Category Archives: #Network #Centric #Warfare

Chinese Military Exclusive Requirements for Strategies & Tactics of People’s War in The New Era

新時代中國軍隊對人民戰爭戰略戰術的獨特要求

現代英語:

Looking back on its glorious combat history, the People’s Army has consistently adhered to the absolute leadership of the Party, proposing and implementing a comprehensive set of strategies and tactics for people’s war. These strategies and tactics are a crucial weapon for the People’s Army to defeat the strong with the weak and to conquer the enemy. Over the past 98 years, with the changing times and evolving forms of warfare, the specific content and manifestations of the strategies and tactics for people’s war have continuously evolved. To confront the challenges of information-based and intelligent warfare, we must firmly grasp the essential requirements and value orientations of the strategies and tactics for people’s war amidst the rapidly evolving global trends and practices, unifying the inherently unchanging laws of conduct with the external realities of change, and continuously innovating and developing the strategies and tactics for people’s war in the new era.

President Xi Jinping emphasized that no matter how the situation develops, the magic weapon of people’s war must never be lost. However, we must grasp the new characteristics and new requirements of people’s war in the new era, innovate its content, methods and approaches, and unleash its overall power. Currently, facing profound challenges brought about by changes in science and technology, warfare, and our adversaries, we must not only inherit and carry forward the fine traditions of people’s war, but also be sensitive to changes, actively respond to them, and proactively seek change. We must accurately grasp the inherent requirements of the strategies and tactics of people’s war in the new era, consciously update our thinking and concepts, and innovate strategic guidance, so that this magic weapon of defeating the enemy can be demonstrated on future battlefields.

Adhere to relying on the people and deeply rooted

In the long practice of revolutionary war, the people are the most profound force for victory. The people are the primary force behind the strategies and tactics of people’s war, a magic weapon for victory. People’s war has its roots deeply rooted in the people, and its confidence comes from the people. Regardless of how the times change or how the war evolves, relying closely on the people and fully mobilizing them will always be the fundamental condition and the only way to carry out people’s war. Developing the strategies and tactics of people’s war in the new era requires adhering to the mass perspective of history and the fundamental requirement that soldiers and civilians are the foundation of victory. We must integrate the traditional strategic advantages of people’s war with the mass line, broaden the sources of vitality for the strategies and tactics of people’s war, draw strategic wisdom and tactical methods from the people, and develop an intellectual advantage for people’s war in the new era. We must solidly carry out national defense education throughout the nation, continuously foster a strong sense of patriotism, inspire patriotism, strengthen awareness of potential dangers, and enhance national defense awareness. We must guide the masses to actively care about and support national defense, thereby infusing powerful spiritual strength into people’s war in the new era. We must focus on promoting high-quality population development, comprehensively improve the cultural, scientific, and innovative qualities of the entire population, accelerate the development of a modern human resource base of high quality, sufficient in volume, optimized in structure, and rationally distributed, and promote the shift of the dominant force in people’s war from quantitative to qualitative. Further improve the national defense mobilization system and mechanism, promote the establishment of a rapid response system that is connected with the national emergency response mechanism and integrated with the joint combat system, fully tap and gather the unlimited war potential contained in the people, and give full play to the resource aggregation and value-added effect.

Focus on overall planning and full-area offense and defense

In the long-term practice of revolutionary warfare, the strategies and tactics of people’s war require the comprehensive mobilization of diverse forces and resources in the political, economic, cultural, diplomatic, and military sectors, and the integrated use of various forms of struggle and methods of operation. This holistic approach compensates for local deficiencies and disadvantages, ultimately defeating powerful adversaries. Modern warfare is not only a fierce confrontation in the military sphere, but also a comprehensive struggle in the political, economic, and diplomatic spheres, exhibiting the distinct characteristics of hybrid warfare. To develop the strategies and tactics of people’s war in the new era, we must establish a broad systemic mindset, relying on the national strategic system and supported by the joint operations system, explore the implementation methods of people’s war strategies and tactics, and win the total war of people’s war in the new era. We should fully leverage the advantages of the new national system, relying on the integrated national strategic system and capabilities, efficiently aggregate superior resources across the board, fully activate the country’s national defense potential, and weave various forces and resources into a network. We should integrate and plan the subsystems of people’s war, including leadership, organization, personnel, command, technology, equipment, and support, to maximize the effectiveness of holistic linkage and systemic operation, and achieve the maximum benefits of all-round effort and multiplied energy. We must strengthen comprehensive coordination across the physical, information, and social domains, focusing on seeking breakthroughs in new domains and new qualities, and making achievements in new dimensions such as unmanned warfare, human-machine collaborative warfare, network and electronic warfare, space and deep-sea warfare, and intelligent and autonomous warfare. Military and non-military means must be coordinated, integrating various forms of struggle, including political, economic, diplomatic, public opinion, and military. Comprehensive measures must be implemented to effectively wage diplomatic offensive and defensive battles, financial and trade battles, psychological defense battles, and public opinion and legal battles. We must leverage the combined effectiveness of political offensives and armed strikes to effectively fight the political and military battles.

