調智慧戰系統在物理、資訊和認知領域的綜合運用,將政治博弈、經濟競爭、軍事攻防、文化衝突以及外交制衡等因素高度整合到對抗的範疇內,從而適應不斷演變的全球安全格局。

這與支配戰爭演化的客觀法則相符。戰爭中的耗散現象自戰爭誕生之初便已存在;然而,在智能戰爭出現之前,由於技術限制,戰爭仍處於相對原始和簡單的狀態,僅以物質消耗、能量耗散或信息擴散三種形式之一表現出來。在農業時代,戰爭主要以物質驅動、以人為中心的冷兵器戰爭為特徵。在工業時代,戰爭主要以能量驅動、以平台為中心的核戰和機械化戰爭為特徵。在資訊時代,戰爭主要以資訊驅動、網路為基礎的資訊戰為特徵。進入智慧時代,智慧科技高度整合了對抗中的認知、決策和作戰優勢。本質上,它高度整合了物質、能量和訊息,透過智慧賦能、智慧能量聚合和智慧能量釋放,形成以智慧元素為主導、以智慧演算法為中心的智慧戰爭模式。其主要表現形式是耗散型戰爭,反映了智慧戰爭複雜的系統性對抗。

它擁有堅實的哲學理論基礎。社會形態是戰爭形態的母體。探索和理解智能戰爭必須立足於歷史唯物主義和辯證唯物主義的基本原則,全面考察戰爭形態的演變以及智能戰爭存在的社會形態,並建構新的戰爭概念和語境體系。從哲學角度來看,物質、能量和資訊是構成世界的三大要素。物質體現了起源的存在,能量體現了運動的存在,訊息體現了連結的存在。這三者交替地、漸進地主導著社會形態和戰爭形態的演變和運作。根據辯證唯物論的否定之否定原則,在資訊時代之後的智慧時代,社會的主導要素將再次是物質,其次才是物質、能量和資訊。然而,這種物質將是高度資訊化後透過螺旋上升形成的新型物質,其主要特徵是擁有智慧技術屬性。因此,本質上,耗散戰是將以往低層次戰爭形式中物質、能量和資訊方面的特徵優勢,透過智慧要素進行高度統一,並將戰爭中常見的物質消耗、能量耗散和資訊擴散形式進行高度統一,從而體現了智慧戰的典型特徵。

深刻把握耗散戰的內在本質

耗散戰立足現實世界,卻涵蓋虛擬世界。它適應了智慧技術的快速發展、非傳統安全威脅的出現以及戰爭主體和範圍的不斷擴大,因此呈現出許多新特徵。

全面對抗博弈。隨著智慧戰加速發展,其在政治、經濟、文化和外交領域的相互連結和影響日益廣泛。戰爭的焦點正從軍事體系轉向社會體系。各利益相關者之間的對抗將演變為一場涵蓋政治博弈、經濟競爭、軍事攻防、文化衝突以及外交制衡的綜合性博弈。戰爭優勢的爭奪不再侷限於軍事對抗領域。勝利方必須適應戰爭體系的開放性、複雜性和湧現性,從大規模消耗和應用單一物質、能源和資訊轉向以智慧優勢為主導的耗散式策略,力求在跨領域的綜合性博弈中取得主動權和優勢。

智慧戰爭中的行動者日益多元化和跨領域。傳統戰爭中動員的潛在力量將處於持續對抗狀態。政治力量、各類機構和人員,以及在傳統意義上戰場上作戰的部隊和士兵,構成了戰爭的主要行動者。這種多元化的行動主體將超越現實與虛擬的界限,出現在陸地、海洋、空中、太空、網路空間和心理等多個空間領域,涵蓋物理、資訊和認知領域,並涉及政治、經濟、文化和外交等各種社會領域。例如,平民可以使用智慧型手機從軍事戰場收集資訊並將其傳遞給利益相關者,從而傳播關鍵戰爭訊息,進而影響戰爭決策或戰役/戰鬥的結果。