Strengthen active defense and take the initiative

Through the long practice of revolutionary warfare, the People’s Army has developed a comprehensive strategic philosophy of active defense, emphasizing, for example, the unity of strategic defense and offensive action in campaigns and battles, the principles of defense, self-defense, and preemptive strike, and the principle of “if no one offends me, I will not offend; if someone offends me, I will certainly offend.” Active defense is fundamentally defensive, its essence lies in activeness, and its inherent characteristic is proactiveness. Currently, profound changes have taken place in the international, national, and Party, military, and political landscapes. The strategies and tactics of people’s war in the new era generally adhere to the fundamental principle of defense and are not aimed at hegemony, aggression, or oppression of other countries. Consequently, they will win the support and endorsement of the vast majority of the Chinese people, as well as the understanding and assistance of peace-loving and justice-loving countries and peoples around the world. Developing the strategies and tactics of people’s war in the new era must adapt to the times and circumstances. We must adhere to a defensive national defense policy, implement the military strategic guidelines of the new era, excel at observing and analyzing issues from a political perspective, and be adept at considering and applying strategies from regional and global perspectives to consolidate the political foundation for victory in people’s war. We must persist in neither provoking trouble nor fearing it, strengthen the regular and diversified use of military force, firmly and flexibly carry out military struggle, and while adhering to the strategic preemptive strike, we must not give up campaign and combat offensives under favorable conditions and when necessary. We must advance steadily, make progress within stability, and be proactive within stability, effectively shape the security situation, contain crises and conflicts, and firmly grasp the initiative in the struggle.

Highlight new quality dominance and technological empowerment

In the long practice of revolutionary warfare, while emphasizing that victory in war is primarily determined by people, not objects, the People’s Army has also placed great emphasis on the research and development of advanced military technology, particularly weaponry. Comrade Mao Zedong once emphasized that without modern equipment, it would be impossible to defeat the armies of imperialism. The technological content of modern warfare has undergone a qualitative leap, with advanced technologies and new weaponry such as artificial intelligence, big data, quantum computing, unmanned aerial vehicles, and brain control being widely applied in the military. While the people remain the decisive force in determining victory in war, the manifestation of this power has undergone significant changes. Science and technology are core combat power, and People’s War will place greater emphasis on the application of scientific and technological means and rely even more heavily on the wisdom and creativity of the people. Developing the strategies and tactics of People’s War in the new era should prioritize winning information-based and intelligent warfare. We should deeply study the essential characteristics, winning mechanisms, and strategies and tactics of high-end warfare, accelerate the shift from “winning by numbers” to “winning by talent,” and from “winning by manpower” to “winning by intelligence,” effectively enhance our ability to win through scientific and technological empowerment and digital intelligence, and truly unleash the crucial role of science and technology and talent in People’s War in the new era. We will accelerate the development of high-tech industries, vigorously strengthen the construction of new forces in new domains such as ocean, space, cyberspace, artificial intelligence, and quantum technology, increase military-civilian collaboration in high-tech fields, accelerate the transformation and application of new productive forces into new combat capabilities, and promote the expansion of war potential reserves into emerging fields and the focus on new forces. We will integrate and coordinate military and civilian scientific and technological advantages, shifting the focus from traditional support and guarantee elements such as human and material resources to new support and guarantee elements such as information, technology, and intelligence. We will build information, resource, and technology pools with profound foundations and rich reserves, actively cultivate capable, strong, and professional professional support units, and continuously expand the breadth and depth of people’s participation in the war and scientific and technological support.

Emphasis on flexibility, maneuverability, innovation and checks and balances

In the long-term practice of revolutionary warfare, the strategies and tactics of People’s War are highly flexible and maneuverable. Their most essential requirement is to prioritize self-reliance, attacking the enemy without being attacked by them. Based on the actual situation of both sides, we fight the battles based on our weapons, against the enemy, and at the right time and place. We identify the enemy’s weaknesses and vulnerabilities, leverage our strengths and advantages, and defeat the enemy with our own strengths, always seizing the initiative on the battlefield. Flexible and maneuverable strategies and tactics are the magic weapon for defeating an enemy with superior equipment with inferior equipment. “You fight yours, I fight mine” is a summary and generalization of the long-term experience of China’s revolutionary war and the soul and essence of the strategies and tactics of People’s War. Developing the strategies and tactics of People’s War in the new era must grasp the methodological requirements of asymmetric checks and balances, leverage innovative operational concepts, adhere to the mechanisms of victory in modern warfare, and continuously develop practical and effective tactics to defeat the enemy. We must proceed from the actual circumstances of both sides, gaining a deep understanding of operational missions, adversaries, and the evolving operational environment. We must thoroughly grasp the concepts, elements, and methods of victory, objectively analyze and study the strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages of both sides, know the enemy and ourselves, adapt to the situation, and flexibly utilize various combat forces and methods, striving to achieve maximum results at the lowest cost. We must adhere to the principle of “attacking the enemy without being attacked by them,” capitalize on strengths and avoid weaknesses, avoid the real and attack the weak, attack where the enemy is least prepared, and attack where they must be defended. We must proactively create opportunities, flexibly maneuver the enemy, and fight wherever we are most advantageous and wherever we are most skilled. We must adhere to the principle of “using what we can to defeat what we cannot,” advancing the research and application of military theory, operational guidance, tactics, and training methods in a timely manner, innovating core operational concepts, and developing new types of combat methods. We must fight against the enemy’s tactics, targeting their weaknesses, and leveraging our military’s strengths, thus creating new winning advantages in people’s war through asymmetric checks and balances.

Emphasis on accumulating small things into big things and focusing on unity of purpose

Throughout the long practice of revolutionary warfare, our army has been at an overall disadvantage for considerable periods. Therefore, the strategies and tactics of people’s war emphasize leveraging strength against weakness locally, persisting in accumulating small victories into larger ones, and concentrating forces to wage annihilation campaigns. This has become a key strategy for the people’s army to defeat powerful foes. Compared to previous eras, modern warfare often unfolds across multiple dimensions and domains, providing greater scope for implementing this strategy of “accumulating small victories into larger ones.” Developing the strategies and tactics of people’s war in the new era requires strengthening the concept of “dispersed in appearance, yet focused in spirit; dispersed in form, yet united in strength.” This involves dynamically consolidating and uniting the numerous combat forces distributed across the multidimensional battlefield. Through the fusion of capabilities and immediate optimization, we can launch rapid localized focused-energy attacks, wide-area guerrilla harassment, and deliver annihilating and destructive strikes against key enemy locations. This not only creates a hammering effect, but also continuously wears down the enemy, gradually depriving them of the initiative on the battlefield. This highly integrated distributed warfare emphasizes the wide-area dispersion of troop deployment and the discrete distribution of capabilities. Based on the needs of achieving operational intent, objectives, and missions, it prioritizes the best operational elements, units, and forces. Through the integration of operational capabilities and the accumulation of operational impacts, it aggregates optimal operational effects, unleashes maximum operational potential, maximizes operational effectiveness, and achieves optimal operational results. This distributed warfare has evolved from “geographical dispersion” to “dynamic coupling across all domains and dimensions”: no longer limited to the physical dispersion of personnel and equipment, it extends to multi-dimensional battlefields such as cyber, electromagnetic, and cognitive. Relying on data links, artificial intelligence, and distributed command systems to achieve cross-domain collaboration, it significantly enhances battlefield survivability and multiplies strike effectiveness.

現代國語:

編者按

回望輝煌戰鬥歷程,人民軍隊始終堅持在黨的絕對領導下,提出並實施了一整套人民戰爭戰略戰術,這是人民軍隊以弱勝強、克敵制勝的重要法寶。 98年來,隨著時代變遷和戰爭形態演變,人民戰爭戰略戰術的具體內容和表現形式不斷發展變化。直面資訊化智慧化戰爭挑戰,我們要在快速變化發展的世界大勢和實踐樣態中,牢牢把握人民戰爭戰略戰術的本質要求和價值取向,把內在不變的規律性特徵與外在變化的現實性特徵統一起來,不斷創新發展新時代人民戰爭戰略戰術。

習主席強調指出,無論形勢如何發展,人民戰爭這個法寶永遠不能丟,但要把握新的時代條件下人民戰爭的新特點新要求,創新內容和方式方法,充分發揮人民戰爭的整體威力。當前,面對科技之變、戰爭之變、對手之變帶來的深刻挑戰,我們既要繼承發揚人民戰爭優良傳統,也要敏銳識變、積極應變、主動求變,準確把握新時代人民戰爭戰略戰術內在要求,自覺更新思維理念,創新戰略指導,讓克敵制勝的法寶顯威未來戰場。

堅持依靠人民、深根基

在長期革命戰爭實踐中,人民群眾是戰爭勝利最深厚的偉力。人民戰爭戰略戰術,人民是構成這一制勝法寶的主體,人民戰爭的根基深植於人民、底氣來自於人民,無論時代如何發展、戰爭如何演進,緊緊依靠人民、充分動員群眾,永遠是開展人民戰爭的基礎條件和不二法門。新時代條件下發展人民戰爭戰略戰術,必須堅持群眾史觀和兵民是勝利之本的根本要求,把人民戰爭的傳統謀略優勢和群眾路線結合起來,拓展人民戰爭戰略戰術的源頭活水,從人民群眾中汲取戰略智慧和策略方法,形成新時代人民戰爭的智力優勢。札實開展全民防衛教育,不斷厚植家國情懷,激發愛國動力,強化憂患意識,增強國防觀念,引導廣大群眾主動關心國防事業、支持國防建設,為新時代人民戰爭注入強大精神力量。聚力推進人口高品質發展,全面提升全民文化素質、科技素質和創新能力,加速塑造素質優良、總量充裕、結構優化、分佈合理的現代化人力資源,推動人民戰爭主體由數量優勢向質量優勢轉變。進一步完善國防動員體制機制,推動建立與國家應急響應機制相銜接、與聯合作戰體系相融合的快速響應制度,把內含於人民群眾中的無限戰爭潛力充分挖掘出來、聚攏起來,充分發揮資源集聚增值效應。