力量整合與聚合。虛擬與虛擬力量融合。圍繞著戰爭目標,所有潛在可用的現實和虛擬力量都將透過智慧技術進行整合,在平行戰場上履行職責並按照既定規則行動;無人與有人力量融合。經過人工操作、授權和監督階段後,無人作戰力量將達到高度自主,並可根據需要部署並與各種有人力量協同作戰,在共同的戰爭規則下有效協調共存;多兵種力量融合。基於跨領域的廣泛聯繫和戰爭體系的共同目標,包括黨、政府、軍隊、警察和民眾在內的各方力量將緊密協調軍事行動與政治、經濟、外交、輿論和法律鬥爭,形成綜合戰鬥力。簡而言之,在一個國家或政治集團的統一規劃下,儘管參與智能戰的各方力量在物理上分散,但可以圍繞共同的戰爭目標實現邏輯集中、即時聚合、優勢互補和力量整合。

戰爭的累積效應正在顯現。先進戰爭雖然具有新的技術特徵,但仍保留了低層次戰爭的優點和特徵。耗散型戰爭強調跨多個領域的持續、全面對抗。這包括物質層面的彈藥、補給、裝備乃至人員的消耗;能量層面的能量的持續累積和釋放;以及透過數據、知識和演算法的擴散和整合,對人類思維、價值觀、道德觀念、情感和行為模式產生不可估量的影響。在核武持續嚇阻下,情報戰的殘酷性降低,但政治孤立、經濟封鎖、文化衝突和外交壓制將變得更加嚴重和激烈。當各種體系——軍事、政治、經濟、文化和外交——都受到影響時,情況可能會變得更加複雜。外交手段-持續有效運作,累積效應達到某一水準後,戰爭系統會增加其負熵,導致戰鬥力突飛猛進,系統效能湧現,進而獲得戰時優勢。

選擇正確的作戰重點,進行消耗戰。

智慧戰系統透過內部的豐富與整合、外在突發的變化、跨域效能的提升、智慧化的消散,實現系統作戰效能的最大化。這是消散戰固有的致勝機制。要在智慧戰中取得優勢,關鍵在於明確消散戰的作戰重點,找出對手系統的弱點和不足,並準確地辨識備戰的關鍵點。

以系統開放性為核心,該戰略旨在孤立和封閉對手的戰爭系統。這包括切斷敵方戰爭系統與外部戰場環境之間的物質、能源和資訊交換,剝奪其資源來源,並逐步使其走向孤立、封閉和虛弱。在戰略層面,可採用政治孤立來孤立敵方戰爭系統,進而增加系統熵。在作戰層面,可採用切斷資料來源、銷毀資料備份、竄改資料和資訊等方法,結合軟硬戰術,迫使敵方戰爭系統走向封閉狀態,進而降低其作戰效能。

考慮到系統的複雜性,可以從不同領域發動攻擊來擾亂敵方戰爭系統。智慧戰系統的各個組成部分之間的聯繫越緊密,其結構可靠性就越低。基於複雜系統中每一層相對獨立的原則,可以製定戰略、作戰和戰術行動計劃,實現對敵方戰爭系統的分層和領域性破壞。例如,在戰略層面,經濟封鎖可以顯著削弱對手的戰爭力量和發展潛力。在作戰層面,可以利用作戰系統通訊網路的脆弱性,以網路戰和電子戰結合的方式作為基本路徑和手段,採用「摧毀終端、攻擊單元、隔離集群、癱瘓網路、突破雲端基礎設施」等方法,破壞對手的作戰系統結構,使其戰爭系統「崩潰」。

著眼於系統性湧現效應,目標是瓦解和分散對手的戰爭系統。智慧戰系統只有在各個組成部分或單元發揮作用時,才能迅速形成並發揮其係統效能,獲得分散優勢。如果只有單一組成部分或單元處於活動狀態,則不可能產生優勢。可以預見,諸如ChatGPT等新興技術以及未來更先進的智慧技術,將為理解和發現戰爭系統複雜的運作行為、狀態和模式提供新的思路,並為探索客觀規律、改造自然和社會提供新的途徑。戰爭對抗中的主導者將透過虛擬與現實、並行與一體化對抗方式,降低敵方戰爭系統的耦合度,從而達到瓦解和瓦解敵方戰爭系統的目標。

資料來源: 中國軍網-解放軍報 作者:王榮輝 責任編輯:郭妍菲
2023-05-09 07:xx:xx

中國原創軍事資源:http://www.81.cn/ll_20854883/1622287889.html