注重整體運籌、全域攻防

在長期革命戰爭實踐中,人民戰爭戰略戰術要求整體動員政治、經濟、文化、外交、軍事等多方面的力量資源,綜合運用多種鬥爭形式和作戰方式,以整體合力彌補局部的不足和劣勢,從而戰勝強大對手。現代戰爭既是軍事領域的激烈對抗,也是政治、經濟、外交等領域的全面角力,整體呈現混合戰爭的鮮明特徵。新時代條件下發展人民戰爭戰略戰術,必須確立大體系思維模式,以國家戰略體係為依托,以聯合作戰體係為支撐,探索人民戰爭戰略戰術的實現形式,打贏新時代人民戰爭總體戰。應充分發揮新型舉國體制優勢,依託一體化國家戰略體系與能力,高效能聚合全域優勢資源,全方位激活國家國防潛力,將各種力量資源擰線成繩、結繩成網,把人民戰爭的領導要素、組織要素、人員要素、指揮要素、技術要素、裝備要素、保障要素等分系統結合起來,統合、統合方式要加強物理域、資訊域、社會域等領域全面統籌,重點在新域新質上尋求突破,在無人作戰、人機協同作戰、網電作戰、太空深海作戰、智慧自主作戰等新維度有所作為。軍事與非軍事手段相互配合,把政治、經濟、外交、輿論和軍事鬥爭等多種形式結合起來,綜合施策著力打好外交攻防戰、金融貿易戰、心理防護戰、輿論法理戰等,發揮政治攻勢和武裝打擊的綜合效能,統籌打好政治軍事仗。

強化積極防禦、主動進取

在長期革命戰爭實踐中,人民軍隊形成了一整套積極防禦戰略思想,如堅持戰略上防禦與戰役戰斗上進攻的統一,堅持防禦、自衛、後發製人的原則,堅持“人不犯我,我不犯人;人若犯我,我必犯人”,等等。積極防禦,根本在防禦、要義在積極,主動進取是其內在特質。當前,世情國情黨情軍情發生深刻變化,新時代人民戰爭的戰略戰術在總體上堅持防禦性的根本原則,不以霸道霸權和侵略欺壓他國為目的,因此也會贏得國內最廣大人民群眾擁護和支持以及世界上愛好和平與正義的國家和人民的理解和幫助。新時代條件下發展人民戰爭戰略戰術,須應時而變、應勢而動。堅持奉行防禦性國防政策,貫徹落實新時代軍事戰略方針,善於從政治高度出發觀察和分析問題,善於從地區和全球視角來思考和運用策略,夯實人民戰爭制勝的政治基礎。堅持不惹事也不怕事,加強軍事力量常態化多樣化運用,堅定靈活開展軍事鬥爭,在堅持戰略上後發製人的同時,不放棄有利條件下和必要時的戰役戰鬥進攻,穩紮穩打、穩中有進、穩中有為,有效塑造安全態勢,遏止危機沖突,牢牢把握爭鬥主動權。

突顯新質主導、科技賦能

在長期革命戰爭實踐中,人民軍隊在強調決定戰爭勝負的主要因素是人而不是物的同時,同樣高度重視對先進軍事技術特別是武器裝備的研發。毛澤東同志就曾強調,沒有現代的裝備,要戰勝帝國主義的軍隊是不可能的。現代戰爭的科技含量發生了質的飛躍,人工智慧、大數據、量子計算、無人自主、腦控等高新技術與新型武器裝備廣泛應用於軍事領域。雖然人民群眾依然是戰爭勝負的決定性力量,但是這種力量的表現形式發生了重要變化。科技是核心戰鬥力,人民戰爭將更重視科技手段的運用,更依賴人民群眾的智慧和創造力。新時代條件下發展人民戰爭戰略戰術,應把打贏資訊化智能化戰爭作為戰爭準備的著眼點,深研高端戰爭的本質特徵、制勝機理、戰略戰法,加速推動從「人多製勝」向「人才制勝」、從「人力製勝」向「智力製勝」轉變,切實提高新科技賦能、數智者發揮勝利能力、數智性的科技人才、新人民主義中的關鍵人民發揮作用。加速推進高新產業發展,大力加強海洋、太空、網路空間、人工智慧、量子科技等新域新質力量建設,加大高新技術領域軍地協作力度,加速新質生產力向新質戰鬥力轉化運用,推動戰爭潛力儲備向新興領域拓展、向新質力量聚焦。聚合協同軍地科技優勢,由聚焦人力物力等傳統支撐保障要素向聚焦資訊、技術、智慧等新質支撐保障要素轉變,建設底蘊深厚、儲備豐富的資訊池、資源池、技術池,積極打造精幹強能、專業性強的專業支前分隊,不斷拓展人民參戰與科技支前的廣度與深度。

講究靈活機動、創新制衡

在長期革命戰爭實踐中,人民戰爭戰略戰術是高度靈活機動的戰略戰術,最本質的要求是堅持以我為主,致人而不致於人,根據敵我雙方的實際情況,有什麼武器打什麼仗,對什麼敵人打什麼仗,在什麼時間地點打什麼時間地點的仗,找準敵之弱點和軟肋,發揚我之長主動和優勢,能永遠不能掌握戰場。靈活機動的戰略戰術是以劣勢裝備戰勝優勢裝備之敵的致勝法寶。 “你打你的、我打我的”,是中國革命戰爭長期經驗的總結和概括,是人民戰爭戰略戰術的靈魂和精髓。新時代條件下發展人民戰爭戰略戰術,必須掌握非對稱制衡的方法論要求,以作戰概念創新為抓手,遵循現代戰爭制勝機理,不斷推出實用管用的克敵制勝招法。堅持一切從敵我雙方的實際情況出發,深刻洞悉作戰任務、作戰對手、作戰環境變化,深刻把握制勝觀念、制勝要素、制勝方式發展,客觀分析研究敵我雙方的強弱、優劣,知彼知己、因勢而變,靈活運用各種作戰力量和作戰方法,努力以最小代價取得最大戰果。堅持“致人而不致於人”,揚長避短、避實就虛,出其不趨、攻其必救,主動創造戰機,靈活調動敵人,怎麼有利就怎麼打,怎麼擅長就怎麼打。堅持“以能擊不能”,與時俱進推進軍事理論、作戰指導、戰法訓法研究運用,創新核心作戰概念,發展新質作戰手段,不按敵人套路打、盯著敵人軟肋打、發揮我軍優長打,在非對稱制衡中創造人民戰爭新的製勝優勢。

重視積小為大、神聚力合

在長期革命戰爭實踐中,我軍在相當長的時間內都是處於全局上的劣勢地位,所以人民戰爭戰略戰術重視局部上以強對弱,堅持積小勝為大勝,集中力量打殲滅戰,這成為人民軍隊戰勝強敵的關鍵一招。相較於以往,現代戰爭作戰往往在多維多域中展開,為實施「積小勝為大勝」提供了更加廣闊空間。新時代條件下發展人民戰爭戰略戰術,要強化「貌散而神聚,形散而力合」的理念,將分佈在多維戰場的諸多作戰力量動態集中聯合起來,通過效能融合、即時聚優,實施局部快速聚能攻擊、廣域遊擊襲擾,對敵分佈的要點實施殲這種神聚力合的分散式作戰更強調兵力部署廣域分散、能力狀態離散分佈,根據實現作戰企圖、達成作戰目的、遂行作戰任務需要,優選最佳作戰要素、單元、力量,通過作戰能力融合、行動作用累積,聚合最優作戰效應,激發最大作戰潛能,實現作戰效益最大化,達成最佳作戰效果。這種分散式作戰已經從「地理空間的分散」上升為「全局全維的動態耦合」:不再局限於人員裝備在物理空間的分散,而是拓展到網絡、電磁、認知等多維戰場;依託數據鏈、人工智能和分佈式指揮系統實現跨域協同,既極大提升了戰場生存力,又倍增了打擊效能。

中國原創軍事資源:http://www.81.cn/szb_223187/szbxq/index.html?paperName=jfjb&paperDate=2025-08-01&paperNumber=07&articleid=960384888

Chinese Military Research on US Army’s Network-Centric Warfare

中國軍方對美軍網路中心戰的研究

現代英語:

Several local wars in the 1990s showed that information networks play an increasingly important role in modern warfare, and the U.S. military’s combat mode began to change from platform-centric warfare to network-centric warfare. For example, in the Afghanistan War, the U.S. military’s digital and broadcast communication network connected various command posts, sensors, and shooters spread all over the country, allowing weapon platforms to play a greater role. Digital networks enable ” Predator ” drones to provide real-time target data and images to combat aircraft and guide combat aircraft to strike targets. This is a major development compared to the Kosovo War, when ” Predator ” drones were only used for information collection.

1  Overview of the US Army’s Network-Centric Warfare

1.1  Main Features of Network-Centric Warfare — Effects-Based

In the war in Afghanistan, the information network enabled an average of two targets to be attacked by one US Air Force aircraft when performing a single mission, while in the Gulf War in 1991 , an average of 10 aircraft were required to attack one target. This shows that network-centric warfare is not a platform-based operation, but an effect-based operation. Each weapon platform can attack multiple targets, rather than multiple weapon platforms attacking one target. Network-centric warfare realizes information sharing, and combat forces and their weapon platforms, including aircraft, armored vehicles, artillery, ships and even individual soldiers, are integrated regardless of their positions. The networking of sensor platforms, weapon platforms and command posts enables air or ground forces to use more accurate situational awareness information to attack targets more quickly, cooperate with each other and selectively, so the effect of network-centric warfare is that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. For example, a networked fighter must be superior to an equal number of non-networked fighters of the enemy, because each pilot of a networked fighter can not only see the images captured by the aircraft’s radar on the digital cockpit display, but also the images captured by the companion aircraft’s radar. The pilot of a non-networked fighter can only see the images captured by the aircraft’s radar.

1.2  Network-centric warfare environment – Global Information Grid

The U.S. military’s Joint Vision 2020 points out that the development of the Global Information Grid (GIG) concept will provide a network-centric environment that enables information to be distributed globally. The U.S. Department of Defense has begun developing GIG as a broadband network , including the development of space-based laser communication systems and land-based multi-channel fiber-optic networks. Space-based laser communication systems can connect aircraft and ground stations to military satellites, while land-based multi-channel fiber-optic networks are suitable for 100 different network entities, such as major national or regional military commands. In the future, GIG will consist of information grids related to computers and communications, sensor / reconnaissance grids related to space-based, air-based, land-based, sea-based and cyberspace sensors , and command and control grids related to initiating and controlling operations at all levels. In the next 10 years, the U.S. military will spend $ 5-10 billion on GIG construction. It is expected that in the next two years, it will cost $ 1 billion to build a land-based GIG infrastructure, which will become the basis of network-centric warfare; it will cost billions of dollars to build a UHF satellite system, which will expand the GIG infrastructure to all parts of the world. The development of GIG involves many new technologies, such as fiber multiplexing and space laser communication. In the U.S. defense budget for fiscal year 2003 , $ 2.5 billion will be spent on space laser communication technology, which is said to have the ability to provide fiber- quality broadband secure communications to U.S. forces operating anywhere, at any time.

1.3  The main obstacle to network-centric warfare : incompatibility

The widespread incompatibility between the U.S. military’s communications equipment and the architecture of related systems of various services is the main obstacle to the realization of the concept of full network-centric warfare. The Command, Control, Communications and Computers Directorate of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is responsible for overcoming this obstacle, one of the measures is to ensure that the systems purchased now are compatible with both the original systems and the future systems.

2  Research Progress of Network-Centric Warfare in the U.S. Military

2.1 US Navy Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) Network

The anti-jamming CEC system, centered on the Aegis ship , can connect air defense command and control systems, sensors, weapon platforms, and other nearby platforms. The CEC sensor grid provides the Navy with an overall picture of its forces. It can fuse target recognition and tracking data from a variety of airborne and shipborne sensors, greatly improving the Navy’s situational awareness and combat capabilities on the battlefield. The CEC combat grid uses fused data to locate missiles launched by air defense combat aircraft and ships, allowing them to intercept multiple incoming missiles at a safe distance from the combat group.  CEC is not only an important contribution to network-centric warfare, but also lays a good foundation for generating an integrated air picture between all theater forces. In April 2001 , the US Department of Defense approved the connection of CEC with the US Army’s Patriot air defense missile system. It is said that CEC can also be connected to the US Air Force’s early warning aircraft to provide seamless joint theater air defense capabilities. In addition, the US Navy also plans to establish a global naval Internet, an information grid that can collect, process and distribute battlefield data between naval forces around the world.

2.2  US Air Force Intelligent Tanker and Multi-mission Command and Control Aircraft

The US Air Force is implementing the Smart Tanker Program, which aims to develop the next generation of aerial refueling aircraft and make them serve as information receiving and relay nodes. Smart tankers are the best choice for realizing airborne Internet because they usually fly at high altitudes near the war zone, and this function can be realized after the installation of relevant electronic equipment. Through the information transmission device between data links, the tanker can seamlessly receive and send data between different systems, such as the Navy CEC system and the Army’s improved position determination reporting system. The smart tanker will be equipped with an electronic scanning array, thus becoming a long-range antenna for the ” Rivet ” joint electronic reconnaissance aircraft, collecting information from multiple locations in the war zone, and then forwarding the information to the ” Rivet ” joint electronic reconnaissance aircraft, which will be processed and distributed by the latter. The intelligence of the aerial refueling aircraft is mainly to install the ROBE communication terminal on the KC-135 tanker .  ROBE is an expandable modular airborne relay terminal that can be used for data relay to realize line-of-sight / beyond-line-of-sight communication between members in the network, such as communication between the commander of the air and space operations center and the commander of the war zone, or to provide important data to soldiers more quickly so as to make decisions quickly and strike time-sensitive targets. ROBE can also expand the communication range, so that all soldiers can share situational awareness information. In October 2002 , the U.S. Air Force successfully demonstrated the concept of smart tanker. A KC-135 tanker equipped with ROBE flew from Eglin Air Force Base to Hanscomo Air Force Base, successfully transmitting all tactical data from F-15 and ” Joint Star ” to the operations center of Hanscomo Air Force Base, and the staff reset the ROBE system from time to time to verify that the system can be remotely controlled from the ground.

The US Air Force is also developing a multi-mission command and control aircraft, the MC2A . It is envisioned that the MC2A is not only a sensor node, but also a decision node. In the future, it will replace the E-8C Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System, the Airborne Early Warning and Control System aircraft, and other command, control, and communication aircraft, and will perform many functions of the Air Operations Center. The project is implemented in three phases: Develop the next generation of air-to-ground radar before 2010 ; Develop air search radar and advanced battlefield management system around 2015 ; Equip signal and intelligence equipment in 2020. The main technical challenge is to perform both ground moving target indication and air moving target indication tasks at the same time. In April 2002 , the MC2A-X made its first flight, mainly to check the communication equipment, including internal communication equipment, tactical common data links, and receiving and transmitting equipment for communicating with other airborne sensors and space-based sensors. The first MC2A aircraft is scheduled to be delivered in 2012 .

2.3  Network Construction of the U.S. Army and Marine Corps

The U.S. Army and Marine Corps are developing doctrine and strategy for a ” discontinuous battlefield , ” a battlefield without front lines that will allow the Army and Marine Corps to leverage the power of smaller, more mobile, and more information-dominant forces.

The Gulf War in 1991 exposed the shortcomings of the U.S. Army’s communication system, mainly the FM radio communication system, and the lack of situational awareness and coordination capabilities of combat troops. As a result, the U.S. Army began the digitalization process and achieved satisfactory results. In a battlefield exercise in 1994 , a new network-centric mechanized infantry battalion effortlessly defeated non-network opponents. The U.S. Army expects that in a network-centric environment, each weapon system will have more functions and the number required will be less. In 2001 , the U.S. Army began to develop the Future Combat System, with the goal of equipping non-traditional weapon platforms with advanced sensors and communication equipment to make them large network-centric systems.

The Marine Corps is an integrated land, sea and air force. As early as the Gulf War in 1991 , the Marine Corps began to digitally network the force through e-mail to improve situational awareness. Currently, the Marine Corps is in the process of expanding information networks to grassroots levels such as platoons and classes, and is developing the Marine Corps Enterprise Network, which will eventually develop into a digital Internet composed of ground grids, air grids and space grids. In the war in Afghanistan, the Marine Corps conducted the first large-scale joint operation, with air and ground special forces traveling 640km inland from an amphibious sea base and immediately engaging the enemy without any disconnection. Relying on various communication networks, the special forces contacted the command posts, logistics support forces and allied forces at sea and in Bahrain to coordinate operations and logistics. This is a typical example of effects-based operations, that is, connecting various forces through the network to carry out the most powerful strike on the target.

現代國語:

90年代的幾場局部戰爭表明,資訊網路在現代戰爭中的作用越來越重要,美國部隊的作戰方式開始由平台中心戰轉變為網路中心戰。例如在阿富汗戰爭中,美軍數位與廣播通訊網路將各種不同的、遍布各地的指揮所、感測器以及射手連接起來,使武器平台發揮了更大的作用。數位網路使”掠奪者”無人機能夠向作戰飛機提供即時目標資料與影像,並導引作戰飛機打擊目標。這與科索沃戰爭中”捕食者”無人機僅用於資訊收集相比有了重大發展。

1 美軍網路中心戰概述

1.1 網路中心戰的主要特徵–以效果為基礎

在阿富汗戰爭中,資訊網路讓美空軍一架飛機在執行單獨任務時平均可攻擊兩個目標,而在1991年海灣戰爭中攻擊一個目標平均需要10架飛機。這顯示網路中心戰不是基於平台的作戰,而是基於效果的作戰,每一個武器平台可以攻擊多個目標,而非多個武器平台攻擊一個目標。網路中心戰實現了資訊共享,作戰部隊及其武器平台,包括飛機、裝甲車、火砲、艦艇甚至單兵,不管處於什麼位置,均被集為一體。感測器平台、武器平台以及指揮所的網路化使得空中或地面部隊利用更準確的態勢感知訊息,更迅速、彼此協作並有選擇地攻擊目標,所以網路中心戰的效果是整體大於部分之和。例如,連網戰鬥機一定優於敵方同等數量的非連網戰鬥機,因為連網戰鬥機的每個飛行員不但可以從數位座艙顯示器上看到本機雷達捕捉的影像,而且可以看到同伴飛機雷達捕捉的影像。而非連網戰鬥機的飛行員只能看到本機雷達捕捉的影像。

1.2 網路中心戰的環境–全球資訊柵格

美軍《聯合構想2020》指出,全球資訊柵格(GIG)概念的發展將提供網路中心環境,使資訊能夠在全球範圍內分發。美國國防部已經開始開發作為寬頻網路的GIG,包括發展天基雷射通訊系統和陸基多路光纖網路。天基雷射通訊系統可以使飛機、地面站與軍事衛星相連,陸基多路光纖網則適用於100個不同的網路實體,如國家或地區主要軍事指揮部。未來,GIG將由有關電腦與通訊的資訊柵格,有關天基、空基、陸基、海基以及網路空間感測器的感測器/偵察柵格,以及有關發起與控制各層級作戰的指揮與控制柵格組成。未來10年,美軍將耗資50-100億美元用於GIG建設。預計未來兩年將耗資10億美元建構陸基GIG基礎設施,它將成為網路中心戰的基礎;耗資數十億美元建設特高頻衛星系統,它將使GIG基礎設施擴展到世界各地。發展GIG涉及許多新技術,如光纖多路復用、空間雷射通訊等技術。在美國2003財年國防預算中,將有25億美元用於太空雷射通訊技術,據稱該技術”具有在任何時間、向在任何地方作戰的美國部隊提供光纖質量的寬頻安全通訊的能力。”

1.3 網路中心戰的主要障礙–不相容性

美國軍方的通訊設備以及各軍種有關係統體系結構間普遍存在的不相容性是實現完全網路中心戰概念的主要障礙。參聯會的指揮、控制、通訊與電腦部負責克服此障礙,措施之一是確保現在採購的系統既與原有系統相容,也與未來系統相容。

2 美國各軍種網路中心戰研究進展

2.1美海軍協同作戰能力(CEC)網

中心設在”宙斯盾”艦上的抗干擾CEC系統,能夠將防空作戰指揮與控制系統、感測器、武器平台以及附近的其它平台連接在一起。 CEC感測器柵格為海軍提供了一幅兵力整體影像,它能夠融合來自多種機載感測器與艦載感測器的目標識別與追蹤數據,極大地提高海軍對戰場的態勢感知能力以及作戰能力。 CEC作戰柵格利用融合資料定位由防空作戰飛機以及艦艇發射的飛彈,使其在離作戰群安全的距離上攔截多個來襲飛彈。 CEC不僅是對網路中心戰的一個重要貢獻,而且為在所有戰區部隊間生成一體化空中圖像奠定了良好基礎。 2001年4月,美國國防部批准將CEC與美陸軍”愛國者”防空飛彈系統連結。據稱,CEC還可與美國空軍的預警機相連,以提供無縫的聯合戰區防空能力。另外,美海軍還計劃建立全球海軍因特網,這是一個能在世界範圍內的海軍部隊之間蒐集、處理與分發戰場數據的資訊柵格。

2.2 美國空軍智慧加油機及多任務指揮與控制飛機

美空軍正在實施智慧加油機計劃,目的是發展下一代空中加油飛機,並使之兼作資訊接收與中繼節點。智慧加油機是實現空中因特網的最佳選擇,因為它們通常是在戰區附近的高空飛行,加裝有關電子設備後即可實現此功能。透過資料鏈間的資訊傳輸裝置,加油機能夠在不同系統,如海軍CEC系統與陸軍改進型位置確定報告系統之間無縫接收與發送資料。智慧加油機將安裝電子掃描陣列,從而成為”鉚釘”聯合電子偵察飛機的遠程天線,從戰區內的多個地點蒐集信息,然後將信息轉發給”鉚釘”聯合電子偵察飛機,由後者進行處理與分發。空中加油機的智慧化主要是在KC-135加油機上加裝ROBE通訊終端。 ROBE是一種可擴展的模組化機載中繼終端,可用於數據中繼,實現網絡中成員間的視距/超視距通信,如實現空中與太空作戰中心指揮人員與戰區指揮人員之間的通信,或更快地向士兵提供重要數據,以便迅速做出決策以及打擊時間敏感目標。 ROBE還能擴大通訊範圍,讓所有士兵分享態勢感知資訊。 2002年10月,美空軍成功展示了智慧加油機概念。裝備ROBE的KC -135加油機從埃格林空軍基地飛向漢斯科莫空軍基地,成功地將來自F-15以及”聯合星”的所有戰術數據傳輸到漢斯科莫空軍基地的作戰中心,而且工作人員不定期對ROBE系統進行復位,以驗證系統可以從地面進行遙控。

美空軍也正在開發多任務指揮與控制飛機,即MC2A飛機。按設想,MC2A不但是感測器節點,也是決策節點,未來將取代E -8C聯合監視目標攻擊雷達系統、機載預警與控制系統飛機以及其它指揮、控制、通信飛機,並將執行空中作戰中心的許多功能。本計畫分三個階段實施:2010年以前開發下一代空-地雷達;2015年左右開發空中搜索雷達和先進戰場管理系統;2020年裝備訊號與情報設備。主要技術挑戰是同時執行地面動目標指示與空中動目標指示兩項任務。 2002年4月,MC2A-X進行了首次飛行,目的主要是檢查通訊設備,包括內部通訊設備、戰術通用資料鏈路以及與其它機載感測器、天基感測器進行通訊的接收與發送設備。首架MC2A飛機預定2012年交付。

2.3 美陸軍與海軍陸戰隊網路建設

美陸軍與海軍陸戰隊正在發展有關”非連續戰場”的學說與策略。非連續戰場是一種沒有前線的戰場,這將使陸軍與海軍陸戰隊充分發揮更小型、更機動以及更具資訊優勢的部隊的威力。

1991年的海灣戰爭暴露了美陸軍通訊系統,主要是調頻無線電通訊系統有缺點,而且作戰部隊的態勢感知與協調能力不足。於是,美陸軍開始了數位化進程,並且取得了滿意的結果。在1994年的一次戰場演習中,一個新型的網路中心機械化步兵營毫不費力地戰勝了非網路對手。美陸軍預計,在網路中心環境中每個武器系統所具有的功能更多,所需數量將更少。 2001年,美陸軍開始開發未來戰鬥系統,目標是為非傳統武器平台裝備先進的感測器與通訊設備,使其成為網路中心化的大系統。

海軍陸戰隊是一體化的陸、海、空部隊。早在1991年海灣戰爭期間,海軍陸戰隊就開始透過電子郵件使部隊實現數位網路化,提高態勢感知能力。目前,海軍陸戰隊正處於向諸如排級、班級等基層擴大資訊網路的過程中,正在開發海軍陸戰隊企業網,該網最終將發展為由地面柵格、空中柵格和太空柵格組成的數位因特網。在阿富汗戰爭中,海軍陸戰隊實施了第一次大規模聯合作戰,空中和地面特種部隊從兩棲海上基地向內地行進長達640km,並立即與敵人交火,沒有任何脫節。依靠各種通訊網絡,特種部隊與在海上和在巴林的指揮所、後勤支援部隊以及盟軍進行聯繫,協調作戰與後勤。這是基於效果作戰的典型範例,透過網路將各種部隊連接在一起,對目標實施威力最大的打擊。

中國原創軍事資源:http://www.81it.com/2012/1127/3320888.html